OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):288 W

Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

40%

8.1

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.9

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 63% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

â–²Better than 86%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.0

Power

11%

9.3

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity

â–²Better than 70%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £480
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy

Based on 184 owners sharing their experience in online comments

74%positive11%mixed15%negative

Owners praise strong gaming and efficient power, while weak ray tracing and driver problems remain the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Stuck on FSR 3.1 or older with no FSR 4 upscaling; owners find FSR 3.1 grainy on details and struggle with modern UE5 games without upscaling.5
  • Some owners say recent drivers stop responding, and turning on an in-game FPS counter causes a big frame drop. Some games need driver fixes.4
  • Ray tracing is slow, around 30 to 50 FPS in this price range, so owners who want strong RT performance pick NVIDIA instead.4
  • Hotspot temperatures above about 70°C caused crashes for one owner, and fans get loud when the card reaches about 81°C.3
  • Some owners switching from NVIDIA report stutter and frame drops in certain games, sometimes with no clear cause found.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.0

Power

11%

9.3

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity

8.1
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
18,500 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 18,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 61.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,272 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 10,272 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 56% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,270 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 24,270 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 56% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
16,158 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 16,158 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 64.5% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
39.4 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 39.4 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 71.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
624.1 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 65.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
19,500 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,500 MHz, which is faster than that of 51.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to 15.6% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to 7.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 78.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
288 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 288 W, which is higher than that of 71.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
288 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 288 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 60.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
288 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 288 W, which is higher than that of 67.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
263 W
Show more
Size
327.9x 132.4x 53.4 mm
Length
327.9 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 327.9 mm long, which is longer than 79.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
132.4 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 132.4 mm tall, which is taller than 66.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal in width to 16.8% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,107 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,107 g, which is heavier than 56.2% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of Graphics cards.
Show more

Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 62.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (615.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    615.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 39.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 52.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (246.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    246.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 5.8% better value for money
    Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.85 vs 7.4).
    7.85 vs 7.41
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 62.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (615.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    615.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 52.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (246.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    246.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 2.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,565 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,565 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 74.3% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (39.4 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    39.4 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 2.56x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.23 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.67x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (78.8 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    78.8 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 39.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 39.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (624.1 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    624.1 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    256 KB vs 128 KB
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 2.5x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 34% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (288 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    288 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,624 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,624 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 45.7 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (327.9 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    327.9 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 15.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,624 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,624 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 24 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (120 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    120 vs 144
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 34% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (288 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    288 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 30.9% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (288 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    288 W vs 220 W
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 45.7 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (327.9 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    327.9 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 7.4 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (132.4 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    132.4 mm vs 125 mm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy

  • Excellent 1440p rasterization performance, often outperforming the RTX 4070 in non-ray-traced games.
  • Generous 16GB GDDR6 VRAM, providing better future-proofing for texture-heavy titles compared to 12GB rivals.
  • Aggressive pricing that typically undercuts NVIDIA's mid-range offerings.
  • Solid cooling design with a triple-fan setup and metal backplate that keeps temperatures manageable.
  • Modern connectivity features, including support for DisplayPort 2.1.

What customers don't like about Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy

  • Weaker ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA's RTX 40-series cards.
  • FSR upscaling is generally considered lower quality than NVIDIA's DLSS, especially at 4K.
  • Higher power consumption than its direct competitors from the green team.
  • Occasional driver stability issues reported by some users, leading to game crashes.
  • Minimal performance uplift over the previous generation RX 6800 XT in some scenarios.

Verdict

The Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy is a high-performance 1440p graphics card built on the RDNA 3 architecture, featuring 3,840 stream processors and a significant factory overclock with a boost clock of up to 2,565 MHz and a game clock of 2,254 MHz. It is equipped with 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit bus, providing 624 GB/s of bandwidth and 64MB of Infinity Cache to handle demanding textures and 4K entry gaming. Main pros include its robust triple-fan cooling system (100mm+90mm+100mm) with unique 'hypnotic' RGB rings integrated directly into the fan blades and a high-quality 14-layer PCB for improved signal stability. However, its main cons are limited global availability as it is primarily a Chinese market brand, a relatively high power requirement necessitating at least a 700W PSU, and ray tracing performance that still lags behind its NVIDIA counterparts.

Compare Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vastarmor Radeon RX 7800 XT Alloy and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found