OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Michael Kors Access MKGO review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:1.19 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Michael Kors Access MKGO Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Michael Kors Access MKGO
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

35%

5.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.7

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 76% of smartwatches
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

24%

3.0

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

6.4

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 69%
5.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

5.7

Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.1

Average grade

20%

7.2

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
6 reviews + 3 videos, average 6.4/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 76%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • michael-kors-access-mkgo
  • michael-kors-access-mkgo
  • michael-kors-access-mkgo
  • michael-kors-access-mkgo
michael-kors-access-mkgo
michael-kors-access-mkgo
michael-kors-access-mkgo
michael-kors-access-mkgo
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Michael Kors Access MKGO

Based on 5 · 3

Light and comfortable on the wrist, but sluggish performance, poor calls and weak battery life drag it down.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Michael Kors Access MKGO

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

24%

3.0

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

6.4

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

5.7
Reviews score
5.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
15 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 15 h on a charge, which is shorter than 58% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
13.5 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 13.5 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 70.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.3% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
350 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 350 mAh battery, which is larger than 60.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
75 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 75 min, which is quicker than 77.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.8% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.19 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.19 inch screen, which is smaller than 92.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 390
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x390 which is higher than that of 56.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
463 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 463 ppi, which is higher than 96.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
1 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1 GHz which is faster than that in 30.1% of smartwatches and equal to that in 30.1% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 3100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model.
RAM
0.5 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 0.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 71.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 22.7% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Michael Kors Access MKGO vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 45 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (75 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    75 min vs 120 min
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supports external monitors over Bluetooth/BLE.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 137 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (463 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    463 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 4.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supports external monitors over Bluetooth/BLE.
  • 45 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (75 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    75 min vs 120 min
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 137 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (463 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    463 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 4.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 3,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 18.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

    5.7

    Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.1

    Average grade

    20%

    7.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    6 reviews + 3 videos, average 6.4/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.7 vs 7.0
  • 2.36x more expensive
    Michael Kors Access MKGO is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £110).
    £260 vs £110
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    Michael Kors Access MKGO has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.17 vs 7.8).
    7.17 vs 7.76
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 7.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (13.5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    13.5 h vs 21 h
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5
  • 0.21 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.19 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 20 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 10 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (55 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    55 g vs 45 g
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 84.4% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 50% less RAM
    This smartwatch has less RAM than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 1 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Juan Parisian
≈ estimated
01/06/2020
Unboxing · hands-on review · display and features
Verdict
Michael Kors Access MKGO is not perfect, but its display and design outweigh the lag, so it is worth trying.
7.0
Gino Buti
≈ estimated
05/02/2020
Hands-on review · design, fitness and performance tests
Verdict
Michael Kors Access MKGO is a stylish, affordable watch, but its performance is sluggish and its battery trails rivals.
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
30/10/2019
Hands-on test · Sporty smartwatch
Verdict
The Michael Kors Access MKGO is a light sports watch for runners and swimmers, but it lacks the punch of rivals and has no speaker.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
03/10/2019
Full review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Michael Kors Access MKGO suits Michael Kors fans who want a light, colorful watch for workouts, though its battery rarely makes it through a full day.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
12/11/2019
Hands-on review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Michael Kors Access MKGO is a water-resistant fitness watch with built-in GPS and tool-free straps, but sluggish performance and short battery life hold it back.
6.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
20/04/2020
Hands-on review · Sports smartwatch
Verdict
The Michael Kors Access MKGO is a light, comfortable watch with stylish faces for gym-goers who care about looks, but slow GPS and laggy software hold it back.
5.0
techsonar.de
≈ estimated
22/11/2019
Hands-on test · Fashion smartwatch
Verdict
The Michael Kors Access MKGO suits Android fans who want lots of fashion watch faces, but a slow processor, crashes and short battery make it a frustrating daily watch.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Michael Kors Access MKGO

  • Stylish and lightweight design specifically suited for active use
  • Sharp and vibrant AMOLED touchscreen display that is easy to read
  • Extensive selection of customisable Michael Kors branded watch faces
  • Includes essential features like built-in GPS, NFC for Google Pay, and heart rate monitoring
  • Water-resistant up to 30 metres, making it suitable for swimming
  • Rapid charging capability that can reach 80% battery in about 50 minutes

What customers don't like about Michael Kors Access MKGO

  • Poor battery life, often failing to last a full 24 hours with typical use
  • Noticeable performance lag and sluggishness when switching apps due to limited 512MB RAM
  • Lack of a built-in speaker, preventing phone calls or audible Google Assistant responses
  • Limited functionality when paired with iPhones compared to Android devices
  • Chunky profile that may appear oversized on smaller wrists
  • Occasional inaccuracies in heart rate tracking during high-intensity exercise

Verdict

The Michael Kors Access MKGO is a sport-focused Gen 4 smartwatch featuring a lightweight 43mm aluminum and nylon case paired with a comfortable silicone strap. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor with 512MB of RAM and 4GB of storage, running on Wear OS by Google. Key specifications include a vibrant 1.19-inch AMOLED display (390 x 390 resolution), built-in GPS, NFC for Google Pay, and an optical heart rate sensor. Its main strengths are its ultra-lightweight design, high-quality display, and swimproof water resistance up to 30 meters. However, notable drawbacks include subpar battery life that often fails to last a full day, occasional performance lag due to limited RAM, and the lack of a built-in speaker for taking calls.

Compare Michael Kors Access MKGO with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Michael Kors Access MKGO and other Smartwatches

No results found