OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.95 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 5 MP & 0.3 MP

CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB)
5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

6.4

User score

▼Worse than 98% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

▼Worse than 93%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

25%

4.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

5.1

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

5.2

Software

10%

5.6

Connectivity

4%

3.6

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

▼Worse than 97%
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 97%
  • cubot-max-3
  • cubot-max-3
  • cubot-max-3
  • cubot-max-3
  • cubot-max-3
cubot-max-3
cubot-max-3
cubot-max-3
cubot-max-3
cubot-max-3
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

25%

4.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

5.1

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

5.2

Software

10%

5.6

Connectivity

4%

3.6

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

5.1
User score
User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.4
Popularity
Popularity
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 4.7 points, which is lower than 55% of smartphones.
4.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

6.6
Brand name
CUBOT
Processor model
MediaTek Helio P22
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio P22 processor model which is slower than processors in 96.8% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 5 MP & 0.3 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 5 MP & 0.3 MP which is lower than that of 80.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 30.7 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.95 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.95 inches which is larger than the screens of 96.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1640 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1640 px which is lower than that of 77.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Pixel density
258 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 258 ppi which is lower than that of 98% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 93.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.8% of smartphones.
Fast charging
no
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
173 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 173 mm which is taller than 92.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
78 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 78 mm which is wider than 84.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.35 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.35 mm which is thicker than 84.7% of smartphones.
Weight
267 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 267 g which is heavier than 90.7% of smartphones.
Device volume
121,446 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 121,446 cm³ which is larger than 88.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 0.28 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.95 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2.36x cheaper
    CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 2.36x cheaper
    CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 0.28 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.95 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 10.4% worse value for money
    CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.64 vs 7.3).
    6.64 vs 7.34
  • 25.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    CUBOT Max 3
    the average smartphone
    CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (6.37 vs 8.000).
    6.37 vs 8
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 41.8% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1600 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • Supports older OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenCL version than the average smartphone (1.2 vs 2). The average smartphone supports OpenCL version 2.0.
    1.2 vs 2.0
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 19% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (20.7 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    20.74 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 5 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 5 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.3% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • 4.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • Lacks USB Type-C
    This smartphone lacks a USB Type-C port, the average smartphone includes one. 96.9% of smartphones use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 34.7% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (258 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    258 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1640 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1640 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 69.7% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (10 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    10 W vs 33 W
  • No fast charging support
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 36.1% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (267 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    267 g vs 196.2 g
  • 9.4 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (173 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    173 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    August 2021
    2021 vs 2024
  • 1.05 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.4 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.35 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (78 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    78 mm vs 76 mm
  • 24.2% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (121446 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    121,446 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
smartzone.de
24/10/2021
Summary of the review
Cubot Max 3 Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Large 6.95-inch immersive display suitable for media and [Netflix](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.amazon.co.uk/CUBOT-MAX-Smartphone-Unlocked-NFC-Green-Green/dp/B09J4YSYB5Use code with caution.json)
  • Excellent battery life, with many users reporting 2–3 days of use from the [5000mAh battery](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://us.amazon.com/Unlocked-CUBOT-Smartphone-Battery-Android/dp/B09GJMX3N7Use code with caution.json)
  • Great value for money, often cited as a more affordable alternative to brands like [Xiaomi](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.gsmarena.com/cubot_max_3-reviews-12327.phpUse code with caution.json)
  • Stock Android 11 experience with very little bloatware and [enhanced privacy controls](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.amazon.de/-/en/Smartphone-Without-Contract-Android-Display-black/dp/B09BCGBR1ZUse code with caution.json)
  • Support for [NFC Google Pay](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.cubot.net/phone/smartphones/Max-3Use code with caution.json), which is often missing in other budget devices

What we don't like about CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Low screen resolution (720p) for such a large size, leading to lower [pixel density (258 ppi)](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://versus.com/en/cubot-max-3Use code with caution.json)
  • Occasional performance lag and slowdowns when running [more than three apps](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://versus.com/en/cubot-max-3Use code with caution.json) simultaneously
  • Lack of software updates and [security patches](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.gsmarena.com/cubot_max_3-reviews-12327.phpUse code with caution.json) after purchase
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack, requiring users to use [Type-C earphones](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.gsmarena.com/cubot_max_3-reviews-12327.phpUse code with caution.json) or adapters
  • Limited [network band compatibility](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.reddit.com/r/mintmobile/comments/sdix38/cubot_max_3_on_mind/Use code with caution.json), specifically causing issues with certain US carriers like [Mint Mobile or Verizon](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://us.amazon.com/Unlocked-CUBOT-Smartphone-Battery-Android/dp/B09GJMX3N7Use code with caution.json)

Verdict

The Cubot Max 3 is an affordable Android 11 smartphone primarily characterized by its expansive 6.95-inch HD+ display and large 5000 mAh removable battery. Key specifications include a MediaTek MT6762 octa-core processor, 4GB of RAM, and 64GB of expandable internal storage (up to 256GB via TF card). It features a versatile rear triple-camera system with a 48MP main sensor, a 5MP macro lens, and a 0.3MP photosensitive lens, plus a 16MP front selfie camera. A major pro is the inclusion of NFC for Google Pay and the dual SIM capability, along with a side fingerprint sensor and face unlock for security. The main cons, according to user experiences, are that the phone can feel slow or experience occasional lag, has a lower screen resolution for its large size, and receives few to no software updates.

Compare CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CUBOT Max 3 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found