OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£520VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components

90%

7.8

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▲Better than 63% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

▲Better than 80%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

7.3

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 63%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 61%
  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components:

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

7.3

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

7.8
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Popularity:
Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 has a popularity score of 5.9 points, which is higher than that of 58.3% of products in this category.
5.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,543 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 20,543 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 67.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,100 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 14,100 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,165 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 28,165 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
28,931 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 28,931 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 92.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
30.86 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 30.86 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 59.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 67.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
275 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 275 W, which is higher than that of 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
291.9x 116.6x 41.3 mm
This graphics card measures 291.9x116.6x 41.3 mm, which is more compact than 72.1% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
291.9 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 291.9 mm long, which is longer than 52.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
116.6 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 116.6 mm tall, which is shorter than 69.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,130 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,130 g, which is heavier than 56.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 21.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2325 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,325 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 8.5% better value for money
    Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.81 vs 7.2).
    7.81 vs 7.2
  • 21.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2325 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,325 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 23.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (201 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    201 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 26.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (482.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    482.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 36.8% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (30.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    30.87 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28931 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,931 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4.08x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 40% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20543 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    20,543 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 53.8% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14100 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,100 points vs 9,166 points
  • 24.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28165 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    28,165 points vs 22,653 points
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 10 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    85 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (291.9x116.6 x 41.3 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    291.9x116.6 x 41.3 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 8.4 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116.6 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    116.6 mm vs 125 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 83.3% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (22 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    22 W vs 12 W
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 22.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (275 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    275 W vs 225 W
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 83.3% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (22 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    22 W vs 12 W
  • 22.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (275 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    275 W vs 225 W
  • 5 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (42 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    42 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance with support for DLSS 4 and Multi-Frame Generation
  • Highly energy-efficient with a relatively low 250W TDP and 0dB silent fan technology
  • Competitive value for money, often priced closer to NVIDIA's baseline MSRP than other partner cards
  • Compact two-slot design that is SFF-ready and lightweight, reducing the need for support brackets
  • Runs relatively cool and quiet during standard gaming sessions, typically staying between 60°C and 74°C

What we don't like about Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3

  • Build quality feels somewhat 'cheap' due to heavy use of plastic for the backplate and shroud
  • Marginal 'raw' performance gains over the previous generation RTX 4070 Super in non-DLSS tasks
  • 12GB of VRAM is seen as a potential bottleneck for future-proofing at 4K resolution with high settings
  • Occasional reports of coil whine or buzzing fan noises at specific RPM ranges
  • Stock fan curve can be inconsistent, leading to rapid speed changes rather than smooth transitions

Verdict

The Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 is a compact, SFF-ready graphics card built on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 6,144 CUDA cores and 12GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit interface. It operates with a base clock of 2,325 MHz and a boost clock of 2,512 MHz, delivering a significant memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s while supporting advanced technologies like DLSS 4 and 4th-Gen Ray Tracing. Main pros include its space-saving 292mm triple-fan design, excellent thermal efficiency via composite heat pipes, and PCIe 5.0 compatibility for future-proofing. However, notable cons include its relatively limited 12GB VRAM capacity for a next-gen card and a higher 250W TDP compared to its predecessor.

Compare Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Palit GeForce RTX 5070 Infinity 3 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found