Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£720RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.9 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 12 MP

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB)
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 85% of smartphones
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

6.7

Price

â–²Better than 66%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

8.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.8

Camera

15%

8.1

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

9.4

Software

10%

8.5

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Audio

3%

7.0

Design

â–²Better than 85%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 69%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Smartphones model ranking

Ranked #82 of 2,002 models in Smartphones (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

8.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.8

Camera

15%

8.1

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

9.4

Software

10%

8.5

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Audio

3%

7.0

Design

7.9
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 6.2 points, which is higher than 56.3% of smartphones.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

6.7

Price

7.6
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Samsung Exynos 2500
This smartphone uses the Samsung Exynos 2500 processor which is faster than processors in 93.7% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.3 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 89.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 16
Android version
Android 16
This smartphone runs Android version Android 16 which is newer than that found in 95.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 4.4% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 12 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 12 MP which is higher than that of 57.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 which is narrower than that of 52.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
50 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 50 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 65.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 16.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1 µm which is larger than in 57.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 20% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
1
This smartphone has 1 SIM slots, which is fewer than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 3.7% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.9 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.9 inches which is larger than the screens of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2520 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2520 px which is higher than that of 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
397 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 397 ppi which is higher than that of 53.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Display type
?
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,300 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,300 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 86.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
25 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 25 W which is slower than in 66.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.3% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
166.7 mm
This smartphone has a height of 166.7 mm which is taller than 78.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
75.2 mm
This smartphone has a width of 75.2 mm which is narrower than 65.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Thickness
6.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 6.5 mm which is thinner than 98.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
188 g
This smartphone weighs 188 g which is lighter than 70.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2.8% of smartphones.
Device volume
74,700 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 74,700 cm³ which is smaller than 96.3% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Gemini Live, Now Brief, Now Bar, Best Face, FlexCam AI, Photo Assist, Zoom Slider, Real-Time Filters
    agentic vs fundamental
  • 37.5% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 49% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (16,072 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    16,072 vs 10,783
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 0.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.07 vs 8.000).
    8.07 vs 8
  • 3.2% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.57 vs 7.3).
    7.57 vs 7.34
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 37.5% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 49% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (16,072 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    16,072 vs 10,783
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 2,500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 3.56x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (9,015 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    9,015 vs 2,533
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This smartphone offers more CPU threads than the average smartphone (10 vs 8). The average smartphone supports 8 threads.
    10 vs 8
  • 4x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (16384 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    16,384 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 3.66x higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (2,225 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    2,225 vs 608
  • 74.5% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4800 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    4,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 4x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,024 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,024 vs 256
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.0.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 5.2% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (999 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    999 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Gemini Live, Now Brief, Now Bar, Best Face, FlexCam AI, Photo Assist, Zoom Slider, Real-Time Filters
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 16 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 16 vs Android 14
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 56.3% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (50 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    50 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 0.2 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.0 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Supports 3D photo/video
    This smartphone supports 3D photo and video capture, the average smartphone does not. 1.3% of smartphones offer 3D imaging capabilities.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.2 vs 2.0
  • Includes crash detection
    This smartphone features crash detection, the average smartphone does not. 5.7% of smartphones include automatic crash detection.
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Supports optical tracking
    This smartphone supports optical tracking, the average smartphone does not. 12.5% of smartphones include optical tracking.
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has HDMI output
    This smartphone supports HDMI output, the average smartphone does not. 4.1% of smartphones offer direct HDMI connectivity.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 1,600 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (2600 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    2,600 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2520 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2520 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 0.5% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (397 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    397 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1.8 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (6.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    6.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 4.2% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (188 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    188 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    July 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • 0.8 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (75.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    75.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • 23.6% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (74700 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    74,700 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower GSMArena battery life score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery life score than the average smartphone (11:52 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s). The average smartphone scores 13:30 hour/s.
    11:52 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • 2.77x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£720 vs £260).
    £720 vs £260
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Lacks multi-user mode
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average smartphone does. 96.4% of smartphones allow multiple user profiles.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 1 fewer SIM slot/s
    This smartphone has fewer SIM slots than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 SIM slots.
    1 vs 2
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • Lower GSMArena battery life score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery life score than the average smartphone (11:52 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s). The average smartphone scores 13:30 hour/s.
    11:52 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 24.2% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (25 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    25 W vs 33 W
  • 10% slower reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (4.5 W vs 5 W). The average smartphone speed is 5 W.
    4.5 W vs 5 W
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • 3.1 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (166.7 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    166.7 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
engadget.com
25/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
30/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
theguardian.com
30/07/2025
Summary of the review
M
mashable.com
26/07/2025
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
14/08/2025
Summary of the review
C
cnn.com
31/07/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
22/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
23/07/2025
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
08/08/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
12/08/2025
Summary of the review
R
racunalniske-novice.com
17/07/2025
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
24/07/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
24/07/2025
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
10/08/2025
Summary of the review
I
itdaily.fr
14/12/2025
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
03/11/2025
Summary of the review
P
presse-citron.net
02/08/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/08/2025
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
23/07/2025
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
03/02/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB)

  • Larger and brighter 4.1-inch outer cover screen is highly functional for notifications, widgets, and selfies.
  • Compact, sleek, and pocketable design that offers a satisfying feel when flipping it closed.
  • Inner 6.9-inch main display is vibrant, bright (up to 2,600 nits), and has a more comfortable 21:9 aspect ratio, similar to a regular smartphone.
  • Improved hinge design makes the crease barely visible and provides a sense of durability.
  • Main 50MP camera takes sharp, colourful photos in good light, and can be used for high-quality selfies via the cover screen.
  • Good day-to-day performance for average use, with a fast and smooth user interface (One UI 8/Android 16).
  • Guaranteed seven years of OS and security updates, which is a significant commitment from Samsung.
  • Durability is praised by some users who report the phone surviving drops and exposure to liquids (IP48 rating) with minimal damage.
  • Flex Mode is handy for video calls and multitasking, allowing the phone to act as its own stand.
  • Excellent network performance supporting Wi-Fi 7 and a full range of 5G networks.
  • Stereo speakers provide punchy, clear audio for media consumption and calls.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB)

  • The phone and processor (Exynos 2500) can get warm, especially during gaming, filming videos, or using DeX mode.
  • Cover screen software is limited and restrictive; some actions still require opening the main screen, a significant drawback compared to competitors.
  • Battery life, while improved in capacity from its predecessor, still typically only lasts one full day with normal use and may need an early evening top-off for heavy users.
  • Charging speeds are considered slow (25W wired) compared to many non-folding flagship phones.
  • Lacks a telephoto lens, meaning zoom shots beyond 2x result in a loss of detail and quality.
  • Inner screen is more delicate than a traditional glass slab phone and can be susceptible to scratches or crease-related issues over long-term use.
  • Not officially dust resistant, which poses a risk to the hinge mechanism.
  • Camera performance, while decent, is not on par with other flagship phones in the same price range, particularly in low-light situations.
  • The phone is expensive, and some users feel the build materials don't fully justify the premium cost.
  • Some basic functions like customizing quick settings on the outer screen or connecting to a new Wi-Fi network require the phone to be opened.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB model) is a premium, pocket-sized foldable smartphone powered by the Exynos 2500 processor and running Android 16 (One UI 8), featuring a large 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X main display and a significantly expanded 4.1-inch Super AMOLED cover screen, both with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. Key characteristics include a durable, thin design with an improved Armor FlexHinge, IP48 water resistance, a 4,300mAh battery, and a capable dual-camera system (50MP main and 12MP ultrawide). Pros highlight the brilliant, larger screens, enhanced durability, useful Galaxy AI features, and excellent software support; however, some cons noted are the lack of a telephoto camera lens, the use of an Exynos chipset which may have performance and heating issues under heavy load, and relatively slow 25W charging speeds.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found