OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.55 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 19 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

5.5

Technical score

30%

6.3

Review score ( 7 · 12)

Review score 30% · 6.3 · based on 19 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 83% of smartwatches
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

24%

5.7

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

5.6

Battery

14%

3.4

Smart features

12%

3.2

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 71% of smartwatches
6.3

Review score

Review score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Grades by review (19)
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

9.6%

5.0

techradar.com

7.7%

7.0

pocket-lint.com

7.7%

5.0

androidcentral.com

≈ estimated
2

7.7%

7.0

sypnotix.com

7.7%

6.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 4

3.8%

9.0

TK Bay

3.8%

9.0

Jabber Tech

3.8%

8.0

TechMishka

3.8%

5.0

Martijn Wester

estimated from the review
7 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 97% of smartwatches
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth
mobvoi-ticwatch-gth

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

24%

5.7

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

5.6

Battery

14%

3.4

Smart features

12%

3.2

Connectivity

9%

6.2

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

5.5
Review score
Review score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Grades by review (19)
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

9.6%

5.0

techradar.com

7.7%

7.0

pocket-lint.com

7.7%

5.0

androidcentral.com

≈ estimated
2

7.7%

7.0

sypnotix.com

7.7%

6.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 4

3.8%

9.0

TK Bay

3.8%

9.0

Jabber Tech

3.8%

8.0

TechMishka

3.8%

5.0

Martijn Wester

estimated from the review
7 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.0
Brand name
Mobvoi
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
10 days
Battery life
10 days
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 63.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
18 h
Battery life in training mode
18 h
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 18 h in training mode which is shorter than 51.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
320 mAh
Battery power
320 mAh
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 320 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 57% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.55 inch
Screen size
1.55 inch
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.55 inch which is larger than the screens of 71.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
320x 360
Resolution
320x 360
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 320x360 which is lower than that of 55.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.3% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
311 ppi
Pixel density
311 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 311 ppi which is lower than that of 59.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 3 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    10 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 10 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.1 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.50 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 0.15 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.55 inch
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.55 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 3 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    10 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 10 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.1 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.50 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 0.15 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.55 inch
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.55 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 6.8 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.2 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.2 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.2 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 10 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    55.0 °C
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    55.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 6.9% worse value for money
    Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.03 vs 7.5).
    7.03 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 66 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    14
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (14 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    14 vs 80
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • Basic band material
    Band material
    silicone, tpu
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, tpu vs silicone
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TK Bay
≈ estimated
06/05/2021
Hands-on review · battery life and health tracking
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth is good value for budget fitness tracking, though it has some smartwatch shortcomings.
9.0
Jabber Tech
≈ estimated
05/05/2021
Hands-on review · several weeks of tracking tests
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth lacks GPS but is a very good fitness tracker, especially for people new to activity tracking.
5.0
Martijn Wester
≈ estimated
13/04/2021
Hands-on review · app, sleep, steps and battery tests
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth is not convincing yet: the hardware is promising, but software issues need fixing before it can compete.
8.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
13/04/2021
Hands-on review · sensors, sport modes and daily use
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth is a good smartwatch for health tracking, though it lacks GPS, an AMOLED screen and an always-on display.
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 7 · 13

Reviewers like the health sensors and long battery life, but the companion app frustrates and the lack of GPS disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
10/05/2021
Daily-use test · Health-monitoring watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH is a well-built square watch whose 24/7 health tracking is useful, but its heart rate, sleep data and notifications let it down.
5.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
08/05/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH tracks sleep well and lets you customize the watch face, but inaccurate distance and heart rate readings make it a poor pick for runners.
5.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
18/05/2021
Hands-on test · Health-focused watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH is an attractive, easy-to-use health watch for beginners that lasted six days between charges, but experienced users will run into its limits.
7.0
sypnotix.com
≈ estimated
10/06/2021
Daily-use review · Android smartwatch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH packs many health sensors into a light body that lasted 13 to 16 days, but its unreliable app makes syncing hit-or-miss.
7.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
20/05/2021
Daily-use review · Sensor-packed fitness watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH is a solid activity tracker with plenty of sensors, but its low-resolution screen and basic software keep it from feeling like a real smartwatch.
6.0
dday.it
≈ estimated
17/05/2021
Hands-on test · Health-tracking watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH lasts about ten days and tracks steps well, but its clunky app, lack of GPS and missing notification replies leave it trailing the Amazfit GTS 2 Mini.
4.0
daiunique.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Hands-on test · Health-sensor watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch GTH copies the Apple Watch look but is uncomfortable and slow to change faces, so it is hard to recommend as a daily watch.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 7 to 10 days on a single charge
  • Highly affordable price point, providing good value for a entry-level smartwatch
  • Includes a wide array of health sensors for the price, such as skin temperature and SpO2 monitoring
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking
  • Solid build quality featuring a metal case and 5ATM water resistance for swimming
  • Simple and straightforward user interface that is easy to navigate

What we don't like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth

  • Lacks built-in GPS, requiring a connected smartphone for distance tracking during outdoor activities
  • Basic notification system that only displays text; users cannot reply or interact with messages
  • Inaccurate or inconsistent readings from some health sensors, particularly heart rate and step counting
  • Proprietary magnetic charger can be finicky and disconnects too easily
  • The Mobvoi companion app is often described as outdated or prone to sync issues
  • Small 1.55-inch TFT display is surrounded by large bezels and lacks the vibrancy of AMOLED screens
  • Odd or 'wiry' font choice for notifications that some users find difficult to read

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch GTH is a budget-focused smartwatch featuring a 1.55-inch TFT touch display with 360 x 320 resolution, housed in a metal case with 5ATM water resistance. Key characteristics include its 24/7 health monitoring suite, which tracks skin temperature, blood oxygen (SpO2), heart rate, and respiration rate, alongside 14 workout modes and automatic activity detection. Its primary pros are an impressive battery life of up to 10 days from a 260mAh cell, a lightweight 32g design, and comprehensive health sensors usually found in more expensive models. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, a proprietary RTOS that lacks third-party app support, and basic notification features that do not allow for replies.

Compare Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi Ticwatch Gth and other Smartwatches

No results found