Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£790VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

8.2

Technical score

25%

8.1

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.9

Sentiment score

▲Better than 74% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

▲Better than 62%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

7.9

Memory

12%

7.7

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity

▲Better than 73%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (8)
6 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
  • powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-6900-xt
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What reviewers say about the PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

Based on 6 · 2

Reviewers praise its quiet fans and handy BIOS modes, but find it bulky, power-hungry and weak at ray tracing.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

Based on 256 owners sharing their experience in online comments

77%positive11%mixed12%negative

Owners praise its gaming speed and tuning headroom, while weak ray tracing and driver instability remain the main drawbacks.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report black screens during driver installs, crashes in Call of Duty and Fortnite, and freezes when games start.10
  • Ray tracing drops frame rates a lot in heavy games, and many owners switch it off to keep high frame rates.9
  • The stock power limit, around 255–320 W depending on the model, can hold clocks down in demanding games, and raising it with a tuning tool helps.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

7.9

Memory

12%

7.7

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity

8.2
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,826 points
This graphics card scores 19,826 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 64.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,792 points
This graphics card scores 10,792 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 58.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,728 points
This graphics card scores 26,728 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 60.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,356 points
This graphics card scores 14,356 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 55.2% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
23.04 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 51.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 512 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
16,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 16,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 63.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 13.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16 Gbps, which is slower than on 61% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
303 W
This graphics card draws 303 W under peak load, which is higher than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
900 W
This graphics card recommends a 900 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
480 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 480 W, which is higher than that of 95.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
320x 135x 62 mm
Length
320 mm
This graphics card is 320 mm long, which is longer than 73.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Height
135 mm
This graphics card is 135 mm tall, which is taller than 70.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal in width to 16.8% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,576 g
This graphics card weighs 1,576 g, which is heavier than 77.4% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 85.7% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (299.5 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    299.5 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 98.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (748.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    748.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    6 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 14.1% higher sentiment score
    8.9 vs 7.8
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 85.7% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (299.5 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    299.5 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 98.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (748.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    748.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • More FP64 throughput
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 3x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.44 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 34.1% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (19,826 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    19,826 points vs 14,779 points
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 32x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    128 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    1 vs 0
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 6.6% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 38.5% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (900 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    900 W vs 650 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 51.9% more expensive
    PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT is more expensive than the average graphics card (£790 vs £520).
    £790 vs £520
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 6.6% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    80 vs 144
  • 3 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    December 2020
    2020 vs 2023
  • 4.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,825 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,825 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3
  • 76.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (520 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    520 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 38.5% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (900 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    900 W vs 650 W
  • 2.18x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (480 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    480 W vs 220 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 37.7% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (303 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    303 W vs 220 W
  • 37.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (320 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    320 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (135 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    135 mm vs 125 mm
  • 55.4% heavier
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1,576 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    1,576 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
R-Tech Gaming
≈ estimated
16/03/2024
Hands-on review · game tests, setup problems and used buy
Verdict
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT is a good second-hand buy and a big upgrade for years of gaming.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
13/04/2021
Hardware review · Binned flagship
Verdict
The PowerColor Red Devil Ultimate Radeon RX 6900 XT is a huge flagship with a factory-binned chip that boosts higher and keeps its fans off below 60°C.
7.0
futurefive.co.nz
≈ estimated
04/11/2021
Hands-on review · 4K gaming tests
Verdict
The PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT Ultimate is close to the RTX 3090 in many 4K games, but trails in ray tracing and needs a large case.
8.6
thepcenthusiast.com
✓ explicit
29/12/2021
Hands-on review · 1440p and 4K tests
Verdict
The PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT Ultimate is a fast flagship for 1440p and 4K, but gets loud under heavy load and may trail in ray tracing.
8.0
pcmasters.de
≈ estimated
17/09/2021
Benchmark test · Oversized cooler
Verdict
The PowerColor Radeon RX 6900 XT Red Devil Ultimate is quiet at stock speeds and strong at 4K without ray tracing, but heavy and trails Nvidia in ray tracing.
8.0
overclocking.com
≈ estimated
18/01/2021
Lab test · Custom cooling
Verdict
The PowerColor RX 6900 XT Red Devil is a heavy three-slot card with two BIOS modes and a 16-phase power circuit, best for buyers with a large case.
6.0
overclocking.com
≈ estimated
13/04/2021
Lab test · Binned chip edition
Verdict
The PowerColor RX 6900 XT Red Devil Ultimate is the standard Red Devil with a sorted chip that clocks higher, which suits overclockers who want headroom.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

  • Exceptional rasterisation performance, trading blows with the NVIDIA RTX 3090 in many games
  • Highly effective triple-fan cooling system that keeps temperatures mostly under 65-70°C
  • Quiet operation under load with a dedicated silent BIOS mode
  • Sturdy 'built like a tank' construction and attractive aesthetic with customisable RGB lighting
  • Premium components and binned GPUs for better overclocking potential
  • Dual BIOS switch allows for easy toggling between performance and silent profiles

What customers don't like about PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

  • Significantly weaker ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA's RTX 30 series equivalents
  • Lacks a hardware equivalent to NVIDIA DLSS, making it less future-proof for ray-traced titles
  • High power requirements, with some users needing at least a 900W power supply
  • Massive physical size ('thicc' design) may not fit in smaller or even some standard ATX cases
  • Noticeable coil whine/squeal reported by some users, especially at high framerates
  • Potential for driver stability issues, including occasional black screens or crashes with certain software versions

Verdict

The PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT is a high-performance graphics card built on AMD's RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 5120 stream processors, 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, and 128MB of AMD Infinity Cache. Designed for elite 4K gaming, it boasts a substantial factory overclock with boost speeds reaching 2340 MHz and a robust 14+2 phase VRM to ensure stability under heavy loads. Its primary strengths include an advanced triple-fan cooling system (using two 100mm and one 90mm fan) that operates silently at low temperatures, a dual BIOS for switching between performance and quiet modes, and a reinforced metal backplate with customizable RGB lighting. However, common drawbacks include its massive triple-slot physical footprint (320mm length), a high power requirement necessitating three 8-pin PCIe connectors, and ray-tracing performance that generally lags behind competing NVIDIA flagships.

Compare PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found