Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,200VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.2

Technical score

10%

6.8

User score

▲Better than 83% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

▲Better than 64%
9.2

Technical score

Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.1

Memory

12%

7.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 93%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 97%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super

Technical score
Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.1

Memory

12%

7.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

9.2
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super has a popularity score of 4 points, which is lower than that of 50.5% of products in this category.
4.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

4.2

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
26,000 points
This graphics card scores 26,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
18,500 points
This graphics card scores 18,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 81.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
34,224 points
This graphics card scores 34,224 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,684 points
This graphics card scores 19,684 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
52.22 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 52.22 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 84.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
736.3 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 78.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
This graphics card draws 320 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.3% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
Size
304x 137x 61 mm
Length
304 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
61 mm
This graphics card is 61 mm tall, which is shorter than 94.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,115 g
This graphics card weighs 2,115 g, which is heavier than 92.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.31x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (52.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    52.22 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    816 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2.31x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (52.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    52.22 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 75% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (285.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    285.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,550 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.02x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (18500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    18,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 51.1% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (34224 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    34,224 points vs 22,653 points
  • 77.1% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (26000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    26,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 11.77x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (418 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    418 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 3.45x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    836 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 2.27x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (52.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    52.22 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 64.4% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    736.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 21.1% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (23000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    23,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 64 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (61 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    61 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 2.26x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,200 vs £530).
    £1,200 vs £530
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2.26x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,200 vs £530).
    £1,200 vs £530
  • 17.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super has a lower user score than the average graphics card (6.79 vs 8.000).
    6.79 vs 8
  • 17.8% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1438 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,438 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 45.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (320 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    320 W vs 220 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2.07x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2115 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,115 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
reviews.org
03/03/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
geekawhat.com
05/09/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
16/02/2024
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
01/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
03/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
01/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
30/10/2024
Summary of the review
C
cgdirector.com
12/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super

  • Significantly lower MSRP ($999) compared to the original RTX 4080 launch price.
  • Elite 4K gaming performance, often exceeding 100 fps in modern titles.
  • Superior ray-tracing and upscaling capabilities (DLSS 3.5, Frame Generation) compared to AMD rivals.
  • Excellent power efficiency and thermal performance, particularly with the all-black Founders Edition.
  • Strong performance in creative and AI workloads due to dual AV1 encoders and Tensor cores.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super

  • Minimal performance gains (approx. 1–3%) over the non-Super RTX 4080.
  • High absolute price point ($999) still makes it a major investment for most gamers.
  • Lacks new features or architectural changes compared to the original 40-series launch.
  • Large physical dimensions can make it difficult to fit in smaller PC chassis.
  • Overclocked versions of the older RTX 4080 can sometimes outperform the stock Super model.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super is a high-end enthusiast graphics card built on the 5nm Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 10,240 CUDA cores, 80 Ray Tracing cores, and 320 Tensor cores. It is equipped with 16GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 256-bit interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 736 GB/s and a boost clock speed of up to 2.55 GHz. Its main pros include superior 4K gaming performance, advanced DLSS 3.5 support for frame generation and ray reconstruction, and a more competitive $999 launch MSRP compared to the original model. However, notable cons include its massive triple-slot physical size requiring a large case and the very minor performance gains of approximately 1-3% over the non-Super version.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found