OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.43 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP

Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartphones
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

25%

6.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.8

Camera

15%

5.5

Display

15%

6.4

Battery

10%

5.2

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

4.5

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

â–¼Worse than 72% of smartphones
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on 998 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 80% of smartphones
  • oppo-find-x5-lite-5g
oppo-find-x5-lite-5g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

25%

6.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.8

Camera

15%

5.5

Display

15%

6.4

Battery

10%

5.2

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

4.5

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

6.0
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on 998 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Popularity:
Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 7.7 points, which is higher than 72% of smartphones.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.2
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 900
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 900
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 900 processor model which is slower than processors in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 36.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 78.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4
â–² Better than 83% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 83% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.7 µm which is smaller than in 64.6% of smartphones and equal to the size in 10.4% of smartphones.
1.4 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.43 inches
Screen size
6.43 inches
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.43 inches which is smaller than the screens of 85% of smartphones and equal to those of 1.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
402 ppi
Pixel density
402 ppi
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 402 ppi which is higher than that of 61.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,500 mAh
Battery capacity
4,500 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 78.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 5.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
65 W
Charging speed
65 W
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 65.2% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 2.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
31 min
GSMArena full wired charge time
31 min
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 31 min which is faster than 92.6% of smartphones and equal to the time of 0.6% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
160.6 mm
Height
160.6 mm
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 160.6 mm which is shorter than 77.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
73.2 mm
Width
73.2 mm
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 73.2 mm which is narrower than 89% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.8 mm
Thickness
7.8 mm
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.8 mm which is thinner than 77.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.2% of smartphones.
Weight
173 g
Weight
173 g
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 173 g which is lighter than 91.5% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.5% of smartphones.
Device volume
81,760 cm³
Device volume
81,760 cm³
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 81,760 cm³ which is smaller than 91.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    10 W
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 31 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    GSMArena full wired charge time
    31 min
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <36 min – >120 min
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (31 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    31 min vs 62 min
  • 97% faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    65 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • 11.8% lighter
    Weight
    173 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (173 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    173 g vs 196.2 g
  • 6.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.53 vs 8.000).
    8.53 vs 8
  • 40.8% more popular
    Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.66 vs 5.4).
    7.66 vs 5.44
  • 30% cheaper
    Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£200 vs £260).
    £200 vs £260
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    10 W
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    Maximum RAM
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 2.4 GHz & 6 x 2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.4 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.4 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.25 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 1.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    402 ppi
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (402 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    402 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 31 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    GSMArena full wired charge time
    31 min
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <36 min – >120 min
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (31 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    31 min vs 62 min
  • 97% faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    65 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 11.8% lighter
    Weight
    173 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (173 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    173 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.8 mm narrower
    Width
    73.2 mm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (73.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • 0.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.8 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 3 mm shorter
    Height
    160.6 mm
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (160.6 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    160.6 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 16.4% smaller volume
    Device volume
    81,760 cm³
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (81760 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    81,760 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 900
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lacks multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 0.24 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.43 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.4 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.43 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • 1.4% worse value for money
    Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.23 vs 7.3).
    7.23 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 900
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Lacks multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 35.6% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    2006
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (2006 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    2,006 vs 3,115
  • 2.9% fewer transistors
    Number of transistors
    10,000 million
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <5.3k million – >19k million
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (10000 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    10,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • 50% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    128
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 11
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • No battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    App offloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    Scrolling screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    Play while downloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    Dynamic theme
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • 20.8% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    DxOMark Mobile score
    95
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <89 – >153
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (95 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    95 vs 120
  • 0.1 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    0.7 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.4 binned
    0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    31.4 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.24 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.43 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.4 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.43 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 258.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    GSMArena max display brightness
    635 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <537 nits – >1.4k nits
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (635 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    635 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 25% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    180 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <120 Hz – >480 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (180 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average smartphone has a sampling rate of 240 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 200 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    800 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    800 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 9.1% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    600 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (600 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    600 nits vs 660 nits
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,500 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP54
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP54 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP54 vs IP67
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    February 2022
    2022 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
22/06/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review - TechRadar
E
en.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review - Lots of Reno, (too) little Find X! Would you like a summary of the pros and cons found across these specific reviews, or ar...
T
techteamgb.co.uk
13/05/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G Impressions - TechteamGB Would you like a summary of the pros and cons identified across these specific test results? Yes, list p...
T
t3.com
11/05/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review: long-lasting, fast-charging - T3
D
dxomark.com
19/04/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Display test - DXOMARK
I
itwire.com
26/06/2022
Summary of the review
Review: Oppo Find X5 Lite lives up to its name - iTWire
D
dxomark.com
09/05/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Camera test - DxOMark
N
nextpit.com
05/04/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review: Just buy a Galaxy A52S - nextpit
T
trustedreviews.com
07/09/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Review - Trusted Reviews
T
techreviewer.de
25/03/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review – Lots of Reno, (too) little Find X!
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.de
05/04/2022
Summary of the review
Find X5 Lite im Test: Oppo selbst bietet bessere Alternative
(Translated)Show original
C
charlestech.fr
26/05/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Review: A complete and detailed opinion
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review - Lots of Reno, (too) little Find X!
(Translated)Show original
L
lesmobiles.com
26/08/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite smartphone review: A very well-balanced mobile
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
17/04/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G Lab Test: The family's youngest shows its versatility
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/04/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review: A junior model that succeeds without overdoing it
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
05/04/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Review: Yet another cloned smartphone sold for more
(Translated)Show original
F
fanaticosdelhardware.com
28/06/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite 5G Review: A Contender in the Mid-Range Ring
(Translated)Show original
D
diariodesevilla.es
09/05/2022
Summary of the review
Review: We tested the Oppo Find X5 Lite
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
11/04/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite review: a mid-range alternative with a design to fall in love with
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexperto.com
13/05/2022
Summary of the review
My experience with the OPPO Find X5 Lite after one month
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
21/08/2022
Summary of the review
I've tested the Oppo Find X5 Lite, an all-rounder aiming to be a bestseller
(Translated)Show original
I
it.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review - Lots of Reno, (too) little Find X!
(Translated)Show original
T
techzilla.it
03/08/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Review - Good at everything but doesn't stand out
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
13/05/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite Review: The "Little One" of the Family
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
25/07/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review: A smart choice for 425 euros?
(Translated)Show original
R
rush.nl
11/05/2022
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review: Stylish with a surprising...
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
22/03/2022
Summary of the review
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review - Plenty of Reno, (too) little Find X!
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
08/07/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite Review: Lots of Reno, (too) little Find X!
(Translated)Show original
S
smartphoneman.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Oppo Find X5 Lite review: Mid-ranger proves not to be a true Find X5
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
01/04/2022
Summary of the review
OPPO Find X5 Lite review: a solid mid-ranger
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 998 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely fast 65W SuperVOOC wired charging (full charge in around 31-35 minutes).
  • Excellent, long battery life, often lasting up to two days with normal usage.
  • Slim, light (173g), and easy-to-handle design.
  • Solid day-to-day performance and snappy responsiveness for general use and even demanding games like League of Legends: Wild Rift.
  • Bright and sharp 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, good color reproduction, and decent visibility in sunlight.
  • Good quality 64MP main camera with tasteful image processing and decent night mode shots (requires a steady hand).
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and a microSD card slot for expandable storage.
  • Comes with a charger and a basic case in the box, which is not always standard with other brands.
  • Dual SIM support offers flexibility.

What we don't like about Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Only a single, mono speaker which can sound tinny or harsh at higher volumes and lacks depth.
  • Performance is underwhelming compared to other mid-range phones in the same price bracket, especially for intensive gaming.
  • Ships with the older Android 11 operating system (though updates to Android 12 and 13 were promised).
  • Plastic build feels cheaper than some rivals, and the haptic (vibration) feedback is budget-grade.
  • Camera system is decent but lacks optical image stabilization (OIS) and the secondary ultra-wide and macro lenses are unremarkable.
  • 4K video recording is unstabilized and shaky; stabilization is only effective at lower resolutions (1080p).
  • Lacks an official IP rating for water resistance.

Verdict

The Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G is a sleek, lightweight mid-range smartphone featuring a 6.43-inch, 90Hz AMOLED display and a powerful 65W SuperVOOC wired fast charging system that can fully charge its 4,500mAh battery in about 35 minutes. It is powered by the octa-core MediaTek Dimensity 900 5G processor, paired with 8GB of RAM and a generous 256GB of expandable storage, ensuring smooth daily performance and multitasking. Photography is handled by a versatile triple rear camera system (64MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro) and a high-resolution 32MP front camera. A key pro is the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and the dual-SIM tray with a dedicated microSD card slot, which offers great flexibility. Cons include the all-plastic build and basic haptics that make it feel less premium than some rivals, the lack of an official IP water resistance rating, and the fact that its overall performance can be outmatched by competitors in the same price bracket.

Compare Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Find X5 Lite 5G (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found