OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£920VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):115 W

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

40%

6.3

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.3

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 69% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 86%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

44%

4.8

Performance

24%

5.4

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 65%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000-laptop
nvidia-rtx-a4000-laptop
Where to buy
    N/A~ £920
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop

Based on 124 owners sharing their experience in online comments

55%positive26%mixed19%negative

Owners like its efficient speed and generous memory, though heat remains a recurring frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Runs hot in open-air frames or weak cases, with memory often reaching 80–100°C. Strong case airflow or an aftermarket cooler keeps temperatures manageable.27
  • Some owners find that MSI Afterburner sliders reset to zero or refuse profile changes, so overclocking does not take effect.4
  • Overclocking in HiveOS or with certain driver versions can crash the system, making higher hashrates hard to keep stable.4
  • Memory temperatures can reach 90–100°C, even when the core runs cooler. Owners add thermal pads or aftermarket coolers to lower them.4
  • The single 6-pin connector caps power at about 140 W, which drops core clocks under sustained load even when temperatures are fine.3
  • Heavy 3D modelling, PCB assemblies and video editing can slow down noticeably, with the card struggling to keep up.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

44%

4.8

Performance

24%

5.4

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity

6.3
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,668 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 9,668 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,800 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 8,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,782 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 14,782 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 75.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,271 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 6,271 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 78% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
17.8 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 17.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 59.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
12,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 12,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
115 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 115 W, which is lower than that of 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
115 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 115 W under peak load, which is lower than 87.4% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
115 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 115 W, which is lower than that of 87.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
140 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
?
Height
?
Slot width
?
Weight
?
Show more

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 47.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 4.85x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (143 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    143 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 4.32x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 4.85x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (143 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    143 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 4.32x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (Unlimited vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    Unlimited vs 8
  • 3.33x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 47.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 47.7% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 59.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (780 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    780 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 36.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 19.2% lower sentiment score
    6.3 vs 7.8
  • 13.4% worse value for money
    NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.54 vs 7.4).
    6.54 vs 7.41
  • 76.9% more expensive
    NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop is more expensive than the average graphics card (£920 vs £520).
    £920 vs £520
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 59.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (780 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    780 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (268.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    268.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 34.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14,782 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    14,782 points vs 22,638 points
  • 34.6% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9,668 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    9,668 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    April 2021
    2021 vs 2023
  • 21.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (17.8 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    17.8 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 16.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (134.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    134.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 48% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6,271 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    6,271 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 36.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 14.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 14.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • 33.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    392 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 62.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 16 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (83 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    83 °C vs 67 °C
  • 28 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (28 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    28 dB vs 0 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

notebookcheck.com
02/07/2023
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop

  • High efficiency with excellent performance-per-watt
  • Large 16GB VRAM buffer with ECC support, ideal for complex 3D scenes and textures
  • Certified workstation drivers prioritize long-term stability and reliability for professional applications
  • Capable of handling demanding professional tasks like CAD, 3D rendering, and AI inference
  • Supports professional multi-display technologies like Nvidia Mosaic and Quadro Sync II
  • Compact power-efficient design allows for high-density multi-GPU workstation configurations

What customers don't like about NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop

  • Performance is generally lower than its consumer-grade counterpart (RTX 3070 Laptop) at the same power levels
  • Can run significantly hot during intensive tasks like 4K video rendering due to compact thermal designs
  • Cooling fans often become loud under heavy workloads or even at idle if thermal paste degrades
  • Poor price-to-performance ratio for gaming compared to the GeForce RTX series
  • Maximum performance is highly dependent on the laptop OEM's specific power (TGP) implementation
  • Lower GPU clock speeds and memory bandwidth compared to desktop versions or high-end consumer cards

Verdict

The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop GPU is a high-performance professional mobile workstation graphics card based on the Ampere GA104 architecture. It features 5,120 CUDA cores, 160 Tensor cores, 40 second-generation RT cores, and a 256-bit memory interface supporting 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Key pros include professional-grade stability with ISV certifications, low power consumption (80-125W TGP), and hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing and AI tasks comparable to the RTX 3070 laptop series. However, main cons include a lower shader count and significantly less VRAM (8 GB) compared to its 16 GB desktop counterpart, as well as performance that depends heavily on the specific laptop's thermal cooling solution and power limits.

Compare NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Laptop and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found