OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£970Screen size:1.20 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Technical score

30%

8.2

Review score ( 5 · 3)

Review score 30% · 8.2 · based on 8 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–²Better than 56% of smartwatches
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

24%

3.2

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

3.9

Battery

14%

6.8

Smart features

12%

8.0

Connectivity

9%

7.8

Display & Design

4%

6.2

Hardware

â–²Better than 50% of smartwatches
8.2

Review score

Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Grades by review (8)
5 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

19.2%

7.0

techradar.com

15.4%

8.0

digitaltrends.com

15.4%

8.0

pocket-lint.com

≈ estimated
1

15.4%

9.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 2

7.7%

9.0

Digital Trends

3.8%

6.0

ABC TECHNO

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 76% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £970

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

24%

3.2

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

3.9

Battery

14%

6.8

Smart features

12%

8.0

Connectivity

9%

7.8

Display & Design

4%

6.2

Hardware

6.2
Review score
Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Grades by review (8)
5 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

19.2%

7.0

techradar.com

15.4%

8.0

digitaltrends.com

15.4%

8.0

pocket-lint.com

≈ estimated
1

15.4%

9.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 2

7.7%

9.0

Digital Trends

3.8%

6.0

ABC TECHNO

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 70.7% of smartwatches.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

5.4

Price

6.4
Brand name
Tag Heuer
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 66.8% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Battery life
1 days
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 1 days which is shorter than that of 87.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 8.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
5.5 h
Battery life in training mode
5.5 h
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 5.5 h in training mode which is shorter than 89.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.5% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
12.5 h
Battery life with GPS on
12.5 h
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 12.5 h with GPS on which is shorter than 67.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Battery power
393 mAh
Battery power
393 mAh
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 393 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 74.1% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (2).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
?
Show more
Screen size
1.2 inch
Screen size
1.2 inch
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.2 inch which is smaller than the screens of 85.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 390
Resolution
390x 390
â–² Better than 61% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x390 which is higher than that of 60.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Pixel density
460 ppi
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 460 ppi which is higher than that of 79.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
350 nits
Display brightness
350 nits
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 350 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 96.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
2x 0.8 GHz
CPU speed
2x 0.8 GHz
â–² Better than 68% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x0.8 GHz which is faster than that in 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 3100
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 3100
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (2).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 93 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    393 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (393 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    393 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Better case material
    Case material
    titanium
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This smartwatch uses titanium for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    grade 5 titanium case
    titanium vs polycarbonate
  • 134 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    460 ppi
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (460 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    Uses proprietary/non-standard band connector.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    rubber, leather
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses rubber, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    rubber, leather vs silicone
  • 4 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    41.0 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (41 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    41.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (2).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2 x 0.8 GHz
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x0.8 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    2x0.8 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon Wear 3100
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 3,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.1% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 13.75 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    5.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (5.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    5.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • 0.2 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.20 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.20 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 7.46x more expensive
    Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£970 vs £130).
    £970 vs £130
  • 18.1% worse value for money
    Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.36 vs 7.5).
    6.36 vs 7.52
  • 6.12x less popular
    Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.1% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 13.75 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    5.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (5.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    5.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • 7.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    12.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (12.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    12.5 h vs 20 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.1
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports an older Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • 0.2 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.20 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.20 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 22 g heavier weight
    Weight
    67.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (67 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    67.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 250 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (350 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    350 nits vs 600 nits
  • 1.6 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    13.20 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.2 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    13.20 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • 3 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2018 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    January 2018
    2018 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Digital Trends
≈ estimated
25/04/2018
Hands-on review · fit, screen, straps and design
Verdict
Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a well-finished Wear OS watch for smaller wrists, though it is expensive and runs standard Wear OS.
9.0
NewGadgets.de
≈ estimated
28/01/2018
Full review · unboxing, features, apps and battery tests
Verdict
Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 is one of the nicest-looking, well-built smartwatches around, now in a smaller size.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 5 · 5

Reviewers love the refined design and watch faces, but battery life and the software features let it down.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
08/03/2018
Hands-on test · Luxury Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a smaller, handsome Wear OS watch with a sharp screen and swappable straps, though its battery only lasts about a day.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
28/05/2018
Full review · Compact luxury smartwatch
Verdict
The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a compact, beautifully made smartwatch with a sharp display and swappable parts, best for buyers who put design first.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
08/03/2019
Buyer's review · Luxury smartwatch
Verdict
The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a stylish Wear OS watch for those who want a premium look, though its battery is its weakest point.
8.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
11/01/2022
Hands-on test · Modular luxury watch
Verdict
The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a light, well-made watch that suits men and women, but it lacks heart rate tracking and needs charging most nights.
9.0
newgadgets.de
≈ estimated
29/01/2018
Hands-on test · Smaller 41mm model
Verdict
The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a compact, good-looking version of the 45 for smaller wrists, though it needs charging every night.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41

  • Premium Swiss-made build quality that feels like a luxury mechanical watch
  • Highly customisable modular design allowing users to swap straps, lugs, and even the digital module for a mechanical one
  • High-resolution AMOLED display that is crisp, clear, and easy to read
  • Compact 41mm size is better suited for smaller wrists compared to the Modular 45
  • Improved performance and responsiveness due to upgraded RAM and storage over previous models
  • Water-resistant up to 50 meters, making it suitable for swimming

What we don't like about Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41

  • Significantly higher price point than other Wear OS smartwatches without offering unique features
  • Limited battery life that typically lasts only about one day and requires daily charging
  • Lack of a built-in heart rate monitor, which limits its utility as a serious fitness tracker
  • Bulky thickness (13.2mm) despite the smaller case diameter
  • GPS tracking can be inaccurate over long distances
  • Wear OS ecosystem can feel less polished compared to the Apple Watch interface

Verdict

The TAG Heuer Connected Modular 41 is a luxury Swiss-made smartwatch featuring a 41mm titanium case, a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal, and a 1.2-inch AMOLED display with a sharp 390x390 resolution (326 ppi). Running on Wear OS, it is powered by an Intel Atom processor with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage, and it includes GPS, NFC for contactless payments, and 50-meter water resistance. Its primary strengths are its premium build quality, highly customizable modular design that allows users to swap the digital module for a mechanical one, and a display that remains legible in bright sunlight. However, the watch is limited by a relatively short 25-hour battery life that requires daily charging, the absence of a heart rate monitor, and a high luxury price point compared to standard smartwatches.

Compare Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tag Heuer Connected Modular 41 and other Smartwatches

No results found