OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£580VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):180 W

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

40%

7.3

Technical score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.3

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 58% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

â–²Better than 62%
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

44%

6.3

Performance

24%

6.7

Memory

12%

9.3

Power

11%

9.8

Features

5%

7.4

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

â–²Better than 56%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
  • msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
msi-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-gaming-trio-oc-16gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £580
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB

Based on 11 · 2

Near-silent and cool-running with solid build quality, but it's bulky, its power connector draws criticism and rivals often look better.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB

Based on 232 owners sharing their experience in online comments

68%positive6%mixed26%negative

Owners praise smooth gaming and generous memory, while limited VRAM and driver problems frustrate some.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners get black screens or stalled installs after updating Nvidia drivers; a clean DDU reinstall fixed one case.5
  • Some owners say demanding games like Monster Hunter Wilds stay under 60 fps at 1440p without frame generation; a 5070 is faster.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

44%

6.3

Performance

24%

6.7

Memory

12%

9.3

Power

11%

9.8

Features

5%

7.4

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

7.3
Reviews score
8.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
15,321 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 15,321 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 52.6% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,956 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 9,956 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 54.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,683 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,683 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 51.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,317 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 11,317 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 53.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
24.4 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 24.4 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 55.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
28,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 28,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 22.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 77.8% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 84.9% of graphics cards and equal to 14.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
180 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 180 W, which is lower than that of 57.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 47.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 53.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
180 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 180 W, which is lower than that of 61.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
180 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
300x 125x 44 mm
Length
300 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 300 mm long, which is longer than 57.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Height
125 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 125 mm tall, which is shorter than 48.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
844 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 844 g, which is lighter than 67.5% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 5.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,647 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,647 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25.4% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,407 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,407 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • 15.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 77% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.2
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 15.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 77% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.2
  • 5.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,647 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,647 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25.4% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,407 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,407 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 3.14x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (759 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    759 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1a).
    2.1b vs 2.1a
  • 3.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 11 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (24.4 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    24.4 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 16.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (180 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    180 W vs 215 W
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 21.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (127.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    127.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 4 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    36 vs 40
  • 14 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (51 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    51 °C vs 37 °C
  • 6.4% lower sentiment score
    7.3 vs 7.8
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 21.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (127.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    127.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 4 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    36 vs 40
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 14 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (51 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    51 °C vs 37 °C
  • 17.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (300 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    300 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
HardwareVsGaming
≈ estimated
17/04/2025
Hands-on review · benchmarks, power and temperatures
Verdict
MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB is solid for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not exciting, especially at current street prices.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
alktech.co
≈ estimated
16/04/2025
Lab test · Slim triple-fan card
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Gaming Trio OC is a slim triple-fan card that averages 53 to 110 fps at 1440p across tested games with upscaling off.
8.8
itc.ua
✓ explicit
13/05/2025
Hands-on test · 4K gaming
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC is quiet and well cooled, with DLSS making 4K playable, though its overclocking is capped.
8.0
wccftech.com
≈ estimated
01/06/2025
Lab test · Triple-fan cooling
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC runs nearly silent and cool, nears RTX 4070 speed in many games, but its gain over the 4060 Ti is modest.
8.0
overclocking.com
≈ estimated
16/04/2025
Benchmark review · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC is a capable 1440p card with strong frame generation gains, but it trails the RTX 5070 by about 24%.
8.0
comptoir-hardware.com
≈ estimated
29/10/2025
Hands-on review · Noise and build
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC has a premium look, solid build and high clocks, but coil whine and an unpleasant fan tone undercut its quiet running.
7.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
16/04/2025
Hands-on review · Quiet triple-fan
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC is nearly silent under load and stays cool, a strong pick for quiet builds, though power use hasn't improved.
9.2
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
12/05/2025
Full review · Quiet 1440p card
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Gaming Trio OC is a quiet card for 1440p at up to 144 Hz, though it's no big step up.
8.8
itc.ua
✓ explicit
13/05/2025
Test review · 1440p and 1080p
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Gaming Trio OC suits 1440p gamers who want quiet cooling and DLSS 4, though its overclocking is capped in software.
8.5
razorman.net
✓ explicit
04/05/2025
Full review · Mid-range gaming
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Gaming Trio OC is a quiet, well-cooled mid-range card for 1440p, best for players who want DLSS 4 and 16 GB of VRAM.
9.6
gameit.es
✓ explicit
08/01/2026
Hands-on review · Quiet cooling
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Gaming Trio OC is a very quiet, sturdy card for gaming and content creation, with a sporty look and RGB lighting.
7.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
31/10/2025
Lab test · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The MSI RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC is a quiet, cool card for 1440p ray tracing, suiting buyers who want Nvidia features and steady temperatures.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB

  • Future-proof 16GB VRAM for modern AAA titles
  • Extremely quiet operation with Tri-Frozr cooling
  • Excellent thermal management (stays consistently cool)
  • Significant performance boost with DLSS 4 and Frame Generation
  • Visually appealing design with customizable RGB lighting
  • High build quality with a sturdy metal backplate
  • Factory overclocked for extra out-of-the-box performance

What customers don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB

  • High price premium over MSRP (often approaching RTX 5070 territory)
  • Narrow 128-bit memory bus can limit 1440p/4K potential
  • Modest generational uplift in pure rasterisation (non-DLSS) performance
  • Large physical footprint (triple-fan design) may not fit smaller cases
  • Performance degradation on older PCIe 3.0 motherboards due to 8-lane interface

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB is a premium mid-range graphics card featuring NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture and 4,608 CUDA cores. It is equipped with a significant 16GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory speed of 28 Gbps and a boost clock speed of up to 2647 MHz (2662 MHz in MSI Center). Main characteristics include the robust TRI FROZR 4 cooling system with three Stormforce fans, a nickel-plated copper baseplate, and a reinforced metal backplate, all within a 300mm triple-fan design. The card's primary pros are its superior 1080p and 1440p performance with DLSS 4 support, generous VRAM for future-proofing, and exceptionally quiet, power-efficient operation at 180W. Main cons include a substantial price premium over the base MSRP and modest raw rasterization gains of roughly 10–15% compared to the previous generation.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Gaming Trio OC 16GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found