OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£400RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Exynos 4412

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 35 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

35%

5.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.0

Reviews score

10%

9.7

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 58% of tablets
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 57%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software

5%

8.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio

â–¼Worse than 70%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (35)
20 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 12 estimated from the review. 15 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
  • samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
  • samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-2gb-16gb-3g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £400
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 20 · 15

Reviewers love the stylus and smooth performance, but the camera and build disappoint, and opinions on the display are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 173 owners sharing their experience in online comments

71%positive5%mixed24%negative

Owners love the versatile S Pen and compact productivity, while aging batteries and outdated software are the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Battery wears down over time and some owners charge it nightly; some say it cannot be swapped, and battery life dropped after an update.14
  • After installing a custom ROM, setup can loop on the Google agreement or voice search screen, or the tablet can stick at the boot logo.9
  • Samsung stopped the software at KitKat, an old Android version, and owners feel the tablet now looks and feels dated.6
  • After a drop, the screen cracked and the tablet would not charge or turn on; a damaged connector also ruined one unit.6
  • Text can look jagged with a staircase effect, and owners wish the screen had higher resolution such as 1080p.5
  • The screen can freeze for about five seconds at a time, and after installing a custom ROM the tablet felt very slow.5
  • After installing a custom ROM, Wi-Fi may save the network but not connect, and Bluetooth or Wi-Fi Direct file sending may fail.3
  • Several note-taking features are hard to get working right, and some owners found the tablet more work-oriented than a simple tablet.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software

5%

8.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio

5.5
Reviews score
8.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.5
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process, which is larger than 82.7% of tablets and equal to 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Exynos 4412
This tablet runs on Exynos 4412, which is more advanced than 75.9% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
189 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 189 ppi, which is lower than 66.5% of tablets and equal to 6.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
4,600 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,600 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 77.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 15 W, which is slower than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
?
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
IP68
This tablet's IP rating is IP68, which is more protected than 94.6% of tablets and the same as 3.5% of tablets.
Weight
338 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 338 g, which is lighter than 85% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 4412 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.7 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.7 vs f/2.2
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68 vs not rated).
    IP68 vs not rated
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    709% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (35)
    20 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 12 estimated from the review. 15 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • 29.3% higher sentiment score
    9.7 vs 7.5
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Exynos 4412 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    709% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 64 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (465 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    465 nits vs 401 nits
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.7 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.7 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This tablet supports reverse wireless charging, while the average tablet does not. 4.1% of tablets support reverse wireless charging.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Fingerprint unlocking
    This tablet supports fingerprint unlocking, while the average tablet does not. 16% of tablets offer this.
    Rear-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via MHL adapter
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68 vs not rated).
    IP68 vs not rated
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 39.4 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (135.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    135.9 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 53.9% more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£400 vs £260).
    £400 vs £260
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 20% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (750:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    750:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 14.5% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 30.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
H2TechVideos
≈ estimated
03/09/2013
Pros and cons review · own use and remote tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is definitely worth buying and one of the best mid-range tablets, though its design is plain.
9.0
TheDigitalDigest
≈ estimated
12/08/2013
Full review · battery, S Pen and storage tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is liked overall, but its screen is the main letdown for buyers who expect a top-tier display.
7.0
FoneArena
≈ estimated
01/07/2013
Hands-on review · performance, camera, S Pen and battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is great for note-taking with the S Pen, but a weak standalone tablet if you need more than notes.
7.0
Andrew Darling
≈ estimated
14/06/2013
Day 2 update · size, calls and speed tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G handles calls and messaging well, but its size is awkward in a pocket and mobile speeds are modest.
8.0
Booredatwork.com
≈ estimated
22/04/2013
Hands-on review · features, S Pen and camera
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is a nice tablet with solid features, though the cameras need improvement.
9.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
13/03/2013
Hands-on review · camera, software and note-taking tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is not perfect as a tablet, but it is the best choice for note-taking and handwriting right now.
8.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
15/07/2013
Unboxing and first look · S Pen and settings check
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G makes a very nice first impression, though repeated pop-up tips and an older software version are frustrating.
8.0
Carlos Delgado
≈ estimated
Hands-on review · performance, battery, speakers and camera
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is fast and enjoyable to use, though the speakers and screen hold it back.
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
17/04/2013
Lab test · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is fast and fluid, with a TV remote built in, but weak browser zoom and no Flash make other tablets better value.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
11/04/2013
Lab test · Pen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is the best consumer pen tablet, but its price and short battery mean it suits artists more than typical buyers.
7.5
mobiletechreview.com
✓ explicit
22/04/2013
Short review · Stylus tablet comparison
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is the obvious pick over the iPad mini for serious note takers and artists, thanks to its S Pen.
6.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
24/04/2013
Hands-on review · S Pen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is almost a great tablet for pen users, with strong multitasking, but its battery and design hold it back.
6.0
whathifi.com
✓ explicit
11/12/2013
Test room review · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 once showed promise as a stylus tablet, but its lower-resolution screen and dated Android now lag newer rivals.
9.0
statetechmagazine.com
≈ estimated
19/07/2013
Product review · Business stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a reliable stylus tablet for office work, with strong note-taking, but its slippery back and protruding camera need a case.
8.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
08/04/2013
Lab test · Pen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is the best note-taking tablet on the market, with deep pen support and fast multitasking, but it's pricey and battery life is modest.
8.0
computerwoche.de
≈ estimated
29/05/2013
Full test · Phone-tablet hybrid
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a fast, light 8-inch tablet with a sharp screen, stylus and phone features, but its battery is only average.
8.0
heise.de
≈ estimated
21/05/2013
Full test · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a worthwhile choice for S-Pen fans, but its cheap-feeling body and disappointing camera and display hold it back.
8.1
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
15/05/2013
Full test · Phone-capable stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a flexible stylus tablet that works fast, but its handwriting recognition and average battery hold it back.
8.0
techniktest-online.de
≈ estimated
12/04/2016
Retro review · Pen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Note 8.0 3G is still a top pen tablet, small enough for a back pocket, but slow to charge and picky about chargers.
6.0
frandroid.com
≈ estimated
24/06/2013
Review · Stylus 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is an 8-inch stylus tablet that stands apart from rivals competing only on price.
8.0
lesandroides.net
≈ estimated
24/04/2013
Lab test · Stylus 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a well-built 8-inch tablet with a strong stylus and fast performance, but its short battery life and high price limit it.
6.0
journaldugeek.com
✓ explicit
13/05/2013
Hands-on test · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a comfortable 8-inch stylus tablet with smooth performance, but its 1280 x 800 screen and weak speakers hold it back.
8.0
igen.fr
≈ estimated
25/02/2013
Hands-on test · Pen tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a pen tablet with an iPad mini-quality screen and handy hover tricks, held back by plasticky build quality.
8.0
xataka.com
≈ estimated
24/06/2013
Hands-on review · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a light 8-inch tablet that suits S Pen and split-screen work, but its battery lasts only about seven hours.
7.0
elespanol.com
≈ estimated
08/08/2013
Hands-on review · 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a smooth 8-inch tablet that lasts about two days on moderate use, but its high price holds it back.
7.0
teknofilo.com
≈ estimated
20/10/2013
Extended test · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a powerful 8-inch stylus tablet with a long battery, but no 4G and a lower-density screen hold it back.
9.0
dday.it
≈ estimated
02/07/2013
Full test · Pen tablet with 3G
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a top-tier tablet with a long-lasting battery and smooth multi-window, but it's too expensive.
8.0
tweakers.net
≈ estimated
26/02/2013
Hands-on preview · Stylus tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 mixes Note 10.1 and Galaxy S III parts, but its price is hard to justify next to the iPad mini and Nexus 7.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)

  • Excellent S Pen stylus support with high pressure sensitivity for drawing and note-taking
  • Zippy quad-core performance and 2GB RAM allow for smooth multitasking and fluid UI
  • Compact and lightweight 8-inch design is comfortable for one-handed use
  • Useful software features like Multi Window (split-screen) and universal remote capabilities
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot up to 64GB

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB)

  • High initial retail price compared to competitors like the iPad mini and Nexus 7
  • Mediocre battery life, especially when gaming or using 3D functions
  • Display resolution (1280x800) is lower than some rivals, leading to slightly pixelated icons
  • Underwhelming camera quality with no flash and poor performance in low light
  • Plastic build can feel slippery and lacks premium materials like Gorilla Glass

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G is an 8-inch tablet featuring a WXGA TFT display with a resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels and 189 ppi. It is powered by a 1.6 GHz quad-core Exynos 4412 processor paired with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD slot up to 64GB. Key characteristics include a built-in S Pen stylus with 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity, 3G cellular connectivity with phone capabilities, and an IR blaster for remote control functionality. Main pros include its responsive multitasking via Multi-View, the highly functional S Pen for note-taking and drawing, and a portable design that is easier to hold with one hand than larger tablets. However, common cons include a plastic build that some find cheap, lackluster 5MP rear and 1.3MP front cameras without a flash, and a non-removable 4,600 mAh battery that often struggles to last through a full day of heavy use.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 3G (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found