Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£600RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:9.7 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 820

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB)
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–²Better than 70% of tablets
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

â–²Better than 52%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software & Features

5%

7.8

Design

3%

7.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 69%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 82%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software & Features

5%

7.8

Design

3%

7.5

Audio & Multimedia

7.0
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 8.5 points, which is lower than 82.4% of Tablets.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
301 points
This tablet scored 301 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 85.3% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 66.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2048×1536
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2048×1536 which is higher than that of 68.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This tablet uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 92.5% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
264 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 264 ppi which is higher than that of 71% of tablets and equal to that of 5.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 which is wider than that of 82.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 4.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
429 g
This tablet weighs 429 g which is lighter than 71.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2.4 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2.4 ms, which is lower than that of 88.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 299 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (700 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    700 nits vs 401 nits
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 530 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 530 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 6.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.52 vs 8.000).
    8.52 vs 8
  • 77% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average tablet (8.51 vs 4.8).
    8.51 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 530 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 530 vs Mali-G51
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4 vs LPDDR3
  • 7.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.15 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • 299 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (700 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    700 nits vs 401 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2048×1536 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2048×1536 vs 1920×1200
  • 17.9% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (264 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    264 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 41 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (441 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    441 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 43 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (264 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    264 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Fingerprint scanner in the home button.
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 2 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6.6 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2.4 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2.4 ms vs 9 ms
  • 12.4% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (429 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    429 g vs 490 g
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • 59% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (776 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    776 points vs 1,891 points
  • 58.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (301 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    301 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 2.31x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£600 vs £260).
    £600 vs £260
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 2.31x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£600 vs £260).
    £600 vs £260
  • 59% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (776 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    776 points vs 1,891 points
  • 58.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (301 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    301 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 0.4 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 8.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 37.3 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (237.3 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    237.3 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
16/06/2017
Full review · display, performance, battery and software tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is the best Android tablet right now, mainly for its display, though it is quite pricey.
6.0
kat4K
≈ estimated
03/05/2017
Hands-on review · battery drain and durability
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi has a nice design and stylus, but it is fragile and drains battery quickly, so it suits careful users best.
9.5
DetroitBORG
≈ estimated
04/04/2017
Unboxing and review · features and software tour
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is probably the best Android tablet on sale, with a strong display and S Pen integration.
9.5
Android Headlines - Android News & Tech News
≈ estimated
26/03/2017
Full review · daily use, battery and camera impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is the model to pick in its range, though it is not the cheapest.
9.0
Engadget
≈ estimated
22/03/2017
Full review · performance, battery and keyboard tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is practical and suits nearly all needs, especially for creators who accept a cramped keyboard.
9.0
TECH360.TV
≈ estimated
10/06/2017
Hands-on review · about a month of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is well built and fast, but battery life is its main weakness.
9.0
Erin Lawrence
≈ estimated
25/04/2017
Hands-on review · screen, pen and speaker impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi is a strong Android tablet for its screen and pen, though the price is fairly high.
7.0
C4ETech English
≈ estimated
20/06/2017
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi looks and feels premium, but it is expensive and uses last year's chip.
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
laptopmag.com
21/03/2017
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
A
androidheadlines.com
24/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
09/04/2018
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
10/04/2017
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
10/11/2017
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
19/02/2019
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
02/07/2018
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
10/04/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
02/05/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
02/05/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/08/2018
Summary of the review
C
curved.de
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
14/04/2017
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
22/06/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB)

  • Stunning 9.7-inch Super AMOLED display with HDR support and vibrant colors
  • Included S Pen is highly responsive, supports 4,096 pressure levels, and requires no battery
  • Four AKG-tuned speakers provide loud, clear audio that adjusts based on orientation
  • Thin, lightweight premium design featuring a sleek metal and glass build
  • Strong battery life, often cited between 7.5 to 12 hours depending on usage
  • Fast charging support via USB-C significantly reduces downtime

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB)

  • High initial price point compared to competitors like the standard iPad
  • Glass back is a major fingerprint magnet and can be slippery or fragile
  • No internal storage slot or magnetic attachment for the S Pen on the tablet itself
  • Android tablet software and app ecosystem lack optimization for larger screens
  • Fingerprint sensor can be finicky and unreliable for some users
  • Base internal storage of 32GB is considered low for a premium device

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (Wi-Fi) is a premium 9.7-inch tablet featuring a vibrant Super AMOLED display with 2048 x 1536 resolution and HDR support. It is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include a sleek glass-and-metal design, a quad-speaker system tuned by AKG, and an included S Pen stylus that supports 4,096 levels of pressure sensitivity. Main pros include its exceptional screen quality, responsive stylus performance, and fast Wi-Fi connectivity. However, notable cons include its high initial price point, a glass back that attracts fingerprints and is prone to damage, and a mobile operating system that limits its potential as a full laptop replacement.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 WiFi (4GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found