OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£970VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

40%

7.8

Technical score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

10

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 73% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

5.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

4.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

â–²Better than 64%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (7)
5 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-amp-extreme-airo
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-amp-extreme-airo
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO

Based on 5 · 2

Reviewers praise its cool temperatures and good overclocking, but agree it's very large and dislike its power connector.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO

Based on 214 owners sharing their experience in online comments

83%positive9%mixed8%negative

Owners praise its fast, efficient gaming, while limited memory can constrain demanding 4K play.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners get lower-than-expected frame rates, with results depending on the CPU, settings and whether DLSS is on; one reported GPU use stuck at 0%.12
  • At 4K with ray tracing and frame generation, the 12 GB VRAM fills, causing frame drops after leaving menus in games like Alan Wake 2.8
  • Some owners report freezes during intense scenes, forced game closes, full PC shutdowns, and brief black screens with lasting performance drops.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

4.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.8
Reviews score
8.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

5.4

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,980 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 22,980 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,425 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 14,425 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 69.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,581 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,581 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 76.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
31,000 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 31,000 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 96.2% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
40.09 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 72.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
21,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 21,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 61.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 67.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
303 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 303 W under peak load, which is higher than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
366 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 366 W, which is higher than that of 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
355.5x 149.6x 72.1 mm
Length
355.5 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 355.5 mm long, which is longer than 96.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
149.6 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 149.6 mm tall, which is taller than 93.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
355.5 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 355.5 g, which is lighter than 95.5% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 7.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 65.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 33.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (216 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    216 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 15.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 77% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (7)
    5 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.2
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 7.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 65.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 33.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (216 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    216 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 39.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31,581 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    31,581 points vs 22,638 points
  • 55.5% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (22,980 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    22,980 points vs 14,779 points
  • 57.7% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14,425 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    14,425 points vs 9,148 points
  • 2.57x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (31,000 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    31,000 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 64.9% lighter
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (355.5 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    355.5 g vs 1,014 g
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 73.3 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355.5 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    355.5 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 24.6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (149.6 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    149.6 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 66.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (366 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    366 W vs 220 W
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 86.5% more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is more expensive than the average graphics card (£970 vs £520).
    £970 vs £520
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 66.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (366 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    366 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 3.2 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (38.6 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    38.6 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 37.7% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (303 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    303 W vs 220 W
  • 73.3 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355.5 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    355.5 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 24.6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (149.6 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    149.6 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
CrazyTechLab
≈ estimated
20/02/2023
Hands-on review · cooling, noise, design and 4K benchmarks
Verdict
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO earns a recommendation mainly for its cooling and design, but the price premium and size are hard to justify.
9.0
Tech Critter
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Hands-on review · performance, thermals and power draw
Verdict
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is a fair buy for its performance, but it is pricey, bulky and needs a strong power supply.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
14/02/2023
Review · Factory-overclocked card
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is a factory-overclocked 1440p card with an eye-catching cooler, though 4K is only practical near max settings.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
04/01/2023
Lab test · Cooling-focused card
Verdict
The Zotac GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is strong in ray tracing and runs cool, but AMD's RX 7900 XT beats it in most games without ray tracing.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
04/01/2023
Lab test · Oversized triple-fan card
Verdict
The Zotac GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO runs very cool but is huge, and its memory bandwidth trails its predecessor, the RTX 3070 Ti.
9.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
22/06/2023
Lab test · Themed Spider-Man edition
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP AIRO SPIDER-MAN is a quiet, well-cooled card with an eye-catching backplate, but its overclock adds only 6–8%.
9.0
nexthardware.com
✓ explicit
04/01/2023
Benchmark test · Heaven and Superposition
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is aimed at high frame-rate 1440p gaming, but in benchmarks it trails the RTX 3090 Ti by up to 23%.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO

  • Exceptional thermal performance with very low operating temperatures even under heavy load
  • Near-silent operation, especially when using the secondary 'Quiet' BIOS mode
  • Highly aesthetic, fluid design with extensive and customizable RGB lighting zones
  • Factory overclocked boost speeds of up to 2.7 GHz for a performance edge over reference models
  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance and capable of handling 4K at high settings
  • Solid build quality featuring a premium metal backplate and a robust cooling solution
  • Virtually no reported issues with coil whine according to multiple user accounts

What customers don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO

  • Extremely large physical dimensions that may not fit in standard or smaller PC cases
  • Zotac's FireStorm software is frequently criticized by users for being buggy and difficult to use
  • Default BIOS fan curve is noticeably louder compared to competitors
  • High price point that sits significantly above the MSRP of base RTX 4070 Ti models
  • Narrow 192-bit memory bus can lead to lower performance scaling at 4K resolutions
  • Included 12VHPWR power adapter cables are noted by some users to be bulky or unattractive
  • Higher non-gaming power consumption compared to other custom 4070 Ti models

Verdict

The ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,680 CUDA cores, 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit interface, and a factory-overclocked boost speed of 2,700 MHz. Its signature aerodynamic design utilizes the IceStorm 2.0 cooling system with triple 110mm fans and a massive 3.5-slot heatsink, complemented by 24+3 power phases for enhanced stability and SPECTRA 2.0 ARGB lighting. Key pros include exceptional thermal management that keeps the card remarkably cool under load, a significant performance jump over previous-generation flagships, and the inclusion of DLSS 3 frame generation technology. However, it carries several cons, such as its enormous 13.5-inch length that may not fit in many standard PC cases, a premium price tag compared to other 4070 Ti models, and a lack of support for DisplayPort 2.0.

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMP Extreme AIRO and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found