OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Honor Pad X8a review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:?Screen size:11 inchesChipset:?

Honor Pad X8a Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 44 expert and video reviews and 4 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Honor Pad X8a
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

35%

7.7

Technical score

30%

8.2

List score

25%

8.0

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▲Better than 83% of tablets
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

★Better than 97%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

7.2

Display

16%

7.9

Camera

14%

7.9

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

7.8

Design

3%

6.7

Audio

▲Better than 80%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

9.1

Popularity

Grades by review (44)
20 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 13 estimated from the review. 24 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 60%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (4)
List score: in 4 of 139 lists (3%)
★Better than 96%
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
  • honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
honor-pad-x8a
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Honor Pad X8a

Based on 20 · 25

Reviewers love the long battery life and solid build, but criticize slow charging, weak performance for gaming, and poor cameras.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Honor Pad X8a

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

7.2

Display

16%

7.9

Camera

14%

7.9

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software

5%

7.8

Design

3%

6.7

Audio

7.7
Reviews score
8.0
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

8.4
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process, which is smaller than 76.1% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
?
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 90 Hz screen, which is smoother than 73.5% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
206 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 206 ppi, which is lower than 60.7% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
8,300 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,300 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 76.6% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
?
Battery life
?
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
?
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
?
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
?
Weight
?
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Honor Pad X8a vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 50% faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.7% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • 25.8% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 0.9 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 60% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (44)
    20 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 13 estimated from the review. 24 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • 11.5% better value for money
    Honor Pad X8a has better value for money than the average tablet (8.42 vs 7.6).
    8.42 vs 7.55
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Honor Pad X8a is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 50% faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.7% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 0.9 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 25.8% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5).
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 6.8% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (206 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    206 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 6.8% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (206 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    206 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Tech Jamo
≈ estimated
06/07/2026
Hands-on review · Wi-Fi, gaming, video and performance tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is fine for kids, videos and light browsing, but not for speed or demanding use.
9.0
Quick Expert Reviews
≈ estimated
19/07/2025
Hands-on review · gaming, speaker and feature tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a very good alternative to more expensive tablets, its only real drawback being the lack of video output.
8.0
Harish Rohilla
≈ estimated
20/05/2025
Long-term review · six months of daily use and gaming tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a solid tablet for media, online study and casual gaming, but not for hardcore gamers.
6.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
17/01/2025
Unboxing and first review · battery, speaker and camera tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a has a decent build and battery, but sluggish performance and a weak low-light camera hold it back.
5.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
13/12/2024
Hands-on review · benchmarks, games and battery test
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is not recommended at its price, though it could be worth a look if the price drops much lower.
7.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
26/10/2024
Hands-on review · gaming, benchmarks and battery tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is fine for simple productivity at a low price, but weak for gaming and multimedia.
8.0
TechKuya: Tech for techies, pare.
≈ estimated
07/10/2024
Hands-on review · benchmarks, battery and gaming tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is worth considering for light to moderate users, but not for heavy multitasking or demanding games.
6.0
TechKuya: Tech for techies, pare.
≈ estimated
07/10/2024
Hands-on review · gaming tests and benchmarks
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is playable on lowest settings, but sluggish in Genshin and PUBG, while Mobile Legends and Asphalt 8 run well.
7.0
Now & Then Tech
≈ estimated
15/09/2024
Hands-on review · gaming, screen and software tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a decent performer for basic needs, but gaming is limited and the screen falls short.
8.0
Typical Tech Lad
≈ estimated
13/09/2024
Hands-on review · battery, gaming and camera tests
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a budget tablet for light use, with a good battery and display but weak gaming and basic cameras.
8.0
Indulge Express (indulgexpress)
≈ estimated
18/01/2025
Short review · design, screen, performance and battery
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a solid budget tablet for students and light users, though not a premium experience.
8.0
Ash Does Tech
≈ estimated
16/11/2024
Hands-on review · design, display, performance and camera
Verdict
Honor Pad X8a is a solid everyday tablet at its price, though not for heavy gaming or multitasking.
More graded video reviews (2)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

5.0
mynexttablet.com
≈ estimated
02/12/2024
Full review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a has a smooth 90Hz screen and good software, but weak speakers and a weak chip make it hard to recommend at its price.
8.0
basic-tutorials.com
✓ explicit
28/09/2024
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a budget tablet with a smooth 90Hz screen and long battery life, best for video, reading and social apps, not 3D games.
7.0
technave.com
≈ estimated
30/10/2024
Hands-on test · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a suits students and everyday users who want a big screen, a full day of battery life and clear video calls, but sluggish performance holds it back.
8.0
vgtimes.com
≈ estimated
13/10/2026
Benchmark review · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a solid entry-level tablet with a stylish metal body and a responsive screen, best for work, video and casual games rather than demanding titles.
8.0
indianexpress.com
✓ explicit
09/10/2024
Hands-on review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a suits budget buyers who want video and easy multitasking, though its limited RAM means only three or four apps stay open.
8.1
gadgetpilipinas.net
✓ explicit
07/10/2024
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a suits media watching and light productivity, with a premium-feeling metal body, clean software and good value for a budget tablet.
9.0
ungeek.ph
≈ estimated
17/10/2024
Hands-on review · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a sleek, capable tablet for streaming and everyday work, but it is no gaming or editing machine.
9.0
techpatrl.com
≈ estimated
08/10/2024
Real-world use · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a suits students, home workers and light traders, running charts and video calls smoothly, but it isn't a powerful machine.
5.0
tabletblog.de
≈ estimated
02/12/2024
Benchmark test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a nice-looking tablet with a good 90Hz screen, but weak speakers and slow graphics make it hard to recommend at its price.
8.3
techreviewer.de
✓ explicit
18/10/2024
Hands-on test · Budget media tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a solid budget tablet with strong streaming support and battery life, but it is not made for demanding apps or games.
7.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
08/10/2024
Hands-on test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a good media tablet with an evenly lit screen and full streaming support, though its old chip and slow storage limit it.
8.3
basic-tutorials.de
✓ explicit
28/09/2024
Lab test · Stylus budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a looks more expensive than it is, with a good screen, strong battery life and loud, clear speakers, but it struggles with games.
8.0
ratgeber.pcgameshardware.de
≈ estimated
08/10/2024
Hands-on test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a good budget tablet for films, games and kids, with rich colors and easy setup, but its stylus is only average.
8.0
it-connect.fr
≈ estimated
08/10/2024
Hands-on test · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a good-value entry-level tablet for office work and videos, but it cannot handle demanding games; Honor phone owners will feel at home.
7.0
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
✓ explicit
08/10/2024
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a casual tablet for streaming, browsing and video calls, with a strong screen and battery life, but it struggles with 3D games.
8.0
metatrone.fr
≈ estimated
28/09/2024
Hands-on review · Affordable tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a thin, well-finished tablet with a smooth 90Hz screen and long battery life, but it is no gaming or performance machine.
8.4
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
08/10/2024
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a budget tablet with a smooth 90Hz screen and long battery life, best for video, reading and social apps, not 3D games.
8.0
androidphoria.com
≈ estimated
08/10/2024
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a budget tablet for video and reading, with an elegant metal body and long battery life, but it cannot handle demanding games or multitasking.
8.0
es.vgtimes.com
≈ estimated
13/10/2026
Hands-on review · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a sound entry-level pick with a metal build and responsive screen, bright enough for work and films, though heavy games are a stretch.
9.0
agendatecnologicaweb.com
≈ estimated
21/10/2024
Vlog review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Honor Pad X8a is a sturdy, stylish entry tablet with a smooth 90Hz screen and long battery life, suited to people who mainly want media and browsing.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Honor Pad X8a

  • Built-in GPS makes it useful for maps on walks and drives.
  • Four speakers give films and music a fuller sound.
  • The adaptive 90 Hz refresh rate keeps motion smooth when content changes.
  • LDAC support lets wireless headphones play higher-quality sound.
  • The 1500:1 contrast ratio gives films deeper blacks.
  • Manual shutter speed gives more control over photos.

What customers don't like about Honor Pad X8a

  • There is no 3.5 mm headphone jack, so wired earphones need an adapter.
  • There is no optical image stabilization, so handheld video can look shaky.
  • 4 GB of RAM limits heavy multitasking.
  • Update support is medium, so software updates may stop sooner.

Verdict

Anyone who wants maps on a tablet for walks and car trips will find the Honor Pad X8a useful, because it has built-in GPS. The 11 inch screen runs at 90 Hz, and its adaptive refresh rate changes the speed to suit what is on screen. Four speakers give films and music a fuller sound. The 8300 mAh battery is a solid size for a day of films and maps, and the 6 nm chip is an efficient design that helps power use. HDR photos, continuous autofocus in video and manual shutter speed round out the camera. The trade-off is that there is no 3.5 mm headphone jack, so wired earphones need an adapter. It suits someone who wants a simple tablet for navigation and entertainment at home, not one for heavy work.

Compare Honor Pad X8a with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Honor Pad X8a and other tablets

No results found