OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Noise Noisefit Twist Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Screen size:1.38 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Noise Noisefit Twist Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

4.9

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 1 · 10)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 11 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 76% of smartwatches
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

24%

5.9

Health

21%

4.4

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.4

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.2

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 87% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Grades by review (11)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

16.7%

7.5

indiatoday.in

Video reviews 10

8.3%

9.5

Indulge Express (indulgexpress)

8.3%

9.0

House of Tech

8.3%

9.0

Mr LazyTech

8.3%

9.0

Gadget Gig

8.3%

9.0

Techarsh

8.3%

9.0

BR Tech Films

8.3%

8.0

DAYbyDAY Tech

8.3%

8.0

IE Tech

8.3%

7.0

Budget Product

8.3%

7.0

Jstech

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 82% of smartwatches
  • noise-noisefit-twist
  • noise-noisefit-twist
  • noise-noisefit-twist
  • noise-noisefit-twist
  • noise-noisefit-twist
  • noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist
noise-noisefit-twist

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Noise Noisefit Twist

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

24%

5.9

Health

21%

4.4

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.4

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.2

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

4.9
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Grades by review (11)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

16.7%

7.5

indiatoday.in

Video reviews 10

8.3%

9.5

Indulge Express (indulgexpress)

8.3%

9.0

House of Tech

8.3%

9.0

Mr LazyTech

8.3%

9.0

Gadget Gig

8.3%

9.0

Techarsh

8.3%

9.0

BR Tech Films

8.3%

8.0

DAYbyDAY Tech

8.3%

8.0

IE Tech

8.3%

7.0

Budget Product

8.3%

7.0

Jstech

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Popularity:
Noise Noisefit Twist has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 93.2% of smartwatches.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Brand name
Noise
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Up to 7 days typical usage, ~2 days with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
300 mAh
Battery power
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 44.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 6.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Uses a proprietary OS with companion-app ecosystem support. OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.38 inch
Screen size
1.38 inch
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.38 inch which is smaller than the screens of 61% of smartwatches and equal to those of 0.8% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
Resolution
240x 240
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 73.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
246 ppi
Pixel density
246 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 246 ppi which is lower than that of 80.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
550 nits
Display brightness
550 nits
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 550 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 61.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 7.7% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Noise Noisefit Twist vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 17.4 g lighter weight
    Weight
    27.6 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (27.6 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    27.6 g vs 45.0 g
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • 63.4% more popular
    Noise Noisefit Twist has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 63.4% more popular
    Noise Noisefit Twist has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Noise Noisefit Twist is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 17.4 g lighter weight
    Weight
    27.6 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (27.6 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    27.6 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    Noise Noisefit Twist has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.15 vs 7.5).
    7.15 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 240
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x240 vs 352x430
  • 80 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    246 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (246 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    246 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 50 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    550 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (550 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    550 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.02 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.38 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.38 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 0.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Indulge Express (indulgexpress)
≈ estimated
17/03/2023
Hands-on review · features, display, calling and app
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Twist is a metal, feature-packed watch with a smooth interface that the reviewer calls excellent value for money.
9.0
House of Tech
≈ estimated
08/02/2023
Full review · connectivity, app, accuracy and cons
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Twist is worth buying at this price, with good connectivity and a good app, though the plastic build disappoints.
8.0
DAYbyDAY Tech
≈ estimated
13/01/2023
Hands-on review · features, health tracking and app
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Twist is among the best round-dial watches at its budget price, despite its plastic build and software that still needs optimisation.
9.0
Techarsh
≈ estimated
11/01/2023
Hands-on review · calling, sports and accuracy tests
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Twist is good value for a round-dial calling watch with solid sports modes, though battery life is short when calling.
9.0
BR Tech Films
≈ estimated
11/01/2023
Hands-on review · sleep, calling and app
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Twist is good value for a budget round-dial watch and worth considering at its current price.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 10

Reviewers call it good value with nice watch faces, but the display disappoints and battery and build split opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
indiatoday.in
✓ explicit
17/08/2023
Month-long test · Round-dial smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise NoiseFit Twist suits casual buyers who want a large, light round watch with up to a week of battery life, though its touch screen is slow to respond.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Noise Noisefit Twist

  • Excellent value for money at its budget price point.
  • Impressive battery life lasting up to 7 days on a single charge.
  • Vibrant 1.38-inch TFT display that remains readable in bright sunlight.
  • Lightweight and comfortable design despite its large dial size.
  • Functional Bluetooth calling with clear speaker output.
  • Comprehensive health suite including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep tracking.

What we don't like about Noise Noisefit Twist

  • Touchscreen response can be sluggish or slow to react.
  • Occasional syncing issues between the watch and the NoiseFit app.
  • The large 1.38-inch dial may feel oversized on thinner wrists.
  • Bluetooth calling is limited to a small number of saved contacts (approx. 10).
  • Lack of third-party app support (e.g., Strava or Google Maps).
  • Step counter can be over-sensitive, leading to inaccurate high counts.

Verdict

The Noise NoiseFit Twist is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.38-inch TFT round display with a metallic finish and a 240x240 pixel resolution. Its core characteristics include Bluetooth calling support via Tru Sync technology, an IP68 water-resistance rating, and a 300mAh battery that provides up to 7 days of typical use or 2 days with calling enabled. Main pros highlight its extensive health suite (SpO2, 24/7 heart rate, sleep, and stress tracking), 100+ sports modes, and lightweight 45g design that makes it comfortable for all-day wear. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, occasional syncing issues with the NoiseFit app, and a touch response that some users find slightly sluggish.

Compare Noise Noisefit Twist with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Noise Noisefit Twist and other Smartwatches

No results found