OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Amazfit Bip Lite review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£55Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:45 daysDisplay type:Transflective LCD

Amazfit Bip Lite Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 32 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazfit Bip Lite
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

35%

4.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

4.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 75% of smartwatches
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 74%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

24%

3.5

Health

21%

5.3

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

3.0

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 91%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (32)
10 reviews + 22 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
  • amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
amazfit-bip-lite
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Amazfit Bip Lite

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers praise the long battery life and light, slim design, but GPS is poor and notifications are hit-and-miss.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Amazfit Bip Lite

Based on 179 owners sharing their experience in online comments

25%positive15%mixed60%negative

Owners most often praise the affordable price and long battery life, but frequent disconnections and fast battery drain dominate complaints.

What owners dislike

  • Bluetooth connection keeps dropping or failing22
  • Battery life drops sharply after some months, falling from about 30–40 days to a few days or even hours, with some owners reporting fast drain right after charging.19
  • The display can separate from the case or go blank, the screen looks washed out, and small text in notifications is hard to read.16
  • GPS starts slowly, and distance on runs and rides is often recorded short, sometimes by about a kilometre over 5 km, and tracked routes can stop partway.10
  • The Lite model has no built-in GPS, so runs only record distance when the phone is carried along.10
  • After a few years the battery swells, can push the screen out, and then stops charging, with owners reporting no repair options.8
  • Owners report the watch getting stuck on the startup screen or QR code after an app update or watch face upload, and some say it will not turn on again.8
  • Some owners find the watch stays in English or Chinese and cannot be switched to their language, with no Portuguese update available.6
  • Step counts rise when riding in a car or on a bike, and the watch also counts steps from arm movements and waving, or while sleeping.6
  • Owners say the watch is not reliably water-safe: water got in during swimming or showering, damaging the screen or battery, and the display can separate from the case.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Bip Lite

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

24%

3.5

Health

21%

5.3

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

3.0

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

4.6
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
45 days
Market range: <1 days – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 45 days on a charge, which is longer than 97.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
45 (under typical usage, can reach 120 in standby.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
200 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 200 mAh battery, which is smaller than 88.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 150 min, which is slower than 88.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 7.4% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS, which is more advanced than the system in 58.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 7% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.28 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.28 inch screen, which is smaller than 78% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
Transflective LCD
This smartwatch uses Transflective LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 68.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
176x 176
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 176x176 which is lower than that of 93.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
194 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 194 ppi, which is lower than 94.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Bip Lite vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 38 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (45 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    45 (under typical usage, can reach 120 in standby.
    45 days vs 7 days
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.3% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 27 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (18 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    18.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (32)
    10 reviews + 22 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20.0 mm vs 22 mm
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (32)
    10 reviews + 22 videos, average 7.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 38 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (45 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    45 (under typical usage, can reach 120 in standby.
    45 days vs 7 days
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.3% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 27 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (18 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    18.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20.0 mm vs 22 mm
  • 7.5 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (35 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    35.0 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 0.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (11 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    11 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.9% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 38.7% lower sentiment score
    4.6 vs 7.5
  • 4.3% worse value for money
    Amazfit Bip Lite has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.45 vs 7.8).
    7.45 vs 7.76
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.9% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 77.3% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 86 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (4 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    4 vs 90
  • No live tracking
    This smartwatch does not support live tracking, the average smartwatch does. 89.5% of smartwatches support live tracking.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 105 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (200 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    200 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 30 min slower charging
    This smartwatch charges more slowly than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (Transflective LCD vs AMOLED).
    Transflective LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 20 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 176x176, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    176x176 vs 360x360
  • 0.12 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.28 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 132 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (194 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    194 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
WesKnows
✓ explicit
22/05/2020
Hands-on review · running, sync and battery tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite lacks sport profiles and features, and its connection problems are frustrating; the large screen is its only strength.
9.0
The D Show
≈ estimated
12/11/2019
Hands-on review · one-week battery test and app
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite's battery life is its standout feature, and it ranks among the best smartwatches this reviewer has tested.
8.0
Tech Singh
≈ estimated
05/11/2019
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite suits buyers who want an always-on display, long battery life and a watch-style fitness tracker.
9.0
Ryan IWK
≈ estimated
25/09/2019
Hands-on review · display, menus and battery life
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite is a good budget smartwatch with a readable always-on display and long battery life, though its screen looks slightly soft.
9.0
Varun Nahar
≈ estimated
02/08/2019
Unboxing and review · two weeks of use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite is good value for a budget fitness watch, though the display and Bluetooth range are weak.
8.0
Perth WAtch
≈ estimated
20/09/2018
Hands-on review · two weeks of use and app tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite offers strong value and excellent battery life, though its features are basic and its activity choices limited.
9.0
Goods Gadgets & Gear
≈ estimated
09/04/2018
Long-term review · three to four weeks of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite is a good choice, with a clear watch face and useful sleep and step tracking.
8.0
Greg Toope
≈ estimated
04/10/2019
First look · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite is a cheap, fun little watch that looks worth the money for basic fitness tracking.
9.0
Mr Baz Reviews
≈ estimated
10/02/2018
Hands-on review · battery, app and display tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite offers very good value for a small watch, with its lower-resolution display as the main compromise.
7.0
Madhav Biju
≈ estimated
02/10/2019
Unboxing and first look · feature overview
Verdict
Amazfit Bip Lite is a good pick if you want a bigger screen and nicer looks than a fitness band.
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
21/11/2019
Real-world test · Heart rate
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a sporty watch whose battery lasts over a month, but its heart-rate and sleep readings can be off, so accuracy-focused buyers should look elsewhere.
9.0
cashify.in
≈ estimated
06/06/2022
Hands-on review · Battery and fitness
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a fitness-first watch whose battery lasts just over a month, suiting basic tracking and alerts rather than a full smartwatch.
7.0
notebookcheck.net
≈ estimated
26/01/2020
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a light, simple tracker with long battery life and 24/7 heart rate monitoring, but without GPS it suits everyday fitness more than route tracking.
5.0
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
30/03/2020
Practical test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a light tracker with a battery that lasted over a week in testing, but clunky controls and a dark screen hold it back.
7.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
14/11/2019
Lab test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a 28-gram watch whose battery lasts over a month, but its notifications are clumsy and it has no GPS of its own.
6.0
nerdsheaven.de
≈ estimated
05/07/2021
Experience report · Sport modes
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a slim watch with a readable display and weeks of battery, suiting runners and cyclists who don't need GPS.
8.0
android-user.de
≈ estimated
26/11/2019
Hands-on test · Setup and steps
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a plastic, always-on watch with heart-rate readings close to a Fitbit, but it counts fewer steps and needs your phone for routes.
7.0
techbook.de
✓ explicit
30/03/2020
Hands-on test · Battery and workouts
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a fitness tracker first and smartwatch second, on track for over 35 days of battery, but it has no apps and can't answer messages.
8.0
ilfattoquotidiano.it
≈ estimated
27/08/2019
Hands-on review · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a lightweight watch that runs over two weeks between charges, suiting basic fitness tracking, but it has no GPS and can't reply to messages.
9.0
ceotech.it
≈ estimated
10/10/2019
Long-term review · Battery life
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip Lite is a light tracker with long battery life that ran 11 days on one charge, suiting people who mainly want step and heart-rate tracking.
xiaomitoday.it
06/08/2019
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What we like about Amazfit Bip Lite

  • Exceptional battery life, with many users reporting 30 to 45 days on a single charge.
  • Transflective always-on display offers excellent readability in direct sunlight.
  • Extremely lightweight and comfortable for 24/7 wear, including during sleep.
  • Highly affordable price point compared to major competitors like Fitbit or Apple.
  • Water-resistant design (3 ATM to 5 ATM) suitable for swimming and showering.
  • Reliable basic notification alerts for calls, texts, and apps.

What we don't like about Amazfit Bip Lite

  • Lack of built-in GPS; requires a tethered smartphone connection to track workout routes.
  • Inconsistent accuracy for heart rate monitoring and step counting, sometimes showing unrealistic spikes or phantom steps.
  • Indoor screen visibility can be poor due to the dim nature of the transflective display without the backlight.
  • Limited smart features; users cannot reply to messages or answer calls directly from the watch.
  • Sleep tracking often fails to accurately record awake time during the night.
  • The Zepp (formerly Mi Fit) companion app is frequently described as cluttered or difficult to navigate.

Verdict

The Amazfit Bip Lite is an ultra-lightweight (32g) entry-level smartwatch featuring a 1.28-inch transflective always-on display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. It is designed for essential health tracking with a 24-hour PPG optical heart rate sensor, sleep monitoring, and support for four basic sports modes (running, walking, cycling, and treadmill). Its standout characteristic is an exceptional 200mAh battery providing up to 45 days of usage on a single charge, along with a 3 ATM water resistance rating suitable for splashes and light rain. Main pros include its extreme battery longevity, comfortable fit, and excellent outdoor screen readability. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS (requiring a connected smartphone for route tracking), a basic 8-color display with low resolution (176x176 pixels), and the inability to track swimming or reply to notifications.

Compare Amazfit Bip Lite with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Bip Lite and other Smartwatches

No results found