OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£490VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):260 W

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

40%

8.5

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.8

Sentiment score

▲Better than 70% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.9

Price

★Better than 94%
8.5

Technical score

Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

44%

8.6

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

9.3

Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity

▲Better than 75%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • powercolor-fighter-radeon-rx-7900-gre
powercolor-fighter-radeon-rx-7900-gre
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Based on 209 owners sharing their experience in online comments

66%positive20%mixed14%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming speed and tuning gains, while unstable VRAM overclocks and occasional driver issues frustrate them.

What owners dislike

  • Memory overclocks above about 2400 MHz often cause black screens, crashes or reboots, especially with fast timings, and many cards only stay stable near 2300–2350 MHz.29
  • Overclocking gains are often small, sometimes 1–2 fps or none, and some owners see no benefit beyond stock performance.13
  • Overclock or fast-timing settings can cause crashes, freezes or restarts during gaming or on the desktop, and some owners must return the settings to default.11
  • Driver updates can reset overclocks, cause black screens or driver timeouts, and sometimes stop the system from booting into Windows.7
  • Hotspot and memory junction temperatures often reach 70–84°C under load, and some owners need higher fan speeds to keep temperatures lower.6
  • Power draw can spike above 300 W, and some owners report draw of 330–340 W under overclock, which can strain older power supplies.5
  • Ray tracing runs noticeably slower than on Nvidia cards, and owners say it is only usable at low settings in a few games.4
  • Overclock profiles can revert after a reboot or driver update, so owners must reapply their tuning settings.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Technical score
Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components:

44%

8.6

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

9.3

Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity

8.5
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.9

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,000 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 20,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,465 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 11,465 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 60% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
27,198 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 27,198 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 64.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
27,219 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 27,219 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 91.6% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
46.96 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 46.96 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 80.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
576 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 576 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 62.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
18,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 18,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 51.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to 15.6% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to 7.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 78.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
260 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 260 W, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
260 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 260 W under peak load, which is higher than 62.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 60.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
260 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 260 W, which is higher than that of 60.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
260 W
Show more
Size
290x 111x 50 mm
Length
290 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 290 mm long, which is longer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal in width to 16.8% of graphics cards.
Weight
1927 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1927 g, which is heavier than 87.6% of Graphics cards.
Show more

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 96 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (160 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    160 vs 64
  • 2.27x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (366.9 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    366.9 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 94.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (733.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    733.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 7.2% better value for money
    PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.95 vs 7.4).
    7.95 vs 7.41
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 96 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (160 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    160 vs 64
  • 2.27x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (366.9 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    366.9 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 94.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (733.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    733.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 2.08x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (47 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    46.96 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • More FP64 throughput
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 3x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.44 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.26x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (27,219 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    27,219 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 3.18x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (93.9 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    93.92 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 35.3% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    20,000 points vs 14,779 points
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 28.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    256 KB vs 128 KB
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53,900 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 2.5x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 16 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (21 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    21 °C vs 37 °C
  • 11 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (56 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    56 °C vs 67 °C
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 33.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,270 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,270 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 8.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 20.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (260 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    260 W vs 215 W
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 33.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,270 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,270 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 79.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (529 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    529 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (260 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    260 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 18.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (260 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    260 W vs 220 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 90% heavier
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1927 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    1,927 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE

  • Excellent rasterization performance, often beating the RTX 4070 and 4070 Super in non-ray-traced titles
  • Great value for 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming with 16GB of VRAM
  • The triple-fan cooler remains extremely quiet even under full load
  • Features a robust build with a metal reinforced backplate and high-quality double ball bearings
  • Compact 2.5-slot design makes it easier to fit into various desktop cases compared to larger premium models
  • Efficient thermal management with full-load temperatures typically ranging between 50°C and 65°C

What customers don't like about PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE

  • Noticeably weaker ray-tracing performance compared to Nvidia counterparts like the RTX 4070 series
  • Memory speeds are artificially limited out of the box (18Gbps vs potential 20Gbps hardware rating)
  • Higher power consumption (260W TBP) compared to similarly performing Nvidia GPUs
  • Lack of features like DLSS 3 frame generation, relying instead on AMD's FSR suite
  • Minimalist aesthetic with no LED lighting, which may not appeal to users looking for RGB effects
  • Some users reported that Smart Access Memory (SAM) can occasionally cause performance issues in specific games if not configured correctly

Verdict

The PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE is an RDNA 3 graphics card featuring 5,120 stream processors and 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering strong 1440p and entry-level 4K performance. It includes a triple-fan cooling system with a copper base and dual ball bearings, maintaining a boost clock of up to 2,293 MHz with a 260W TBP. Main pros include its high rasterization performance that often beats the RTX 4070, excellent value for money, and a robust build with a reinforced backplate. Main cons include weaker ray-tracing performance compared to NVIDIA competitors, less efficient power consumption, and the lack of LED lighting found on more premium models.

Compare PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7900 GRE and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found