OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,200VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master
9.1/10

Overall score

Score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

90%

9.2

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 88% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

â–²Better than 70%
9.2

Technical score

Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.0

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

4.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 93%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 83%
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-4080-super-master
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master

Technical score
Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.0

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

4.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

9.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master has a popularity score of 6 points, which is higher than that of 59% of products in this category.
6.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
26,500 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 26,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 79.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
18,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 18,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 80% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
34,235 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 34,235 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 83.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
34,237 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 34,237 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 97.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
53.76 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 53.76 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 86.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
736.3 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 78.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 320 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.3% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
Size
357x 163x 75 mm
This graphics card measures 357x163x 75 mm, which is larger than 99.7% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Length
357 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 357 mm long, which is longer than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
163 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 163 mm tall, which is taller than 99.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,436 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 2,436 g, which is heavier than 96.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 80.1% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (294 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    294 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 80.1% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (294 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    294 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.38x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (53.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    53.76 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 51.1% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (34235 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    34,235 points vs 22,653 points
  • 80.5% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (26500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    26,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 96.4% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (18000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    18,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 11.77x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (417.8 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    417.76 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 2.84x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (34237 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    34,237 points vs 12,074 points
  • 3.45x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 2.34x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (53.8 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    53.76 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 21.1% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (23000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    23,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 72 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (357 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    357 mm vs 285 mm
  • 38 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (163 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    163 mm vs 125 mm
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.26x more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,200 vs £530).
    £1,200 vs £530
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2.26x more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,200 vs £530).
    £1,200 vs £530
  • 0.5% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.96 vs 8.000).
    7.96 vs 8
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 75% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (21 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    21 W vs 12 W
  • 45.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (320 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    320 W vs 220 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 38 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (163 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    163 mm vs 125 mm
  • 72 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (357 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    357 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.39x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2436 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,436 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwarezone.com.sg
04/03/2024
Summary of the review
Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master review HardwareZone
O
overclock3d.net
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 4080 Super Five Card Review - Gigabyte RTX 4080 Super Aorus Master
H
hwcooling.net
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
Aorus RTX 4080 Super Master 16G: A problem for the RX 7900 XTX review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master

  • Superior 4K gaming performance with high frame rates often exceeding 100fps
  • Exceptional thermal management, running significantly cooler than reference models
  • Highly attractive aesthetic featuring a customizable 2-inch LCD Edge screen and ARGB lighting
  • Very quiet operation under load with low reported instances of coil whine
  • Features a robust dual-BIOS system with dedicated 'Silent' and 'OC' modes
  • Significant price reduction compared to the original non-Super RTX 4080 launch
  • Includes a high-quality anti-sag bracket to support its substantial weight
  • Strong support for DLSS 3.5, ray tracing, and AI-accelerated workloads

What we don't like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master

  • Gigantic physical dimensions (nearly 4 slots thick and 357mm long) that require a very large case
  • Performance uplift over the original RTX 4080 is marginal (often only 1-3%)
  • Premium pricing compared to the MSRP of standard RTX 4080 Super models
  • High power requirements, with recommendations starting at an 850W power supply
  • LCD screen visibility is limited if the card is mounted vertically
  • Software control via Use code with caution.jsonGigabyte Control CenterUse code with caution.json can occasionally be inconsistent

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master is a premium graphics card featuring 10,240 CUDA cores and 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2625 MHz. It is equipped with the massive WINDFORCE cooling system—incorporating three 110mm bionic shark fans and a large vapor chamber—as well as a customizable LCD Edge View screen for real-time monitoring or GIFs. Main pros include exceptional thermal performance that keeps the GPU under 60°C under load, a robust 4-year warranty upon registration, and extensive RGB lighting for enthusiasts. However, its massive quad-slot design (357mm length) makes it a difficult fit for many standard cases, and it lacks the latest DisplayPort 2.1 standard found in some competitors.

Compare GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 Super Master and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found