OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£210RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Review: Compare 196 technical specifications, 60 expert and video reviews and 9 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components

35%

6.6

Technical score

30%

8.2

List score

25%

6.6

Reviews score

10%

8.4

Sentiment score

▲Better than 50% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

▲Better than 70%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

25%

6.7

Performance

18%

5.9

Camera

15%

6.7

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

3.0

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

▼Worse than 53%
6.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models

6.6

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.4

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (60)
31 reviews: 24 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 29 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 70%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (9)
List score: in 9 of 243 lists (4%)
★Better than 96%
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
  • samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
samsung-galaxy-a16-5g-e10103893
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GBCheck price

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

Based on 31 · 31

Reviewers praise long software support, the screen and battery, but agree performance is sluggish and the speakers are weak.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

25%

6.7

Performance

18%

5.9

Camera

15%

6.7

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

3.0

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

6.6
Reviews score
6.6
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.9
Processor model
?
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 14.2% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 37.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.3% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android version
?
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
6 years
This smartphone promises 6 years of software updates, which is longer than 51.4% of smartphones and equal to 13% of smartphones.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 53.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.9% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 20.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 76.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.64 µm which is smaller than in 75.1% of smartphones and equal to the size in 18.7% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
?
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.6% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
6.7 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.7 inches which is larger than the screens of 51.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 10.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
387 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 387 ppi which is lower than that of 69.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.4% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.6% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 29% of smartphones.
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.2% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
What reviewers say
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not have stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones offer this.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not have a headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.3% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.9% of smartphones.
FM radio
?
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
164.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.4 mm which is taller than 62.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Width
77.9 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 77.9 mm which is wider than 81.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
?
Device volume
?
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (5 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    5 nm vs 6 nm
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.7% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 6.5% higher list score
    List score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (9)
    List score: in 9 of 243 lists (4%)
    8.2 vs 7.7
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.3 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.3 vs 5.2
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 6.5% higher list score
    List score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (9)
    List score: in 9 of 243 lists (4%)
    8.2 vs 7.7
  • 3.2% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.9 vs 7.7).
    7.9 vs 7.66
  • 7.7% higher sentiment score
    8.4 vs 7.8
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (5 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    5 nm vs 6 nm
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.7% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.3 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.3 vs 5.2
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.3% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.2% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 9.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models

    6.6

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (60)
    31 reviews: 24 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 29 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.3
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 75% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (64 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    64 vs 256
  • Lacks on-device AI
    This smartphone does not support on-device AI, the average smartphone does. 99.2% of smartphones include on-device AI processing.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 0.16 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    0.64 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 2% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (387 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    387 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.3% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.2% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP54 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP54 vs IP67
  • 1.9 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (77.9 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    77.9 mm vs 76 mm
  • 0.8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.4 mm vs 163.6 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
26/02/2025
Lab test · Affordable everyday phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G is an affordable phone with a bright display, solid battery and six years of updates, though gaming is choppy and the headphone jack is gone.
8.0
androidauthority.com
✓ explicit
20/02/2025
Hands-on test · Camera and updates
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G is an unexciting budget phone whose six years of updates make it the standout, though its camera features are basic.
7.5
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
15/06/2025
Hands-on review · Screen and updates
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G is a budget phone whose bright screen and six years of updates stand out, though 4GB of RAM and weak extra cameras hold it back.
7.0
consumerreports.org
≈ estimated
04/02/2025
Lab test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has an excellent screen and survived tumble and rain tests, but it is bigger than most rivals and its battery life is only average.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
02/01/2025
Hands-on review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a sound budget phone with six years of updates, but sluggish performance and weaker battery life hold it back.
7.0
gsmarena.com
✓ explicit
15/05/2026
Lab tests · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a budget 5G phone whose 4GB of RAM looks like the main worry for future use, though storage can grow via microSD.
7.0
tonicoftech.com
≈ estimated
06/09/2026
Two-year review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G suits light users who want a good screen, long battery life and six years of updates, but its 4GB of RAM feels slow.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
26/02/2025
Lab-tested review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G offers a vibrant screen, solid battery life and good cameras for the price, but its plastic build and weak gaming hold it back.
7.3
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
20/01/2025
Lab test · Budget Galaxy phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is great value for money, with a bright AMOLED screen and long update support, but it is not a gaming phone.
5.0
digit.in
≈ estimated
19/11/2024
Hands-on review · Everyday budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a practical, lightweight phone for basic use, but its 90Hz screen, single speaker and weak low-light camera feel dated.
7.0
gizmochina.com
≈ estimated
08/11/2024
Long-term review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a dependable budget 5G phone, with six years of updates and a full-day battery, though its camera is basic.
phonearena.com
10/01/2025
Not graded yet
6.0
chip.de
✓ explicit
27/02/2025
Lab test · Battery and camera
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a cheap 5G phone with long battery life and updates to 2030, but weak low-light photos and average performance hold it back.
7.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
01/02/2025
Lab test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G is a sensible budget phone with a strong screen and long updates, but sluggish performance and weaker battery life than its predecessor hold it back.
7.4
smartzone.de
✓ explicit
17/11/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G has a sharp AMOLED screen and a standout six-year update promise, but its 4GB of RAM feels too small for today's apps.
8.0
nextpit.de
✓ explicit
11/01/2025
Hands-on test · Battery life
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G lasts about two days on one charge and takes usable daytime photos, but its night shots, old connections and slow charging hold it back.
8.0
inside-digital.de
✓ explicit
10/01/2025
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A16 5G is a sturdy budget phone with strong updates and great battery life, but its 4GB of RAM causes stutters and low-light photos disappoint.
7.0
computerwoche.de
≈ estimated
08/02/2025
Hands-on test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a budget phone with an AMOLED screen and long update promise, but slow performance, weak extra cameras and short battery life hold it back.
6.5
androidworld.nl
✓ explicit
09/01/2025
Full review · Purchase advice
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G offers six years of updates and a good screen, but its slow processor makes the Samsung Galaxy A35 the better choice.
7.0
androidplanet.nl
✓ explicit
12/11/2024
Full review · Update policy check
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G suits buyers who want six years of updates on a budget, but it is slow and not bright enough in sunlight.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • Vibrant and bright 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Excellent battery life that often lasts a full day even with heavy use.
  • Commendable software support, with Samsung promising six years of OS and security updates.
  • Good camera quality for the price, producing clear and detailed photos in good lighting conditions.
  • Affordable price point, offering good overall value for a budget 5G phone.
  • Sleek and attractive design with a sturdy build quality and IP54 dust and splash resistance.
  • Ample 128GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD card slot.
  • Fast 5G connectivity speeds for streaming and browsing.
  • Easy to use interface, appreciated by various users including those less familiar with smartphones.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • Performance issues including stuttering and slowdowns, especially when multitasking or gaming, due to the budget processor and limited RAM (typically 4GB in US models).
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature that was present in some older budget Samsung models.
  • Single, bottom-firing speaker that can sound tinny and distort at high volumes.
  • The display is reflective and struggles in direct sunlight, and lacks HDR support.
  • Camera performance suffers in low-light conditions, producing blurrier details and muddy colors.
  • The 2MP macro camera is considered a largely useless addition by many users.
  • No charger brick included in the box, only a cable.
  • The phone can get warm during resource-intensive tasks like extended gaming sessions or fast charging.

Verdict

A 5000 mAh battery and a 6.7-inch OLED screen are the main reasons to look at the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, a phone that should go a long day between charges. The screen reaches 800 nits, so it stays readable in sunshine, runs at 90 Hz and is covered by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. It also includes a barometer, a sensor that is not common on phones like this. The trade-off is the camera and memory: the main sensor is small at 20.5 mm², the 4 GB of RAM can feel tight with many apps open, and there is no optical image stabilization, so video needs a steady hand. It suits someone who wants dependable daily use and a bright screen, and who is happy with daylight photos.

Compare Samsung Galaxy A16 5G with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and other smartphones

No results found