Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:6.5 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP

Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1/10

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

3.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

4.8

Camera

15%

3.7

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

5.2

Connectivity

4%

3.1

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

â–¼Worse than 99%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 68%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

3.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

4.8

Camera

15%

3.7

Display

15%

6.3

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

5.2

Connectivity

4%

3.1

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

4.8
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

8.1
Popularity
Popularity
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 8.1 points, which is higher than 77.3% of smartphones.
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.6
Brand name
Blackview
Processor model
Unisoc SC9863A
This smartphone uses the Unisoc SC9863A processor model which is slower than processors in 98.3% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
3 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 96.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.9% of smartphones.
Internal storage
32 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 97.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.6 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.6 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 95.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is lower than that of 91.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is narrower than that of 96.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.5 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 80% of smartphones and equal to those of 3.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1600 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1600 px which is lower than that of 87.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
270 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 270 ppi which is lower than that of 79% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,180 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,180 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 63.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.3% of smartphones.
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
no
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
164.2 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.2 mm which is taller than 59.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Width
62 mm
This smartphone has a width of 62 mm which is narrower than 99.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.1 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.1 mm which is thicker than 81.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Weight
183.6 g
This smartphone weighs 183.6 g which is lighter than 81.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
91,512 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 91,512 cm³ which is smaller than 67% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 3.6% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 18.8% higher French repairability index
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (9.5 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    9.5 vs 8
  • 14 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (62 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    62 mm vs 76 mm
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 5.78x cheaper
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£45 vs £260).
    £45 vs £260
  • 6.4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (183.6 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    183.6 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Blackview A52
    the average smartphone
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.06 vs 8.000).
    8.06 vs 8
  • 48.7% more popular
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.09 vs 5.4).
    8.09 vs 5.44
  • 5.78x cheaper
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£45 vs £260).
    £45 vs £260
  • 0.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Blackview A52
    the average smartphone
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.06 vs 8.000).
    8.06 vs 8
  • 48.7% more popular
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.09 vs 5.4).
    8.09 vs 5.44
  • 3.6% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 18.8% higher French repairability index
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (9.5 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    9.5 vs 8
  • 14 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (62 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    62 mm vs 76 mm
  • 6.4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (183.6 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    183.6 g vs 196.2 g
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 87.5% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 4.67x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (28 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    28 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 11.1% worse value for money
    Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.6 vs 7.3).
    6.6 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 87.5% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4.67x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (28 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    28 nm vs 6 nm
  • 5 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (3 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 82.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (164 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    164 vs 942
  • 50% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (3 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    3 W vs 6 W
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 33.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 66.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (933 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 69.8% lower PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (1,327 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    1,327 vs 4,389
  • 66.4% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (852 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    852 vs 2,533
  • 70.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (7.5 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    7.46 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 51.6% lower PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (478 vs 988). The average smartphone scores 988 for single-core performance.
    478 vs 988
  • Lacks NX Bit security
    This smartphone does not support NX Bit, the average smartphone does. 94.6% of smartphones support NX Bit.
  • Lacks ARM TrustZone
    This smartphone does not support ARM TrustZone, the average smartphone does. 98% of smartphones support ARM TrustZone.
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 50% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (5 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    5 MP vs 16 MP
  • No phase-detection autofocus (PDAF)
    This smartphone does not have phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), the average smartphone does. 97.6% of smartphones use PDAF.
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.3% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • No manual ISO control
    This smartphone does not allow manual ISO control, the average smartphone does. 98.4% of smartphones include manual ISO settings.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (4.2 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    4.2 vs 5.2
  • No gyroscope
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • Lacks USB Type-C
    This smartphone lacks a USB Type-C port, the average smartphone includes one. 96.9% of smartphones use USB Type-C.
  • No compass
    This smartphone does not have a compass, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones include a built-in compass.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 39.4% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (400 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    400 nits vs 660 nits
  • 31.6% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (270 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    270 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 600 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (400 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    400 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • No fast charging support
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    November 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 0.6 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.2 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.2 mm vs 163.6 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB)

  • Extremely affordable price point, often found for under $100
  • Large 5,150 mAh battery that typically lasts a full workday under light use
  • Decent 6.5-inch IPS display with good brightness and contrast for its class
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage
  • Physical fingerprint reader is reported to be reliable and fast
  • Lightweight and comfortable ergonomic design with a matte texture

What customers don't like about Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB)

  • Sluggish overall performance due to the weak Unisoc processor and limited 2GB RAM
  • Poor camera quality, especially in low-light conditions, with lacks in detail and sharpness
  • Very slow charging speeds and occasional reliability issues with the charging process
  • Lack of NFC functionality, meaning it cannot be used for mobile payments like Google Pay
  • Outdated software and a lack of consistent security or OS updates from the manufacturer
  • Single mono speaker is treble-heavy and provides a poor audio experience for music or media
  • Lacks Widevine L1 certification, preventing high-definition streaming on platforms like Netflix

Verdict

The Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB model) is a budget-friendly 4G smartphone running Android 12 (Go edition) with Doke OS 3.0, powered by a 1.6 GHz octa-core Unisoc SC9863A1 processor. Its key specs include a 6.52-inch HD+ IPS display with a 720 x 1600 pixel resolution, a large 5180mAh battery, a 13MP main rear camera, and a 5MP front camera. A major pro is its price point, offering essential features like dual-SIM support, a 3.5mm headphone jack, fingerprint and face unlock, and expandable memory (up to 1TB via microSD) for basic daily use. However, cons include limited onboard RAM and storage (only 3GB physical RAM and 32GB internal storage), a relatively slow processor that can feel sluggish with demanding tasks, slow Wi-Fi performance, a lack of NFC for contactless payments, and a microUSB port instead of the more modern USB-C.

Compare Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Blackview A52 (3GB + 32GB) and other smartphones

No results found