Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£510VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.2

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

▲Better than 71% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

★Better than 92%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.6

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.8

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 71%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 67%
  • xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
  • xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
  • xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
  • xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
  • xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
xfx-quicksilver-radeon-rx-9070-oc-gaming-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.6

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.8

Connectivity & Media

8.2
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition has a popularity score of 5.9 points, which is higher than that of 58.3% of products in this category.
5.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
28,811 points
This graphics card scores 28,811 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
16,261 points
This graphics card scores 16,261 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 76.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
25,337 points
This graphics card scores 25,337 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 57.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,797 points
This graphics card scores 14,797 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
38.71 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 38.71 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
640 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 640 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 65.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 75.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
13.5 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 13.5 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
800 W
This graphics card recommends a 800 W PSU, which is higher than that of 81.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
304 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 304 W, which is higher than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
350x 140x 67 mm
Length
355 mm
This graphics card is 355 mm long, which is longer than 96.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
74 mm
This graphics card is 74 mm tall, which is shorter than 91.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,140 g
This graphics card weighs 2,140 g, which is heavier than 92.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 7.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2700 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 2.12x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (345.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    345.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2518 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 58.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 12.7% better value for money
    XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.11 vs 7.2).
    8.11 vs 7.2
  • 4% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition
    the average graphics card
    XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.32 vs 8.000).
    8.32 vs 8
  • 7.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2700 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 2.12x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (345.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    345.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 58.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 71.5% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (38.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    38.71 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 96.3% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (28811 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    28,811 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 77.4% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (16261 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    16,261 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.52x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.21 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.6x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (77.4 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    77.41 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2518 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 15 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (52 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    52 °C vs 67 °C
  • 51 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (74 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    74 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 70 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    355 mm vs 285 mm
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 23.1% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (800 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    800 W vs 650 W
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (8 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    8 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 23.1% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (800 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    800 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 35.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (304 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    304 W vs 225 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 70 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (355 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    355 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.1x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2140 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,140 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
eteknix.com
26/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
20/06/2025
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
26/07/2025
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition

  • High rasterization performance, often outperforming competitors in its class and matching higher-tier previous-gen cards
  • Excellent thermal management with temperatures frequently staying in the mid-50s°C under load
  • Quiet operation thanks to a massive triple-fan cooling system and effective fan curves
  • Sturdy build quality featuring a 14-phase PWM delivery and premium thermal materials like Honeywell PTM 7950
  • Understated and elegant aesthetic with an all-black design and minimal RGB lighting
  • Improved power efficiency compared to previous generations, allowing some users to avoid a power supply upgrade
  • Generous 16GB VRAM which is beneficial for modern titles at 1440p and 4K resolutions

What we don't like about XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition

  • Large physical dimensions (approx. 34.5 cm long) may cause clearance issues in smaller or even mid-sized cases
  • Obnoxious coil whine reported by some users, particularly when operating at extremely high frame rates
  • Limited overclocking headroom despite being a factory OC model, with safety features capping significant gains
  • Ray tracing performance still lags behind equivalent NVIDIA RTX cards
  • Included anti-sag bracket is noted to be too short for larger PC cases
  • Subjective shroud design described by some as a 'big, faceted piece of plastic'

Verdict

The XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition is a high-performance graphics card built on the RDNA 4 architecture, featuring 56 compute units, 3,584 stream processors, and 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus for bandwidth up to 640 GB/s. This factory-overclocked model delivers a boost clock of up to 2700 MHz and utilizes a massive 3.5-slot triple-fan cooling system equipped with a nickel-plated copper cold plate and 6mm heat pipes. Main pros include its exceptional efficiency with a 220W TDP, strong 1440p and 4K rasterization performance that rivals previous-gen flagships, and advanced features like FSR 4 and PCIe 5.0 support. On the downside, its substantial physical dimensions (over 13 inches long) may not fit in smaller cases, and the 'faceted plastic' shroud design is polarizing among users.

Compare XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Quicksilver Radeon RX 9070 OC Gaming Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found