OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:5.5 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP

Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5/10

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 93% of smartphones
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 91%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

25%

5.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

3.8

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

7.3

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

7.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 87%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £190
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

25%

5.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

3.8

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

7.3

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

7.9

Design

5.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

6.7
Brand name
Sony
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 processor model which is slower than processors in 83.6% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is lower than that of 91.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 which is narrower than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 1 SIM slots, which is fewer than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 3.7% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
5.5 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5.5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 97% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.8% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1496 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1496 px which is lower than that of 97.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
302 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 302 ppi which is lower than that of 77.5% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 78.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 5.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
140 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 140 mm which is shorter than 98.9% of smartphones.
Width
69 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 69 mm which is narrower than 98% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.9 mm which is thicker than 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Weight
162 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 162 g which is lighter than 96.5% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
77,280 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 77,280 cm³ which is smaller than 95.4% of smartphones.
Show more

Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 17.4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (162 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    162 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 23.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (140 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    140 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 7 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (69 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    69 mm vs 76 mm
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 36.8% cheaper
    Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 17.4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (162 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    162 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 7 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (69 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    69 mm vs 76 mm
  • 23.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (140 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    140 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 21% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (77,280 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    77,280 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 87.4% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (120 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    120 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 9% worse value for money
    Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.73 vs 7.3).
    6.73 vs 7.34
  • 5.44x less popular
    Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 87.4% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (120 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    120 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 71.4% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 14 GB
  • 68.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (985 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    985 vs 3,115
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 33.3% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (8 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    8 nm vs 6 nm
  • 66.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (848 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    848 vs 2,533
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (5 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    5 MP vs 16 MP
  • 1 fewer SIM slot/s
    This smartphone has fewer SIM slots than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 SIM slots.
    1 vs 2
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • No Galileo support
    This smartphone does not support Galileo, the average smartphone does. 98.7% of smartphones support the Galileo satellite system.
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1496 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1496 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 69.7% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (200 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    200 nits vs 660 nits
  • 23.5% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (302 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    302 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 2 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    May 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 0.6 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    Japan vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Critical Tech
≈ estimated
13/05/2022
First look · first impressions and hardware overview
Verdict
Sony Xperia Ace III suits novice and older users, but it is a basic entry phone with some clear flaws.
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9
9to5google.com
11/03/2022
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia Ace 3 leaks with tiny dimensions Are you looking for specific network compatibility info for using this Japanese model in your country?
C
community.sony.nl
01/03/2023
Summary of the review
Xperia ACE 3 for Europe: Importing to the Netherlands and 5G Compatibility
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB)

  • Compact size and form factor, easy to operate with one hand.
  • Excellent battery life (up to two days of use) due to a large 4500mAh battery and a 720p screen.
  • Durable build quality and solid feel, surviving drops well.
  • Features 5G connectivity, an IP rating (IP68 for some variants), and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus display (though scratch resistance is debated).
  • Nearly stock Android experience, which some users find fast and clean.
  • Processor performance is considered sufficient for basic tasks like messaging and browsing, and even some emulation with the right setup/software update.
  • Expandable storage via microSDXC card slot and a headphone jack are present.
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint sensor.

What customers don't like about Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB)

  • Severe multitasking issues and frequent background app crashes, likely due to limited 4GB of RAM and poor software optimization on the initial OS version.
  • Camera performance is poor, especially in low light, with slow focus and basic features (no wide angle or macro lens).
  • Display is dim and has faded colors, making it difficult to use in strong sunlight.
  • Security patches are often outdated or stuck on old versions (e.g., June 2022) unless manually updated via VPN.
  • Poor scratch resistance on the Gorilla Glass Victus screen, with normal use causing damage.
  • Comes with Japanese bloatware that needs to be removed using ADB.
  • Outdated design with large bezels and a teardrop notch.
  • Not officially available outside of Japan, requiring import and potential connectivity/software issues in other regions.

Verdict

The Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) is a compact, entry-level 5G smartphone primarily released in Japan, featuring a 5.5-inch HD+ display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus and powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G processor. Its main characteristics and pros include a durable build with IPX5/IPX8 water and IP6X dust resistance, a decent 4,500mAh battery that often lasts two days with normal use, and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via microSDXC (up to 1TB). Cons often mentioned by users include the HD+ display being dim and having lifeless colors, the single 13MP rear camera (plus 5MP front) performing poorly in low light, limited multitasking capabilities due to the 4GB RAM leading to background app crashes, an outdated design with large bezels, and the operating system security patches often being outdated.

Compare Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Xperia Ace III (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found