Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£470RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:13.2 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8

Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 99% of tablets
8.7

Value for money

Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

★Better than 99%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

9.7

Performance

20%

9.0

Display

16%

9.0

Camera

14%

9.5

Battery

12%

7.6

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.1

Design

3%

8.1

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 99%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £470
Other versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

9.7

Performance

20%

9.0

Display

16%

9.0

Camera

14%

9.5

Battery

12%

7.6

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.1

Design

3%

8.1

Audio & Multimedia

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

8.7
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
3 nm
This tablet is built on a 3 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 96.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 3.3% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
2,576 points
This tablet scored 2,576 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 92.8% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 92.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3392×2400
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3392×2400 which is higher than that of 99.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
315 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 315 ppi which is higher than that of 93.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
12,140 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 12,140 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 98.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
67 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 67 W which is faster than in 95.6% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.9% of tablets.
Battery life
17.75 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 17.75 hours, which is longer than that of 93.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
?
Weight
675 g
This tablet weighs 675 g which is heavier than 86.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
8 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 8 ms, which is lower than that of 70.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
8
This tablet includes 8 microphones, which is more than in 99.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 0.2% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
8
This tablet includes 8 speakers, which is more than in 96.4% of tablets and equal to the number in 3.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3392×2400 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3392×2400 vs 1920×1200
  • 7.75 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (17.8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    17.75 hours vs 10 hours
  • 2.16x higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 830 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 830 vs Mali-G51
  • 5.32x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (10,059 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,059 points vs 1,891 points
  • 84.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 22.3% better value for money
    Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.68 vs 7.1).
    8.68 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.16x higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 830 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 830 vs Mali-G51
  • 5.32x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (10,059 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,059 points vs 1,891 points
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 3.53x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,576 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,576 points vs 729 points
  • 5.72x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (85.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    85.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 6,667 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 78.6% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (3 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    3 nm vs 14 nm
  • 69.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,100 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,100 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3392×2400 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3392×2400 vs 1920×1200
  • 499 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (900 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    900 nits vs 401 nits
  • 500 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (900 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    900 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.1 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 40.6% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (315 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    315 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    98% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 94 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (315 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    315 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • 4.5x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (540 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    540 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 7.75 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (17.8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    17.75 hours vs 10 hours
  • 84.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3.72x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (67 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    67 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 2 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 6 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (8 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    8 vs 2
  • 7 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (8 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    8 vs 1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • 37.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (675 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    675 g vs 490 g
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 4.81x less popular
    Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 80.8% more expensive
    Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£470 vs £260).
    £470 vs £260
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 37.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (675 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    675 g vs 490 g
  • 34.36 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (209.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    209.66 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Frames by Murat
≈ estimated
24/09/2025
Hands-on review · display, software and daily use
Verdict
Oppo Pad 4 Pro is a solid, enjoyable tablet, though it is too large for some and lacks a few features.
Overview video
Not graded
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
notebookcheck.com
31/05/2025
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
04/06/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

  • High performance powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • Large, sharp 13.2-inch 3.4K display with 144Hz refresh rate
  • Exceptional battery life from a 12,140mAh cell
  • Immersive audio experience with an eight-speaker array
  • Premium build quality with a thin, sleek aluminum unibody
  • Excellent value compared to flagship competitors like iPad Pro
  • Seamless software integration with the OPPO ecosystem

What customers don't like about Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

  • No fingerprint reader, relying on 2D face unlock instead
  • Average camera performance, primarily suitable for documents/calls
  • Lacks an IP rating for water and dust resistance
  • No microSD card slot or SIM card support for cellular data
  • Heavier than previous models at 675g
  • Software is China-exclusive, requiring extra effort to install Google services
  • Missing GPS functionality

Verdict

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is a flagship-tier tablet featuring a large 13.2-inch IPS LCD display with a 144Hz refresh rate, a peak brightness of 900 nits, and a sharp 2400 x 3392 resolution. Under the hood, it is powered by the high-performance Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset paired with UFS 4.0 storage and runs on ColorOS 15 based on Android 15. Key highlights include its massive 12,140 mAh battery supporting 67W fast charging, a sleek 6mm aluminium body, and high-fidelity audio from an 8-speaker system. While it offers top-tier power and a smooth visual experience for gaming and media, notable drawbacks include the lack of an OLED panel, no cellular connectivity options, and the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD expansion.

Compare Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Pad 4 Pro (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found