Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£4,350VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):575 W

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 87% of graphics cards
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

▼Worse than 78%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.5

Memory

12%

5.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.8

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 85%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.5

Memory

12%

5.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.8

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
50,574 points
This graphics card scores 50,574 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 99.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
38,424 points
This graphics card scores 38,424 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 99.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
38,956 points
This graphics card scores 38,956 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 96.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
24,632 points
This graphics card scores 24,632 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 86.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
112.38 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 112.38 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 98.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,790 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,790 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
575 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 575 W, which is higher than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
600 W
This graphics card draws 600 W under peak load, which is higher than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
This graphics card recommends a 1,000 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
600 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 600 W, which is higher than that of 98% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
600 W
Show more
Size
280x 148x 51 mm
Length
280 mm
This graphics card is 280 mm long, which is shorter than 52.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
148 mm
This graphics card is 148 mm tall, which is taller than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,969 g
This graphics card weighs 2,969 g, which is heavier than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4.43x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1688 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,688 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4.43x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1688 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,688 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 2.68x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (436.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    436.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.82x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (108.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    108.72 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 3.45x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (50574 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    50,574 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 4.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (38424 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    38,424 points vs 9,166 points
  • 72% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (38956 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    38,956 points vs 22,653 points
  • 3.65x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.75 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 7.13x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (1725 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    1,725 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 17,408 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (21,760 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    21,760 vs 4,352
  • 5.9x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4.89x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (112.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    112.38 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 5.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2017 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,017 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.79x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (112.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    112.55 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2.04x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (24632 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    24,632 points vs 12,074 points
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    96 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 4.03x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Uses hybrid cooling
    This graphics card uses hybrid cooling, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 23 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (148 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    148 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 8.21x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£4,350 vs £530).
    £4,350 vs £530
  • 4.22x less popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 8.21x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£4,350 vs £530).
    £4,350 vs £530
  • 4.22x less popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 8.6% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.63 vs 7.2).
    6.63 vs 7.2
  • 0.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2482 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,482 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.54x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (750 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    750 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • 2.73x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (600 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    600 W vs 220 W
  • 2.63x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (31.5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    31.5 W vs 12 W
  • 24 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (24 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    24 dB vs 0 dB
  • 23 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (148 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    148 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.91x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2969 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,969 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
igorslab.de
11/08/2025
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
27/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
06/02/2025
Summary of the review
A
alktech.co
05/02/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
E
eurogamer.net
13/04/2025
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
11/02/2025
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
28/01/2025
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
01/02/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC

  • Superior thermal performance with the 360mm radiator, often keeping temperatures under 55°C even under sustained load
  • Whisper-quiet operation, specifically noted as quieter than the Founders Edition and other air-cooled variants
  • Top-tier performance gains over reference models, especially when utilizing the factory 'super overclock'
  • More compact card dimensions compared to air-cooled 5090s, occupying fewer PCIe slots and reducing weight-induced sag
  • High-end build quality with a premium brushed aluminum design and aesthetic LED lighting
  • Massive 32GB GDDR7 frame buffer and support for DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC

  • Extremely high price point, often retailing at a significant premium ($500+) over the reference MSRP
  • Requires a PC case with specific support for a large 360mm radiator, which may limit compatibility with smaller builds
  • Significant coil whine detected by some reviewers during high gaming workloads
  • Complex installation process compared to standard air-cooled cards due to the radiator and hose management
  • Limited availability and stock issues, with prices often inflated by scalpers
  • High total power draw, frequently exceeding 600W in gaming mode, necessitating a powerful 1000W+ PSU

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC is a flagship graphics card powered by the Blackwell architecture, featuring 21,760 CUDA cores and 32GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus for a massive 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. This overclocked model achieves a boost clock of 2,482 MHz and utilizes a premium 360mm hybrid AIO cooling system with StormForce fans to manage its high 575W power draw while maintaining a compact 2-slot width and 280mm card length. Key advantages include industry-leading 4K thermal performance, exceptionally quiet operation under load, and a sleek brushed-metal design with refined RGB lighting. However, major drawbacks include its extremely high price point, the need for a large case to accommodate the 360mm radiator, and potential long-term concerns regarding liquid pump longevity or coil whine.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Liquid OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found