OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£780VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo

8.1/10

▲Better than 73% of graphics cards

7.6

▲Better than 62%

8.6

▲Better than 76%

?

No expert tests yet

?

Not in any best-of list yet

9.0
Gaming
Gaming
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures floating-point compute power, dedicated VRAM capacity, ray-tracing hardware, and modern PCIe generation bandwidth.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
25.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.5
Video editing
Video editing
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates hardware AV1 encoding support, generous video memory, raw compute power, and fast interface throughput.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
10
AV1 encode
30.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.0
1080p
1080p
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses pure rasterization power and VRAM balance optimized for consistently high frame rates at 1080p resolution.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
25.0%
10
VRAM
10.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.0
1440p
1440p
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures compute throughput, sufficient VRAM buffer, and ray-tracing performance tailored for sharp 1440p gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
30.0%
10
VRAM
15.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.1
4K
4K
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates ultra-high compute capability, heavy VRAM capacities, and advanced ray-tracing cores required for native 4K gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
35.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What owners say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo

Based on 209 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive9%mixed13%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming speed and generous memory, while demanding games and unstable tuning expose its main limits.

What owners like

Owners run most games at max settings at 1440p, often above 100 fps, and reach 4K around 70–90 fps with DLSS on.63
Undervolting, often to about 0.975V, lowers load temperatures and hotspot gaps, and many cards then stay in the 50s–60s°C.20
Owners moving from GTX 1080, 2070 or 3060-class cards report a large jump in performance, with many games running at max settings.18
Many cards boost near 2900–2950 MHz out of the box and accept memory overclocks of about +2000 MHz, with some core overclocks near 3000 MHz.11
Undervolting cuts power draw by roughly 50–120 watts while losing only 1–3 fps in many games, sometimes none.10
The 16GB of memory handles ultra settings and ray tracing at 1440p and ultrawide, with owners noting extra headroom over 8GB and 10GB cards.9
DLSS upscaling is praised for near-native image quality, and frame generation can lift frame rates sharply, though owners note some added input lag.9
Owners report benchmark results roughly 5–10% behind an RTX 4080, and overclocking can narrow the gap.7
Owners say ray tracing stays playable, holding around 60 fps at 1440p in demanding titles.3

What owners dislike

Aggressive undervolt or overclock curves can cause crashes, black screens or driver failures, and some owners found the set voltage did not hold.8
Applied curve settings sometimes don't hold: core clocks drop below the target, voltage stays above the set value, and memory clocks reset after applying.4
At 4K or 240Hz settings, owners often need DLSS or frame generation, and path-traced games can drop to around 30–40 fps.3
Some owners' undervolt presets cost noticeable frame rate, around 5–15%, in games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Resident Evil Requiem.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo

8.1

Show more

Hide

Performance

8.9

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

FP32 performance

Show more

Memory

8.5

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Effective memory speed

Show more

Features

9.6

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity

9.6

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power

8.2

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

285 W

Show more

Design

4.3

Show more

Hide

Size

356x 150.1x 71.4 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo vs the average graphics card

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

5.4% higher boost clock speed
This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
21.9% higher base clock speed
This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
26 more compute units
This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
66 vs 40
4 GB more VRAM
This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
16 GB vs 12 GB
82.3% higher texture rate
This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
26 more ray tracing cores
This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
66 vs 40
50.1% higher memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
64 bit wider memory bus
This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
256 bit vs 192 bit

5.4% higher boost clock speed
This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
21.9% higher base clock speed
This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
26 more compute units
This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
66 vs 40
82.3% higher texture rate
This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
26 more ray tracing cores
This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
66 vs 40
57.1% higher pixel rate
This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (253.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
253.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
32 more ROPs
This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
96 vs 64
95.1% higher FP32 performance
This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
80 more TMUs
This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
264 vs 184
120 more AI cores
This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
264 vs 144
63.4% higher PassMark score
This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (36,980 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
36,980 points vs 22,638 points
66.2% higher ray tracing score
This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (15,200 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
15,200 points vs 9,148 points
9.95x higher BF16 performance
This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
42.1% higher gaming score
This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (21,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
21,000 points vs 14,779 points

4 GB more VRAM
This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
16 GB vs 12 GB
50.1% higher memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
64 bit wider memory bus
This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
256 bit vs 192 bit
2x larger L2 cache
This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
48 MB vs 24 MB
12x more Infinity Cache
This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
48 MB vs 4 MB
10.5% faster memory speed
This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz

2x more transistors
This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45,900 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
45,900 million vs 22,900 million

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

Less advanced frame generation
This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
frame generation vs multi frame generation
73.7 mm longer card length
This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355.9 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
355.9 mm vs 282.2 mm
24.7 mm higher card profile
This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (149.7 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
149.7 mm vs 125 mm
1 slot/s wider design
This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
32.6% higher TDP
This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
285 W vs 215 W
25% slower VRAM clock
This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
Older Vulkan version
This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
1.3 vs 1.4
15.4% higher PSU requirement
This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
750 W vs 650 W

50% more expensive
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo is more expensive than the average graphics card (£780 vs £520).
£780 vs £520

25% slower VRAM clock
This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

Less advanced frame generation
This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
frame generation vs multi frame generation
Older Vulkan version
This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
1.3 vs 1.4
28.9% larger GPU die
This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (379 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
379 mm² vs 294 mm²

2 fewer monitors per output type
This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
1 vs 3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
5 vs 6

32.6% higher TDP
This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
285 W vs 215 W
15.4% higher PSU requirement
This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
750 W vs 650 W
20 °C lower thermal ceiling
This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (115 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
115 °C vs 95 °C
29.5% higher board power limit
This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
285 W vs 220 W

73.7 mm longer card length
This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355.9 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
355.9 mm vs 282.2 mm
24.7 mm higher card profile
This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (149.7 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
149.7 mm vs 125 mm
1 slot/s wider design
This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
97.2% heavier
This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2000 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
2,000 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Shop video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo

Vibrant RGB design with unique 'HoloBlack' lighting and customisable Spectra 2.0 effects.
Strong 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming performance, notably improved by 16GB of VRAM.
Effective IceStorm 2.0 cooling system that maintains low operating temperatures under load.
Excellent secondary features including DLSS 3.5, frame generation, and superior ray tracing.
Includes a functional GPU anti-sag support bracket and 12VHPWR adapter in the box.
Quiet operation at stock settings with a 'freeze fan' mode for silent idling.

What customers don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo

Significant physical size (triple-slot, over 300mm long) that may not fit in many standard cases.
Fan noise can become noticeable and loud once speeds exceed 60-70%.
Occasional reports of coil whine under high load conditions.
FireStorm software can be buggy, with some users reporting difficulty getting it to detect the card for RGB control.
Diminishing value compared to AMD alternatives for pure rasterization performance.
High power consumption compared to the non-Super model, requiring at least a 700-750W PSU.

Verdict

The ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. It boasts a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,640 MHz and 21 Gbps memory speeds, making it exceptionally capable for 1440p and 4K gaming with DLSS 3.5 support. Key pros include its striking 'HoloBlack' iridescent design with Spectra 2.0 ARGB lighting, an advanced IceStorm 2.0 cooling system with triple fans, and a dual BIOS feature for versatile performance modes. However, main cons involve its massive physical footprint, requiring approximately 3.5 slots of space and a length of 355.9mm, which may limit case compatibility, along with a high power consumption rated at 285W TDP.

Best alternatives

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Trinity

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super GamingPro OC

Graphics cards

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 9070 XT Limited Edition

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti AERO OC

Graphics cards

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Phoenix

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Phantom

Graphics cards

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super OG OC Edition

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Ventus 3X OC

Graphics cards

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7900 XT

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro S OC

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AMP Holo and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found