OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£610RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP

Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 58% of smartphones
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

25%

8.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.8

Camera

15%

7.1

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

4.1

Software

10%

6.6

Connectivity

4%

8.7

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

â–²Better than 60%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £610
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

25%

8.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.8

Camera

15%

7.1

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

4.1

Software

10%

6.6

Connectivity

4%

8.7

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

6.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

7.1
Brand name
Xiaomi
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor which is faster than processors in 75.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.84 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.84 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 68.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP which is higher than that of 81.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
41 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 41 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 54.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
395 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi which is higher than that of 41.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.9% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 89.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 78.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 5.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
120 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 120 W which is faster than in 94.4% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
17 min
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 17 min which is faster than 98.2% of smartphones and equal to the time of 0.4% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
163.8 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 163.8 mm which is taller than 53.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Width
76.4 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.4 mm which is wider than 60.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.9 mm which is thicker than 88% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Weight
220 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 220 g which is heavier than 81.7% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.7% of smartphones.
Device volume
111,492 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 111,492 cm³ which is larger than 83% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 34.8% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (14,533 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    14,533 vs 10,783
  • 3x higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (720 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    720 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 16x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    512 KB vs 32 KB
  • 20% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 45 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (17 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    17 min vs 62 min
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 34.8% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (14,533 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    14,533 vs 10,783
  • 16x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    512 KB vs 32 KB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 60.4% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,511 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,511 vs 942
  • 18.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • 85.3% higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (5,773 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    5,773 vs 3,115
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (5 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    5 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50.7% higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (1,489 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    1,489 vs 988
  • 3x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (768 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    768 vs 256
  • 48.6% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (3,763 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    3,763 vs 2,533
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 50.5% higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (5,756 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    5,756 vs 3,825
  • 16.4% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 23.7% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (1,517 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    1,517 vs 1,226
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • 28.1% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (41 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    41 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (20 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    20 MP vs 16 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 3x higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (720 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    720 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 20% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 300 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • 45 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (17 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    17 min vs 62 min
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 5.44x less popular
    Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.35x more expensive
    Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£610 vs £260).
    £610 vs £260
  • 4% worse value for money
    Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.05 vs 7.3).
    7.05 vs 7.34
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.5 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 24.5% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (498 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    498 nits vs 660 nits
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 12.1% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (220 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    220 g vs 196.2 g
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2021
    2021 vs 2024
  • 1.6 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 0.4 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.4 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.4 mm vs 76 mm
  • 14% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (111,492 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    111,492 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Simplified
≈ estimated
30/04/2022
Hands-on review · gaming performance and design overview
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro arrives late, but it is still a great gaming phone with fast charging and a strong screen.
8.0
NL Tech
≈ estimated
17/03/2022
Hands-on review · gaming performance, heat and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is still very powerful and worth it for its triggers, though heat and the wait for a successor matter.
9.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
22/01/2022
Hands-on review · gaming, temperatures, camera and battery
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is a very good gaming device that still makes sense to buy in 2022.
9.0
GS Beyond Reviews
≈ estimated
29/04/2021
Hands-on review · gaming, camera and comparison with standard model
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is preferred by the reviewer over the standard model for its performance, display and gaming feel.
8.0
Frankie Tech
≈ estimated
03/04/2021
Full review · gaming performance, throttle test, battery, camera
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is a great gaming phone, but it no longer feels unique compared with earlier models.
9.0
gizmochina
≈ estimated
28/02/2022
Hands-on review · gaming, battery, camera and charging tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is still one of the best gaming phones, though battery life is only average.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

androidcentral.com
23/02/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a fast, responsive gaming phone whose 720Hz touch and 144Hz screen suit competitive players, but its 4,500mAh battery falls short for all-day use.
techradar.com
27/03/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming performance
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is quick in games and charges very fast, but its thick, bulky body and unimpressive rear cameras limit its appeal.
tech360.tv
30/04/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming and battery
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a good all-rounder, with fast 120W charging, strong gaming performance and a 144Hz screen, though its cameras are only decent.
techadvisor.com
18/02/2022
Expert review · Gaming performance
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro has a responsive 144Hz screen and handy pop-up triggers, but its year-old Snapdragon 888 makes it a harder recommendation.
pocket-lint.com
18/02/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday use
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro suits gamers and movie fans with a bright screen, loud stereo speakers and pop-out triggers, though its cameras are only so-so.
howtogeek.com
15/04/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a budget gaming phone with a fast 144Hz screen and strong processor, but its interface is odd and storage can't expand.
netzwelt.de
23/02/2022
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro suits everyday phone use and gaming, with a fast 144Hz screen, but it gets warm and drains its battery quickly.
pcwelt.de
07/06/2022
Test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a gaming phone with a very good 144Hz screen and handy pop-up triggers, but its year-old Snapdragon 888 holds it back.
journaldugeek.com
25/03/2022
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a fun gaming phone with a 144Hz screen and pop-out triggers, suited to players who accept a bulky body.
generation-nt.com
23/02/2022
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a gaming phone with physical triggers and 120W charging that refills it in about 15 minutes, but its battery drains fast.
sotactile.fr
21/03/2022
Hands-on test · Gaming smartphone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is best for mobile gamers, with strong game performance and a comfortable grip, though its battery life is only average.
profesionalreview.com
24/02/2022
Full review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a gaming phone with a 144Hz AMOLED screen and a full day of battery, though its Snapdragon 888 is a year old.
smartworld.it
11/03/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a strong gaming phone with powerful hardware, good audio and fast charging, though its cameras are only adequate and battery life is modest.
tech.everyeye.it
02/05/2022
Hands-on review · Performance and charging
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a strong gaming phone with a 120W charger in the box, but its cameras sit closer to mid-range phones.
xiaomitoday.it
23/02/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a powerful gaming phone with a bright 144Hz screen, strong audio and a flashy back, though its Android 11 software is dated.
tuttoandroid.net
17/03/2022
Review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 4 Pro is a gaming phone with a smooth 144Hz screen and fast 120W charging, but its cameras and battery life hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB)

  • Stunning 144Hz AMOLED display with 720Hz touch sampling rate for excellent responsiveness.
  • Physical pop-up shoulder triggers are a game-changer for a console-like experience and add functionality beyond gaming.
  • Incredibly fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in around 15-20 minutes), with the charger included in the box.
  • Powerful and consistent gaming performance from the Snapdragon 888 processor, handling demanding games smoothly.
  • Great-sounding stereo speakers providing immersive audio with good bass.
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio, undercutting many competing gaming phones.
  • Useful and extensive gaming software features (Shark Space) for customization and optimization.
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Decent main camera (64MP) that produces good photos in adequate lighting conditions.
  • Solid build quality with a comfortable matte finish on the back.

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB)

  • Middling or abysmal battery life, often not lasting a full 24 hours with heavy use.
  • Uses an older-generation processor (Snapdragon 888) compared to some newer 2022 competitors at the time of its release.
  • Camera system is generally underwhelming, especially the low-light performance and nearly useless 5MP macro lens.
  • Slow software updates and a heavy, feature-packed JoyUI skin over an older Android version (initially Android 11).
  • Heats up noticeably when charging at the full 120W speed.
  • Phone is bulky and heavy compared to standard flagship phones.
  • No official IP rating for water or dust resistance, and no wireless charging support.
  • Some users report the physical triggers can accidentally pop open or be triggered when simply holding the phone vertically.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) is a high-performance gaming smartphone powered by a Snapdragon 888 processor, featuring a smooth 6.67-inch 144Hz AMOLED display for immersive visuals. Its standout hardware features include physical magnetic pop-up shoulder triggers, a powerful 120W fast charging system for its 4,500mAh battery, and an advanced "sandwich" liquid cooling system to maintain peak performance during intense gaming sessions. While highly praised for its speed and gaming-centric features like UFS 3.1 storage and LPDDR5 RAM, potential drawbacks include its significant weight and the lack of an official IP water resistance rating.

Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro (16GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found