Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£780VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super
8.7/10

Overall score

Score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 76% of graphics cards
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

â–²Better than 88%
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 75%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 81%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

5.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.7
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.7

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

8.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
21,000 points
This graphics card scores 21,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
15,711 points
This graphics card scores 15,711 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 75.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,832 points
This graphics card scores 31,832 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 77.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
34,597 points
This graphics card scores 34,597 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 98.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
44.1 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 44.1 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 73.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 66.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
305x 138x 65 mm
This graphics card measures 305x138x 65 mm, which is larger than 73.5% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Length
305 mm
This graphics card is 305 mm long, which is longer than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
138 mm
This graphics card is 138 mm tall, which is taller than 76.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.25 slot/s, which is wider than 89.6% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,315 g
This graphics card weighs 1,315 g, which is heavier than 66.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 11.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super
    the average graphics card
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.90 vs 8.000).
    8.9 vs 8
  • 11.2% better value for money
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super has better value for money than the average graphics card (8 vs 7.2).
    8 vs 7.2
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 53.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 95.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    264 vs 184
  • 120 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    264 vs 144
  • 40.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31832 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,832 points vs 22,653 points
  • 71.4% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (15711 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    15,711 points vs 9,166 points
  • 9.94x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 2.87x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (34597 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    34,597 points vs 12,074 points
  • 11.88x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 43.1% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (21000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    21,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 2.92x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.33x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (76300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    76,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 0.75 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.25 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 20 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    305 mm vs 285 mm
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • 47.2% more expensive
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is more expensive than the average graphics card (£780 vs £530).
    £780 vs £530
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.75 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.25 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 20 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    305 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tech-critter.com
10/12/2024
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
23/01/2024
Summary of the review
M
mmorpg.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
02/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
23/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

  • Exceptional thermal management, often staying below 65°C under heavy gaming loads.
  • Very quiet operation with a well-tuned fan curve and a 'Quiet BIOS' mode.
  • Premium build quality featuring a rugged metal shroud and solid construction.
  • Excellent 1440p performance with capabilities for 4K gaming using DLSS.
  • Includes helpful accessories like a combined GPU support bracket and screwdriver.
  • Efficient power-to-performance ratio compared to previous generation cards.
  • Generous 16GB of VRAM provides better future-proofing for demanding textures.

What we don't like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

  • Large physical footprint (3.25-slot design) that may not fit in smaller cases.
  • Significant weight requires the use of the included anti-sag bracket to prevent PCIe slot damage.
  • High price point that occasionally sits close to the more powerful RTX 4080 Super.
  • Limited and relatively subtle RGB lighting may disappoint users seeking a flashier aesthetic.
  • Occasional reports of coil whine at very high framerates in certain units.
  • Lacks the latest DisplayPort 2.1 standard, sticking with DisplayPort 1.4a.

Verdict

The ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. It offers a boost clock of up to 2640 MHz (2670 MHz in OC mode) and supports advanced technologies like DLSS 3.5 and 3rd-Gen Ray Tracing. Main pros include its exceptionally durable military-grade construction, a large 3.25-slot triple-fan cooler that ensures low temperatures and quiet operation, and dual BIOS support. However, its massive physical size may not fit in compact cases, and it provides only a modest performance uplift over the original 4070 Ti in certain scenarios.

Compare ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found