Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£520VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–²Better than 63% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

â–²Better than 80%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.3

Performance

24%

7.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 65%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 89%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.3

Performance

24%

7.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity & Media

7.9
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a popularity score of 5.4 points, which is higher than that of 55.4% of products in this category.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
22,000 points
This graphics card scores 22,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 70.6% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,800 points
This graphics card scores 14,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 71% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,811 points
This graphics card scores 28,811 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 67.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
28,931 points
This graphics card scores 28,931 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 92.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
30.9 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 30.9 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 60.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 67.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
245x 115x 40 mm
Length
245 mm
This graphics card is 245 mm long, which is shorter than 71.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,100 g
This graphics card weighs 1,100 g, which is heavier than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 8.7% better value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.83 vs 7.2).
    7.83 vs 7.2
  • 12.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2160 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,160 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 23.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (201 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    201 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 26.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (482.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    482.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 36.9% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (30.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    30.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 49.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (22000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    22,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 61.5% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14800 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,800 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28931 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,931 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4.08x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 27.2% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28811 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    28,811 points vs 22,653 points
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 10 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    85 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 40 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (245 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    245 mm vs 285 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 4.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.64 vs 8.000).
    7.64 vs 8
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 4.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.64 vs 8.000).
    7.64 vs 8
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lanoc.org
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
S
storagereview.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
B
babeltechreviews.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
13/03/2025
Summary of the review
P
pugetsystems.com
06/03/2025
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
27/10/2025
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
06/03/2025
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
07/03/2025
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
04/03/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
29/08/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, maintaining high frame rates in modern AAA titles at max settings.
  • DLSS 4 with Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) significantly improves visual smoothness in supported games.
  • Founders Edition features a compact, sleek two-slot design ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds.
  • Strong performance in creative and AI-based workloads such as Blender and video editing.
  • Competitive entry price point at $549 MSRP, which is $50 lower than the RTX 4070 Super's launch price.
  • Support for modern standards including DisplayPort 2.1a and HDMI 2.1b.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

  • Negligible raw performance gains over the last-gen RTX 4070 Super, often performing within 1-5% of it.
  • 12GB of VRAM is considered insufficient and 'stingy' for a mid-range card released in 2025.
  • Increased power consumption (250W TGP) compared to its predecessors without a proportional performance boost.
  • Limited 4K gaming viability due to the 192-bit memory bus and modest VRAM capacity.
  • Founders Edition cooling solution can run hotter and louder than some third-party board partner models.
  • Stiff competition from AMD's Radeon RX 9070 series, which offers more VRAM at a similar price point.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070, launched in March 2025, is built on the 5nm Blackwell architecture and features the GB205-300 GPU with 6,144 CUDA cores, 48 Ray Tracing cores, and a boost clock of 2,512 MHz. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering a high bandwidth of 672 GB/s, while its total board power is rated at 250W. Main pros include access to the latest DLSS 4.5 frame generation technology, exceptional 1440p gaming performance with improved ray tracing efficiency, and support for modern connectivity like DisplayPort 2.1b. However, primary cons involve its limited 12 GB VRAM capacity for a next-gen mid-range card, modest performance gains over the RTX 4070 Super, and an increased power draw compared to its immediate predecessor.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found