Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,180VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):100 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

6.0

Technical score

25%

6.0

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

9.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 74% of graphics cards
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

4.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 98%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.5

Performance

24%

4.6

Memory

12%

9.2

Power

11%

9.8

Features

5%

7.6

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 72%
6.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

6.0

Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.1

Average grade

20%

7.4

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 83%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

Based on 1 · 3

Reviewers find gaming performance solid, but most feel the video memory is too limited.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

Based on 233 owners sharing their experience in online comments

82%positive6%mixed12%negative

Owners praise strong gaming speed and DLSS frame generation, while limited video memory is their main concern.

What owners dislike

  • Owners find 12 GB of VRAM tight in some open-world or texture-heavy games, where usage reaches 13 to 16 GB at 1440p. Lowering textures helps.5
  • Frame generation can add noticeable input lag, around 30 to 35 ms latency versus 15 to 20 ms without it, and cause ghosting in racing or driving.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.5

Performance

24%

4.6

Memory

12%

9.2

Power

11%

9.8

Features

5%

7.6

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity

6.0
Reviews score
6.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

4.3

Price

6.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
14,000 points
This graphics card scores 14,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
13,800 points
This graphics card scores 13,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
19,987 points
This graphics card scores 19,987 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 60.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,543 points
This graphics card scores 7,543 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 73.3% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
23.22 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 51.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
25,400 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 25,400 MHz, which is faster than that of 78.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 22.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
?
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 77.8% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
100 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 100 W, which is lower than that of 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
115 W
This graphics card draws 115 W under peak load, which is lower than 87.4% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
115 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 115 W, which is lower than that of 87.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
75 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
?
Height
?
Slot width
?
Weight
?
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 53.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (100 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    100 W vs 215 W
  • 33.7% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (25,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    25,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card uses a smaller manufacturing process than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 47.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 23.1% higher sentiment score
    9.6 vs 7.8
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 22.49x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (798 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    798 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 50.9% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (13,800 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    13,800 points vs 9,148 points
  • 3.3x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (798 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    798 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 33.7% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (25,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    25,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card uses a smaller manufacturing process than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • 53.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (100 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    100 W vs 215 W
  • 47.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 47.7% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    115 W vs 220 W
  • 43.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,425 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,425 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 25.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,425 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,425 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 16.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.0

    Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.1

    Average grade

    20%

    7.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.0 vs 7.2
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.0

    Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.1

    Average grade

    20%

    7.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.0 vs 7.2
  • 23.2% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.02 vs 7.4).
    6.02 vs 7.41
  • 2.27x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,180 vs £520).
    £1,180 vs £520
  • 43.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,425 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,425 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,425 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,425 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 25% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    121 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 23.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (288 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    288 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 4 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    36 vs 40
  • 11.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (19,987 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    19,987 points vs 22,638 points
  • 37.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7,543 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    7,543 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • 14.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
Hubwood
≈ estimated
20/11/2025
Benchmark comparison of 12 games at 1440p
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop is only about 17% faster than the 5060, so the 5060 or a 5070 Ti is the better buy.
6.0
Jarrod'sTech
≈ estimated
22/10/2025
Comparison review with 25 game benchmarks and battery tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop is faster than the 5060 but often overpriced, and 8 GB of VRAM limits its future use.
7.0
Jarrod'sTech
≈ estimated
05/09/2025
Hands-on comparison of 25 games at 1440p and 1080p
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop is only slightly faster than the 4070, so the 4070 is still worth buying when it's on sale.
Not graded
Not graded
Brand video
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

4.0
gamestar.de
≈ estimated
04/03/2026
Laptop test · Power limit tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop offers little over the RTX 5060 and loses a lot of speed at low power, so the RTX 5070 Ti is the better gaming pick.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

  • Impressive performance in 1440p gaming and creative AI workloads
  • Support for DLSS 4 and Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) significantly boosts frame rates
  • High power efficiency compared to previous generation laptop GPUs
  • Major upgrade for users moving from older RTX 20 or 30-series laptops
  • Quiet operation and low temperatures reported in several laptop chassis

What customers don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

  • 8GB to 12GB VRAM capacity is considered restrictive for high-resolution 4K textures
  • Minimal generational performance uplift over the RTX 4070 Laptop without using DLSS
  • Maximum performance is highly dependent on individual laptop cooling and TDP configurations
  • Strong competition from newer AMD Radeon mobile GPUs offering more memory
  • Often carries a significant price premium in newer laptop models

Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, based on the Blackwell architecture (GB206 chip), features 4,608 CUDA cores and 8GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, though some 2026 models reportedly include a 12GB variant. It boasts a configurable TGP ranging from 50W to 125W and introduces DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation for significantly enhanced frame rates and 798 AI TOPS for advanced generative tasks. Main pros include a roughly 15-20% performance uplift over its predecessor, superior power efficiency, and cutting-edge ray reconstruction features. However, the limited 8GB VRAM on most standard models is a significant con that can lead to performance bottlenecks in demanding 1440p gaming or high-resolution creative workflows.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found