OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP

Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▼Worse than 74% of smartphones
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

▼Worse than 56%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

25%

5.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.3

Camera

15%

5.9

Display

15%

5.8

Battery

10%

7.5

Software

10%

6.6

Connectivity

4%

3.5

Audio

3%

6.1

Design

▼Worse than 80%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

★Better than 98%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

25%

5.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.3

Camera

15%

5.9

Display

15%

5.8

Battery

10%

7.5

Software

10%

6.6

Connectivity

4%

3.5

Audio

3%

6.1

Design

5.8
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 9.2 points, which is higher than 87.8% of smartphones.
9.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.3
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G99
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio G99 processor model which is slower than processors in 77.1% of smartphones and equal to processors in 3.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 68.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 14.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 53.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 20.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 76.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.64 µm which is smaller than in 75.1% of smartphones and equal to the size in 18.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.7 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.7 inches which is larger than the screens of 52.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 10.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2340 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2340 px which is lower than that of 68.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
385 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 385 ppi which is lower than that of 72.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
25 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 25 W which is slower than in 66.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.3% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
164.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.4 mm which is taller than 62.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Width
77.9 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 77.9 mm which is wider than 82.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
200 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 200 g which is heavier than 58.6% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.5% of smartphones.
Device volume
88,396 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 88,396 cm³ which is smaller than 70.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, AI Camera, Vision Booster
    productivity vs fundamental
  • 55.1% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4,266 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    4,266 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A16
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.21 vs 8).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A16
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.21 vs 8).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 70% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (9.25 vs 5.4).
    9.25 vs 5.44
  • 55.1% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4,266 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    4,266 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, AI Camera, Vision Booster
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.3 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.3 vs 5.2
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 16.9% higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark score than the average smartphone (919 min vs 786 min). The average score is 786 min.
    919 min vs 786 min
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 3.8% higher French repairability index
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (8.3 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    8.3 vs 8
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 23.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (719 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    719 vs 942
  • 71.9% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (345 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    345 vs 1,226
  • 8.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1,024 KB.
    512 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 31.6% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,732 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,732 vs 2,533
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • 33.2% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 0.16 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    0.64 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    13 MP vs 16 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 2.5% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (385 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    385 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2340 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2340 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 200 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    800 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 85.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (808 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    808 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 24.2% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (25 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    25 W vs 33 W
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP54 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP54 vs IP67
  • 1.9 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (77.9 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    77.9 mm vs 76 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China
  • 1.9% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (200 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    200 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.4 mm vs 163.6 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Whistlintech
≈ estimated
20/05/2026
Used-unit review · speakers, screen and daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is decent only as a kids' or backup phone; better phones exist for a main device.
8.0
Kevin Breeze
≈ estimated
09/01/2026
Hands-on review · camera, fingerprint and performance tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is still a worthwhile budget option in 2026, having aged well despite only small upgrades.
7.0
Leo Does Tech
≈ estimated
30/12/2025
Day-in-the-life test · 24 hours of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 holds up over a full day and handles everyday tasks, but zoom, flashlight and build are weak.
9.0
Leo Does Tech
≈ estimated
10/10/2025
Hands-on review · gaming, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is surprisingly capable for a budget phone, with smooth gaming and all-day battery life.
8.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
03/10/2025
Updated review · one year later · main-phone use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is a good choice for basic use with a strong screen, though it lags and has clear compromises.
5.0
Tech Titan
≈ estimated
10/08/2025
Long-term test · months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is a hard buy: performance slows and it crashes, so it only suits a tight budget.
7.0
Tech Titan
≈ estimated
05/04/2025
Long-term test · 3 months of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 has a solid display, but slow performance and weak low-light photos hold it back.
8.0
Smartphones 360 with RJ
≈ estimated
11/02/2025
Pros and cons review · display, camera, charging and radiation
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is good enough for most budget buyers who want stable software and useful features.
8.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
08/02/2025
Full review · daily use, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is a decent budget phone with long software support and a good screen, but it is not for everyone.
7.0
Eugoson Quorch
≈ estimated
19/01/2025
Hands-on review · battery, camera and display tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is a balanced, decent budget phone, with clear complaints about the notch and missing headphone jack.
6.0
Tech Reason
≈ estimated
13/01/2025
Camera test · walking and running video footage
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 has acceptable daylight photos, but low-light shots and video stabilisation fall short.
8.0
Izzi Boye
≈ estimated
12/12/2024
Hands-on review · performance, gaming, camera and battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A16 is a balanced budget phone with long software support, still recommendable despite a few drawbacks.
More graded video reviews (2)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidpolice.com
15/06/2025
Summary of the review
[Android Police] Samsung Galaxy A16 5G review: Focusing on what matters
G
gsmarena.com
29/11/2024
Summary of the review
[GSMArena] Samsung Galaxy A16 4G review
techadvisor.com
21/03/2025
Hands-on review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 suits buyers who want long battery life and six years of updates, but slow performance and weak cameras let it down.
G
gsmarena.com
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G review: Our lab tests - display, battery life, charging speed, speaker
A
androidpolice.com
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
The Samsung Galaxy A16 proves you just want a good phone
notebookcheck.net
20/04/2025
Lab test · Build and benchmarks
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 4G feels surprisingly well built for a budget phone and promises six years of updates, but it has no 5G and slow benchmark scores.
techpp.com
04/12/2024
Hands-on test · Dependable daily phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a dependable daily phone with a bright display and a good main camera, though it excels at none of them.
chip.de
27/02/2025
Lab test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a budget 5G phone with over 16 hours of battery life and updates to 2030, but weak low-light photos and average performance hold it back.
pcwelt.de
24/04/2025
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a well-built budget phone with excellent battery life and long software support, but sluggish performance and weak cameras hold it back.
computerwoche.de
03/05/2025
Hands-on test · Long-lasting budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a well-built budget phone whose two-day battery life and six years of updates outweigh its slow performance and weak cameras.
C
capital.fr
26/09/2025
Summary of the review
Is this sub-€160 Samsung smartphone worth it, according to our review?
(Translated)Show original
nerd-mobile.com
06/04/2025
Hands-on test · Upgrade over A15
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 4G has a bright OLED screen, strong main camera, and long software promise, but it looks and performs much like last year's A15.
A
andro4all.com
09/05/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A16 review - Andro4all
(Translated)Show original
andreagaleazzi.com
01/04/2025
Hands-on test · Light-use budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 suits buyers who want familiar Samsung software and light use, but its Exynos chip lags under heavy multitasking.
androidplanet.nl
12/11/2024
Full review · Budget Samsung phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a budget phone with six years of updates and all-day battery life, but weak secondary cameras and poor multitasking hold it back.
galaxyclub.nl
15/11/2024
Quick review · Long-support budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a fair-priced budget phone whose six years of updates and IP54 protection stand out, while its cameras and missing headphone jack disappoint.
notebookcheck.nl
21/04/2025
Lab test · Budget OLED phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 4G is a well-built budget phone with an OLED screen and six years of updates, held back by slow benchmarks and no 5G.
id.nl
10/12/2024
Hands-on test · Budget everyday phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a solid budget phone for daytime photos and a long update promise, but slow apps and night photos let it down.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB)

  • Vibrant 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate
  • Exceptional 6-year software update commitment for a budget device
  • Solid battery life that easily lasts a full day or more
  • Decent photo quality from the 50MP main camera in good lighting
  • Improved durability with an IP54 dust and splash resistance rating
  • Sleek and lightweight design that feels more premium than its price
  • Includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage up to 1.5TB

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB)

  • Occasional stuttering and lag, especially in the 4GB RAM base model
  • Lack of stereo speakers (single bottom-firing speaker only)
  • Removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack compared to previous models
  • Poor low-light performance and weak secondary (ultrawide/macro) cameras
  • Relatively slow 25W charging with no charging brick included in the box
  • Outdated teardrop notch design and thick screen bezels
  • No support for 4K video recording or optical image stabilization (OIS)

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A16 4G (4GB RAM + 128GB storage) is a budget-friendly smartphone featuring a large 6.7-inch Full HD+ Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 processor. It is equipped with a versatile triple-camera system, including a 50MP main sensor, a 5MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens, plus a 13MP front camera. Key pros include an impressive software support policy of six OS upgrades and six years of security updates, a substantial 5,000mAh battery with 25W fast charging support, and an IP54 rating for dust and splash resistance. Cons often mentioned by users and reviewers are that the performance can feel sluggish or stuttery at times with only 4GB of RAM, especially when multitasking or gaming, the charger is not included in the box, and video recording lacks electronic stabilization.

Compare Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy A16 (4GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found