OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£690RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:7 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)
8.3/10

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

90%

8.3

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

★Better than 92% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

â–²Better than 83%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

25%

9.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.6

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

8.3

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

★Better than 93%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 73%
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
  • motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
motorola-razr-60-ultra
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

25%

9.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.6

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

8.3

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

8.3
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 6.6 points, which is higher than 60.2% of smartphones.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

7.9
Brand name
Motorola
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor which is faster than processors in 95.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
4.32 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 4.32 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 96.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.0
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.0 which is narrower than that of 52.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
50 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 50 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 65.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 16.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1 µm which is larger than in 57.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 20% of smartphones.
2 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
7 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 7 inches which is larger than the screens of 97.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.2% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1224x 2912 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1224x2912 px which is higher than that of 87% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
417 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 417 ppi which is higher than that of 71.5% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
165 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 165 Hz which is higher than in 98.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 1.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,700 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,700 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 74.7% of smartphones and equal to those in 1.3% of smartphones.
Charging speed
68 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 68 W which is faster than in 76.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 1.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
yes
This smartphone supports aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
171.5 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171.5 mm which is taller than 90% of smartphones.
Width
74 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74 mm which is narrower than 82.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.2 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.2 mm which is thinner than 95.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Weight
199 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 199 g which is heavier than 55.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 3.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
88,578 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 88,578 cm³ which is smaller than 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 80% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Moto AI 2, Next Move, Catch Me Up, Remember This, Pay Attention, Image Studio, Playlist Studio
    agentic vs fundamental
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4500 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 7.1% better value for money
    Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.85 vs 7.3).
    7.85 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 80% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.32 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 3.12x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2,936 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,936 vs 942
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 11.77x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (12048 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    12,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 3.32x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 4.84x higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (5,938 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    5,938 vs 1,226
  • 6x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (192 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    192 KB vs 32 KB
  • 2.39x higher PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone achieves a higher PassMark score than the average smartphone (10,494 vs 4,389). The average smartphone PassMark score is 4,389.
    10,494 vs 4,389
  • 92.7% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (5300 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    5,300 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports ECC memory
    This smartphone supports ECC memory, the average smartphone does not. 2.4% of smartphones support ECC.
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 15.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1100 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,100 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 2x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8192 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    8,192 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.0.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Moto AI 2, Next Move, Catch Me Up, Remember This, Pay Attention, Image Studio, Playlist Studio
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 56.3% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (50 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    50 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (50 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    50 MP vs 16 MP
  • Supports Dolby Vision video recording
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision video recording, the average smartphone does not. 10.7% of smartphones support Dolby Vision.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • 0.2 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    2 binned
    1.0 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4500 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 2.26x higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1489 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,489 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.33 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1224x2912 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1224x2912 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 37.5% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • 595.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1489 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,489 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 5.6% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (417 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    417 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2.06x faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (68 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    68 W vs 33 W
  • 50% faster wireless charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    30 W vs 20 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Supports aptX Lossless
    This smartphone supports aptX Lossless, the average smartphone does not. 12.9% of smartphones include aptX Lossless support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.2 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.2 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74 mm vs 76 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    May 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 6% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4700 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 7.9 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.5 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.5 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 2.65x more expensive
    Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£690 vs £260).
    £690 vs £260
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China
  • 2.65x more expensive
    Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£690 vs £260).
    £690 vs £260
  • 1.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
    the average smartphone
    Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.89 vs 8.000).
    7.89 vs 8
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 6% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4700 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 7.9 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.5 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.5 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China
  • 1.4% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (199 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    199 g vs 196.2 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
sypnotix.com
25/08/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) Review
U
uswitch.com
07/11/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review - Uswitch
S
saiganak.com
06/05/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Razr 60 Review: Plus, the Model with the Dedicated AI Call Button!
T
techadvisor.com
08/05/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review: Wood You Believe It? - Tech Advisor
C
cnet.com
13/11/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) Review: Good, But Flipping Expensive
P
pcmag.com
15/05/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr Ultra Review: The Longest-Lasting Flip Phone - PCMag
G
galaxus.at
16/05/2025
Summary of the review
Razr 60 Ultra review: Motorola outdoes itself - Galaxus
I
itdaily.com
17/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review: in the Pocket - ITdaily.
C
clubic.com
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review: The best folding smartphone of the...
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - A flip phone with a high fun factor
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
03/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: The best flip phone on the market
(Translated)Show original
T
techgirl.nl
13/08/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review: Little to flip for with this flip phone
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
02/07/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola razr 60 Ultra review: almost perfect flip-foldable
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
03/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: the best flip phone on the market
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
20/05/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: striking flip phone keeps you hungry
(Translated)Show original
C
coolesuggesties.nl
09/08/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola RAZR 60 Ultra Review
(Translated)Show original
C
computertaal.info
14/10/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgetgids.nl
15/06/2025
Summary of the review
MOTOROLA razr 60 ultra Review 2025
(Translated)Show original
I
itdaily.be
17/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: in your pocket
(Translated)Show original
T
techfi.nl
17/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: a luxury gadget for those with money to burn
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

  • Ultra-compact, stylish, and premium design with high-quality materials like Alcantara and real wood options
  • Excellent, large, and highly functional external cover screen (4-inch pOLED) that allows use of almost all apps
  • Stunning internal 7.0-inch Foldable AMOLED main display with a smooth 165Hz refresh rate and high brightness
  • Flagship-level performance powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile Platform, providing smooth multitasking and gaming
  • Impressive battery life for a flip phone (4700 mAh), often lasting a full day or more with moderate use
  • Fast 68W wired TurboPower charging and 30W wireless charging support
  • Robust hinge mechanism that is durable and minimizes the screen crease when open
  • IP48 water and dust resistance rating, offering better protection than previous models
  • Good camera quality in ideal lighting conditions, with versatile shooting modes using the foldable form factor
  • Clean, near-stock Android 15 software experience with useful Moto Actions (gestures)

What we don't like about Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB)

  • High premium price point compared to some competitors and non-foldable flagships
  • Camera performance struggles in low light or with moving subjects, with noticeable motion blur and lack of optical zoom
  • Phone has a tendency to overheat during extended heavy use like gaming or prolonged cover screen use
  • Poor software update policy (three OS upgrades and four years of security updates) compared to some competitors
  • No charger brick included in the box, requiring a separate purchase to achieve maximum charging speeds
  • Proximity sensor issues reported by some users, especially with specific apps like WhatsApp audio messages
  • Lack of third-party accessories like quality cases and screen protectors
  • Audio quality from the stereo speakers is decent but lacks substantial bass
  • No expandable storage option (microSD card slot)

Verdict

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a premium, compact flip phone running Android 15, powered by the flagship Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, paired with 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB of UFS 4.1 storage. Its standout features are a large, versatile 4-inch, 165Hz external pOLED display and an expansive 7-inch, 165Hz foldable LTPO AMOLED internal display with a minimal crease. It boasts a dual 50MP rear camera system (wide and ultrawide) and a 50MP front camera, offering solid photo quality and 8K video recording capabilities. Key pros include a robust, IP48 dust and water-resistant build with a titanium hinge, class-leading battery life from its 4,700mAh cell, and fast 68W wired and 30W wireless charging. However, some potential cons are the lack of optical zoom in the camera system, the phone's tendency to heat up under sustained heavy loads like intensive gaming or video recording, and Motorola's shorter software update policy compared to some competitors.

Compare Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (16GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found