Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Headphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Dyson Ontrac Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:55 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):yes

Dyson Ontrac Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.9

Technical score

20%

8.0

User score

▲Better than 89% of headphones
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

8.5

Sound

20%

8.4

Features

10%

4.6

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

8.5

Battery

4%

8.6

Calls & Controls

▲Better than 89% of headphones
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 744 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 59% of headphones
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Dyson Ontrac

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

8.5

Sound

20%

8.4

Features

10%

4.6

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

8.5

Battery

4%

8.6

Calls & Controls

7.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 744 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Dyson Ontrac has a popularity score of 7.1 points, which is higher than that of 65.4% of products in this category.
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

8.2

Price

8.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
yes
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
yes
This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation. 72.6% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
6 Hz
Lowest frequency
6 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 6 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 84.5% of headphones and equal to 1.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
9
Number of microphones
9
This pair of headphones has 9 microphones, more microphones than 99.7% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5, newer Bluetooth version than 70.9% of headphones and equal to 13.1% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
70 ms
Audio latency
70 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 70 ms, lower audio latency than 62.5% of headphones and equal to 0.5% of headphones.
Multipoint support
no
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
yes
Ambient sound mode
yes
This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode. 75.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
yes
Companion app
yes
This pair of headphones works with a companion app. 78.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
55 hours
Battery life
55 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 55 hours, higher battery life than 77.6% of headphones and equal to 1.1% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
55 hours
Battery life with ANC
55 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life with ANC of 55 hours, higher battery life with ANC than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 1.6% of headphones.
Charging time
3 hours
Charging time
3 hours
This pair of headphones needs 3 hours to charge, higher charging time than 66.7% of headphones and equal to 20.8% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
2,540 mAh
Battery capacity
2,540 mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 2,540 mAh, higher battery capacity than 99.9% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Dyson
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
451 g
Weight
451 g
This pair of headphones weighs 451 g, heavier than 97.5% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
5.3
Clamp force
5.3
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 5.3, higher clamp force than 72.3% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Show more

Dyson Ontrac vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Active noise cancellation
    Active noise cancellation (ANC)
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Ambient sound mode
    Ambient sound mode
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    Companion app
    yes
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 12 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    6 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (6 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    6 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • Wear detection
    In/on-ear detection
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports wear detection, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.6% of headphones support in/on-ear detection.
  • More flexible connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 25 hours longer ANC battery life
    Battery life with ANC
    55 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life with ANC than the average pair of headphones (55 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    55 hours vs 30 hours
  • Water resistance
    Water resistance
    yes
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • 5 mm more spacious earcup height
    Earcup inner height
    65 mm
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup height than the average pair of headphones (65 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    65 mm vs 60 mm
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP51
    This pair of headphones has a better IP rating than the average pair of headphones (IP51 vs none). The average headphones have an IP rating of none.
    IP51 vs none
  • Active noise cancellation
    Active noise cancellation (ANC)
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • 12 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    6 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (6 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    6 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    0.1 %
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 25 hours longer ANC battery life
    Battery life with ANC
    55 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life with ANC than the average pair of headphones (55 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    55 hours vs 30 hours
  • 25 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    55 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (55 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    55 hours vs 30 hours
  • Quick charge support
    Quick charge
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 4.38x higher battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,540 mAh
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (2540 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    2,540 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • USB-C charging
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Play while charging
    Play while charging
    yes
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Has a rechargeable battery
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 80 ms lower audio latency
    Audio latency
    70 ms
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (70 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    70 ms vs 150 ms
  • AAC codec support
    AAC
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • LHDC support
    LHDC
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports LHDC, the average pair of headphones does not. 2.1% of headphones support LHDC.
  • Clear call microphone
    Noise-canceling microphone
    yes
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    On-device controls
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 8 more microphones
    Number of microphones
    9
    This pair of headphones has more microphones than the average pair of headphones (9 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    9 vs 1
  • Ambient sound mode
    Ambient sound mode
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    Companion app
    yes
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • Wear detection
    In/on-ear detection
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports wear detection, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.6% of headphones support in/on-ear detection.
  • 8 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2024 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    July 2024
    2024 vs 2016
  • 2.07x higher weight
    Weight
    451 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (451 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    451 g vs 218 g
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • Fixed cable
    Detachable cable
    no
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 8 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    94 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (94 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    94 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 4.89x more expensive
    Dyson Ontrac is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£440 vs £90).
    £440 vs £90
  • 1 higher clamp force
    Clamp force
    5.3
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    5.3 vs 4.3
  • 9 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    Sound pressure level
    94 dB SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (94 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    94 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 4.89x more expensive
    Dyson Ontrac is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£440 vs £90).
    £440 vs £90
  • 2.07x higher weight
    Weight
    451 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (451 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    451 g vs 218 g
  • Fixed cable
    Detachable cable
    no
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 1 higher clamp force
    Clamp force
    5.3
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    5.3 vs 4.3
  • 8 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    94 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (94 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    94 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 9 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    Sound pressure level
    94 dB SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (94 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    94 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
25/10/2024
Summary of the review
G
gethegoods.com
27/08/2024
Summary of the review
R
reviews.org
22/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
talksport.com
02/09/2025
Summary of the review
T
thedisconnekt.com
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
14/08/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
01/09/2024
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
12/11/2024
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
06/08/2024
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
15/08/2024
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
13/11/2024
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
31/07/2024
Summary of the review
M
manofmany.com
13/04/2026
Summary of the review
C
choice.com.au
28/10/2024
Summary of the review
C
consumerreports.org
27/09/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
31/07/2024
Summary of the review
H
hifi.de
30/07/2024
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
31/07/2024
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
16/10/2024
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
10/09/2024
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
18/07/2024
Summary of the review
P
pesesurstart.com
14/11/2024
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
17/09/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
31/07/2024
Summary of the review
O
on-mag.fr
20/08/2024
Summary of the review
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
08/08/2024
Summary of the review
L
larazon.es
30/12/2024
Summary of the review
H
hipertextual.com
14/08/2024
Summary of the review
T
tuttotech.net
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
C
corriere.it
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
W
wired.it
18/07/2024
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
29/10/2024
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
28/12/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 744 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Dyson Ontrac

  • Exceptional battery life (up to 55 hours with ANC on)
  • Extensive design customisation with interchangeable ear cushions and outer caps
  • High-quality, balanced sound with a wide frequency range (6Hz to 21kHz)
  • Highly effective Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) that competes with industry leaders
  • Unique and premium industrial design with high-quality build materials
  • Excellent weight distribution, making them comfortable for long listening sessions
  • Helpful 'sound exposure' tracking via the MyDyson app

What we don't like about Dyson Ontrac

  • Notably heavy (451g), which can cause crown or neck fatigue for some users
  • High premium price tag, especially considering customisation parts are an extra cost
  • Lack of multipoint Bluetooth connectivity (cannot connect to two devices simultaneously)
  • Fiddly and inconsistent touch controls for switching between ANC modes
  • Unconventional 'slimline' case provides limited protection from dust and scratches
  • Lacks advanced features found in competitors, such as spatial audio or a custom EQ
  • Bulky physical profile makes them less portable and uncomfortable around the neck

Verdict

The Dyson OnTrac are high-fidelity, over-ear noise-cancelling headphones featuring 40mm neodymium drivers with an expanded 6Hz–21kHz frequency range, 8-mic hybrid ANC reducing up to 40dB of sound, and a standout 55-hour battery life with ANC on, thanks to cells in the headband. Main pros include premium customizable design with over 2,000 combinations, exceptional comfort with microfiber cushions and balanced weight distribution, and high-clarity sound managed through the MyDyson app. Cons include a high 451g weight and bulky design, lacking multipoint Bluetooth support, inconsistent gesture controls, and a high $499 price point.

Compare Dyson Ontrac with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Dyson Ontrac and other products in the Headphones category

No results found