Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):263 W

XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.1

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

▲Better than 72% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

★Better than 96%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 70%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 86%
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
  • xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
xfx-speedster-merc-319-radeon-rx-7800-xt-black-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

8.1
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition has a popularity score of 8.8 points, which is higher than that of 82.4% of products in this category.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,452 points
This graphics card scores 19,452 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,272 points
This graphics card scores 10,272 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 55.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,280 points
This graphics card scores 24,280 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 55.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
40,470 points
This graphics card scores 40,470 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 99.6% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
39.4 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 39.4 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 70.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
624 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 624 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 64.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
52.22 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 52.22 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
263 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 263 W, which is higher than that of 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
263 W
This graphics card draws 263 W under peak load, which is higher than 62.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.7% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
287 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 287 W, which is higher than that of 66.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
263 W
Show more
Size
326x 126x 58 mm
Length
326 mm
This graphics card is 326 mm long, which is longer than 78.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
126 mm
This graphics card is 126 mm tall, which is taller than 50.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.75 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.75 slot/s, which is wider than 67.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,440 g
This graphics card weighs 1,440 g, which is heavier than 70.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 61.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (615.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    615.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 39.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 50.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (246.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    246.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 39.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (624 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    624 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 13.4% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition
    the average graphics card
    XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.07 vs 8.000).
    9.07 vs 8
  • 13.4% better value for money
    XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.16 vs 7.2).
    8.16 vs 7.2
  • 2.08x more popular
    XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition is more popular than the average graphics card (8.76 vs 4.2).
    8.76 vs 4.22
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 61.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (615.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    615.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 50.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (246.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    246.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2565 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,565 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 74.6% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (39.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    39.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 3.35x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (40470 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    40,470 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2.56x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.23 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.65x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (78.8 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    78.8 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 39.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 39.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (624 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    624 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 2.61x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (52.2 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    52.22 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 8 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (59 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    59 °C vs 67 °C
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 15.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1624 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,624 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 41 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (326 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    326 mm vs 285 mm
  • 22.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (263 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    263 W vs 215 W
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 15.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1624 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,624 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 24 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (120 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    120 vs 144
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 22.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (263 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    263 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 27.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (287 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    287 W vs 225 W
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 41 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (326 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    326 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.25 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.75 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 41% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1440 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,440 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
06/09/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, often exceeding 100 FPS in demanding titles.
  • Superior cooling solution featuring a vapor chamber that keeps temperatures below 65°C under load.
  • Very quiet operation even during intensive gaming sessions.
  • High factory overclock providing a performance boost over the reference model.
  • Clean, premium build quality with a 'tuxedo' style aesthetic and solid aluminum backplate.
  • Generous 16GB VRAM buffer makes it suitable for future-proofing and high-res textures.
  • Includes dual-BIOS functionality for added reliability and tuning options.

What we don't like about XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition

  • Massive physical dimensions (approx. 34-35cm long) which may not fit in smaller cases.
  • Significant weight often leads to GPU sag, making a support bracket almost mandatory.
  • Higher power consumption compared to competitors like the RTX 4070.
  • Ray tracing performance is still generally inferior to comparable NVIDIA offerings.
  • FSR upscaling can occasionally appear blurry compared to DLSS in certain titles.
  • Lacks extensive RGB lighting, which may disappoint users seeking a more 'gamer' aesthetic.
  • Premium price point compared to the base RX 7800 XT MSRP.

Verdict

The XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition is a high-performance graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture, featuring 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a factory-overclocked boost clock of up to 2565 MHz and a game clock of 2254 MHz. It utilizes 3,840 stream processors and 60 compute units, delivering 624 GB/s of memory bandwidth and a 263W TDP powered by dual 8-pin connectors. Key advantages include its robust triple-fan cooling system with a vapor chamber and 14-phase VRM for superior thermal stability and overclocking headroom, alongside support for DisplayPort 2.1 and excellent 1440p rasterization performance. However, its significant length (roughly 335mm to 350mm) may lead to GPU sag and case compatibility issues, and it lacks the advanced ray tracing and AI upscaling efficiency found in competing cards.

Compare XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Speedster Merc 319 Radeon RX 7800 XT Black Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found