OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 2 MP

realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 90% of smartphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

25%

4.7

Performance & Hardware

18%

4.9

Camera

15%

4.3

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

7.7

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.0

Audio

3%

6.3

Design

â–¼Worse than 90%
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.6

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 86%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone realme C65 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

25%

4.7

Performance & Hardware

18%

4.9

Camera

15%

4.3

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

7.7

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.0

Audio

3%

6.3

Design

5.5
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.6

Number of reviews

7.4
Popularity
Popularity
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 5.6 points, which is higher than 50.9% of smartphones.
5.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

6.9
Brand name
realme
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G85
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio G85 processor model which is slower than processors in 89.8% of smartphones and equal to processors in 1.5% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 57.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 57.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.6% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 20.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 76.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.64 µm which is smaller than in 75.1% of smartphones and equal to the size in 18.6% of smartphones.
1.28 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1604 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1604 px which is lower than that of 85.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.5% of smartphones.
Pixel density
264 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 264 ppi which is lower than that of 88.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.6% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 6.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
164.6 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.6 mm which is taller than 65.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Width
76.1 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.1 mm which is wider than 53.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.6 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.6 mm which is thinner than 86% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.5% of smartphones.
Weight
185 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 185 g which is lighter than 78.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
87,248 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 87,248 cm³ which is smaller than 75.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more

realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 5.3% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.7% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (185 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    185 g vs 196.2 g
  • 85.7% cheaper
    realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • 85.7% cheaper
    realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • 5.3% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.7% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (185 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    185 g vs 196.2 g
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 6.4% worse value for money
    realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.89 vs 7.3).
    6.89 vs 7.34
  • 8.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    realme C65
    the average smartphone
    realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.36 vs 8).
    7.36 vs 8
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 75% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 54.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (428 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    428 vs 942
  • 20.2% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (8,606 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    8,606 vs 10,783
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 34.5% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 47.8% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,322 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,322 vs 2,533
  • 86.8% lower 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in 3DMark Steel Nomad than the average smartphone (80 vs 608). The average smartphone scores 608.
    80 vs 608
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 68.8% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (320 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1,024 KB.
    320 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 47.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (13.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    13.41 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 81.3% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (48 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    48 vs 256
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.3% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • 0.16 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.28 binned
    0.64 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 33.2% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (264 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    264 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1604 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1604 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 24.2% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (500 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    500 nits vs 660 nits
  • 375 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (625 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    625 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP54 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP54 vs IP67
  • 1 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.6 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.6 mm vs 163.6 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
24/06/2024
Hands-on review · gaming, battery and features
Verdict
The realme C65 is a good all-round budget phone with excellent battery life, though biometrics could be better.
8.0
ReviewsPK
≈ estimated
01/08/2024
Unboxing and review · design, camera, chipset and software overview
Verdict
The realme C65 is very good value for the price, though weak for serious gaming and cluttered out of the box.
7.0
Cyril Dason Kerine (CyrilDason)
≈ estimated
08/07/2024
Video camera test · vlogging, zoom and low light
Verdict
The realme C65 shoots usable video for vlogs in good light, with noticeable shake and noise at night.
6.0
Tech Reason
≈ estimated
07/08/2024
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
The realme C65 has an average display for the price, with a bright screen and good colours.
8.0
Cyril Dason Kerine (CyrilDason)
≈ estimated
04/07/2024
Unboxing · first impressions of design and box contents
Verdict
The realme C65 looks premium and feels well balanced in hand; a full review will follow once it has been tested.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

gadgetmatch.com
01/07/2024
Three-week test · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 has strong battery life, fast charging and loud speakers, but laggy touch, a weak display and a poor camera make rivals the better choice.
yugatech.com
13/06/2024
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is good enough as a daily phone, with a very long battery and smooth gaming, but clumsy unlocking, bloatware and washed-out photos hold it back.
gadgetpilipinas.net
13/06/2024
Daily-use review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 suits people who mostly browse, stream and take photos and want a battery that lasts over a day, but it is not ideal for demanding gaming.
manilashaker.com
13/06/2024
Hands-on review · Everyday phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a good-looking, long-lasting phone for productivity and light gaming, though selfies look washed out and it comes packed with bloatware.
ilonggotechblog.com
01/06/2024
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a budget phone that lasts a full day, charges fast and suits everyday use, though it is not built for heavy gaming.
giznext.com
21/05/2024
Long-term review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The realme C65 5G is a versatile budget phone with a reliable processor and a battery that lasts all day, though charging is slow.
pinoymetrogeek.com
19/06/2024
Hands-on review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a stylish budget phone with a long-lasting battery and decent everyday performance, though its aging chipset makes multitasking stutter.
utterlytechie.com
15/06/2024
Two-week review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a reliable, long-lasting budget phone with a polished design and a surprisingly capable 50MP camera, though its 720p screen and single speaker feel lacking.
digit.in
01/05/2024
Full review · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The realme C65 5G is a slim budget 5G phone with a strong camera and long battery, though its HD+ screen and preinstalled apps hold it back.
2ndopinion.ph
17/06/2024
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a slim, long-lasting budget phone ideal for students and young professionals, though its speaker is average and night photos are only passable.
F
fr.accio.com
12/12/2025
Summary of the review
Realme C65 Best Sellers: 2024 Reviews and Trends
(Translated)Show original
fayerwayer.com
12/08/2024
In-depth test · Delivery-worker phone
Verdict
The realme C65 suits delivery riders and people working outdoors, thanks to its long battery, quick charging and grip, but its screen struggles in strong sunlight.
dplnews.com
17/08/2024
Daily use review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a light, good-looking phone with a long battery and handy air gestures, though its weak zoom and dated chip limit demanding games.
codigoespagueti.com
29/07/2024
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a light, stylish budget phone for everyday apps and games, but its HD+ screen and single rear camera show its limits.
los40.com.mx
10/09/2024
Hands-on review · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a sparkly budget phone with a long-lasting battery and quick charging, though its night photos and portrait blur need work.
smartphonology.it
27/05/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is good value for its price, with two-day battery life and good daytime photos, though its design closely resembles Samsung's S21.
tecnorecensioni.com
20/06/2024
Test review · Entry-level phone
Verdict
The realme C65 is a smooth, all-day entry-level phone with good daytime photos, but its HD+ screen looks dated today.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about realme C65 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Battery life is reliable and long-lasting, often staying powered for over a full day of moderate use.
  • Charging is exceptionally fast for its segment, featuring 45W SUPERVOOC technology.
  • Design is modern and aesthetically pleasing, with a slim, lightweight profile and unique light-reflecting finishes.
  • Daylight photography produces decent images with vibrant colors and accurate skin tones.
  • Includes useful entry-level features like IP54 water resistance and a dedicated 'Rainwater Smart Touch' mode.
  • Software experience is relatively modern, running realme UI 5.0 based on Android 14 out of the box.

What customers don't like about realme C65 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Display is a significant weak point, featuring only HD+ resolution (720p) which can lead to pixelated visuals.
  • Processor (Helio G85) is outdated for its price point and can struggle with demanding games or heavy multitasking.
  • Audio is limited to a single mono speaker, which lacks immersion and is easily covered when held horizontally.
  • Low-light camera performance is poor, with images frequently becoming grainy or losing detail.
  • System includes a substantial amount of pre-installed bloatware and shortcuts that clutter the interface.
  • Biometrics like the fingerprint scanner and face unlock are reported to be inconsistent or slow.

Verdict

The Realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) is a slim (7.64mm) 4G smartphone running Android 14 with Realme UI 5.0 and powered by an octa-core MediaTek Helio G85 chipset. Key features include a 6.67-inch, 90Hz IPS LCD eye-comfort display with HD+ resolution (720 x 1604) and an 8MP front camera. It boasts a 50MP AI main camera system, a large 5000mAh battery with 45W fast charging, and IP54 dust and splash resistance. Pros are its premium feel, fast charging for its segment, a large amount of storage (expandable up to 2TB), and innovative software features like Air Gestures and a customizable Dynamic Button. The main cons are the display's lower HD+ resolution (instead of FHD+) and the presence of a mono speaker, which can make for a less immersive multimedia experience compared to some competitors.

Compare realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of realme C65 (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found