OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.61 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio G99

Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB)
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

90%

7.1

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 74% of tablets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–²Better than 80%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.4

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.9

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

8.6

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 72%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 87%
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-4gb-128gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GB3GB + 64GBCheck price6GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.4

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.9

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

8.6

Audio & Multimedia

7.1
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 8.7 points, which is lower than 83.8% of Tablets.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
720 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 720 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 53.1% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G99
This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 50.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
220 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 220 ppi which is lower than that of 50.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 70.6% of tablets and equal to those in 3.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
21 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 21 hours, which is longer than that of 97.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
445 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 445 g which is lighter than 69% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 11 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (21 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    21 hours vs 10 hours
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 11.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.93 vs 8.000).
    8.93 vs 8
  • 80.7% more popular
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (8.69 vs 4.8).
    8.69 vs 4.81
  • 11.6% better value for money
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.92 vs 7.1).
    7.92 vs 7.1
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2,400 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 0.51 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.61 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • 50% higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 11 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (21 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    21 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 21.6% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 9.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (445 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    445 g vs 490 g
  • 0.9 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 21.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (512 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    512 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 21.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (512 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    512 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (220 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    220 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 50.38 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (250.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    250.38 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

cgmagonline.com
04/10/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a simple, long-lasting tablet with a sharp screen for adults, though Fortnite is unsupported and Netflix is unreliable.
gsmarena.com
19/10/2022
Overview review · Affordable tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a well-balanced tablet with a 90Hz screen, a big 8000mAh battery and a microSD slot, though charging tops out at 18W.
chip.de
31/05/2023
Lab test · Multimedia tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a good multimedia tablet for videos, standard apps and simple games, with a strong battery, but demanding tasks and camera quality fall short.
L
lesnumeriques.com
26/12/2022
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad: Une tablette simple, efficace et abordable
(Translated)Show original
frandroid.com
11/01/2023
Review · Budget tablet for films
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad suits films and series with its light body and good battery life, but 3D games and MIUI 13 hold it back.
presse-citron.net
25/10/2022
Review · Budget tablet for video
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a light, good-sounding tablet for video, but its Helio G99 chip struggles in 3D games and portrait use feels awkward.
notebookcheck.biz
12/08/2022
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a light, sturdy tablet with strong speakers, but it has no GPS or NFC and copies data slowly from microSD cards.
es.root-nation.com
23/04/2023
Full review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a well-balanced mid-range tablet with a long-lasting battery and sharp screen for everyday tasks, though its metal back shows fingerprints.
smartworld.it
03/01/2023
Review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a well-built tablet with a 90Hz screen and battery lasting three to four days, but it has no headphone jack and charges slowly.
id.nl
29/10/2022
Review · Budget tablet for home use
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad suits films, browsing and video calls thanks to its long battery life, but its software and missing headphone jack hold it back.
notebookcheck.nl
08/12/2022
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a light tablet with strong quad speakers, but it lacks GPS, NFC and mobile data, and it has no water rating.
P
pcactive.nl
05/05/2023
Summary of the review
Review Xiaomi Redmi Pad: middenklasse Android-tablet
(Translated)Show original
W
want.nl
06/12/2022
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad: waarom de goedkope tablet de moeite waard is
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Premium build quality with an all-metal unibody design
  • Excellent quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos support for immersive audio
  • Vibrant high-resolution display (2K to 2.5K) with smooth 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rates
  • Long-lasting battery life, often cited as lasting several days for casual use
  • Great value for money, offering mid-range specs at a budget price point
  • Smooth performance for everyday tasks like web browsing, streaming, and light gaming

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Slow charging speeds relative to the large battery capacity
  • Underwhelming camera quality, especially in low-light conditions
  • Lack of a fingerprint scanner, relying instead on face unlock or PINs
  • Aggressive RAM management in lower memory configurations (4GB models)
  • Software limitations in HyperOS/MIUI, such as the lack of a dedicated 'PC mode' or advanced tablet features
  • Unreliable auto-brightness sensors and limited viewing angles in some base models

Verdict

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is an affordable, well-rounded tablet featuring a 10.61-inch 2K display with a 90Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 400 nits. It is powered by the MediaTek Helio G99 6nm processor, which provides smooth performance for multitasking and light gaming, supported by LPDDR4X RAM and UFS 2.2 storage. Main characteristics include a premium metal unibody design, quad speakers with Dolby Atmos support, and a massive 8,000mAh battery that supports 18W fast charging for extended use. Notable pros are its smooth high-refresh-rate screen, impressive battery longevity, and high-quality audio experience for its price class. However, some cons include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no GPS or SIM card support, and the absence of HDR in the display.

Compare Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found