Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-3437U

Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–²Better than 61% of tablets
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

7.2

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

6.0

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

6.1

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 61%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 69%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Available versions:
Other versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

7.2

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

6.0

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

6.1

Audio & Multimedia

6.6
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

7.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 2.5 points, which is higher than 61.8% of Tablets.
2.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.5
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Core i5-3437U
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3437U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 73.7% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,200 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,200 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 81.6% of tablets and equal to those in 1.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
65 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 91.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.7% of tablets.
Battery life
11 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11 hours, which is longer than that of 60.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
?
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP65
This tablet has an IP rating of IP65 which is higher than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Weight
1,100 g
This tablet weighs 1,100 g which is heavier than 98.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
30 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 30 ms, which is higher than that of 92.2% of tablets and equal to that of 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3437U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-3437U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 399 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    800 nits vs 401 nits
  • 400 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    800 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP65 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP65 vs not rated
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3437U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-3437U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 2.29x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (34.1 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    34.1 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 12 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (16 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    16 vs 4
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Intel HD Graphics 5500 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Intel HD Graphics 5,500 vs Mali-G51
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 18.7% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,245 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    2,245 points vs 1,891 points
  • 399 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    800 nits vs 401 nits
  • 400 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    800 nits vs 400 nits
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.7% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 1 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    11 hours vs 10 hours
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP65 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP65 vs not rated
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 36.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    4,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 2.24x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (1,100 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    1,100 g vs 490 g
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • 3.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.74 vs 8.000).
    7.74 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 533 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,333 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,333 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (965:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    965:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 36.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    4,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 2.24x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (1,100 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    1,100 g vs 490 g
  • 11 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (19 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    19 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 21 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (30 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    30 ms vs 9 ms
  • 93.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (269 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    269.0 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 6 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

  • Exceptional ruggedness: Certified to MIL-STD-810G and IP65 standards, surviving drops, water, and extreme temperatures.
  • High-quality display: The 800-nit screen is highly readable in direct sunlight with excellent viewing angles due to IPS Alpha technology.
  • Strong performance: Features full Intel Core i5/i7 processors and fast SSD storage, providing a smooth Windows experience.
  • Versatile input: Includes a responsive Wacom digitizer/stylus and a 10-point capacitive touchscreen that works with gloved hands.
  • Modular design: Highly customizable with optional ports for Ethernet, barcode readers, or additional USB ports.
  • Field-ready battery: Users report decent battery life that is easily user-replaceable, with extended life battery options available.

What customers don't like about Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB)

  • Noisy cooling: The integrated fan can be loud and annoying, especially in quiet environments.
  • Limited standard ports: Only comes with a single USB port by default, requiring expensive modular upgrades for more.
  • Poor camera quality: Both front and rear cameras are frequently described as lackluster, with blurry or grainy results.
  • High cost: The premium price tag is difficult for individuals or small businesses to justify outside of hazardous work environments.
  • Weight and bulk: While light for a rugged device, it is significantly heavier and thicker than consumer tablets.
  • Stylus alignment: Some reviewers noted difficulty with pen alignment near the edges of the screen.

Verdict

The Panasonic Toughpad FZ-G1 is a fully rugged 10.1-inch tablet featuring an Intel Core i5 vPro processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 128GB SSD, designed for high-performance use in extreme field environments. Key characteristics include a sunlight-readable WUXGA (1920 x 1200) 10-point gloved multi-touch display with an integrated Wacom digitizer for precise stylus input, along with MIL-STD-810G and IP65 certifications for resistance against drops, water, and dust. Main pros are its exceptionally bright 800-nit screen, user-replaceable battery, and lightweight magnesium alloy chassis that maintains durability without excessive bulk. Notable cons include a limited selection of standard ports with only one USB slot out of the box, relatively short battery life on standard packs when under heavy load, and a tendency for the underside to become uncomfortably hot during intensive tasks.

Compare Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic Toughpad Fz G1 WiFi (8GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found