Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,140VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):400 W

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.0

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 69% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.1

Performance

24%

7.8

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 69%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 68%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.1

Performance

24%

7.8

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

8.0
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 67.1% of products in this category.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,636 points
This graphics card scores 19,636 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
12,963 points
This graphics card scores 12,963 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 63.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,784 points
This graphics card scores 26,784 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,007 points
This graphics card scores 15,007 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
37.48 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 37.48 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
912 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 912 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
400 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 400 W, which is higher than that of 93.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
400 W
This graphics card draws 400 W under peak load, which is higher than 91.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
430 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 430 W, which is higher than that of 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
400 W
Show more
Size
336x 140x 61 mm
This graphics card measures 336x140x 61 mm, which is larger than 77.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
336 mm
This graphics card is 336 mm long, which is longer than 87.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1905 g
This graphics card weighs 1905 g, which is heavier than 86.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 4.2% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.33 vs 8.000).
    8.33 vs 8
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 53.6% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (585.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    585.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 66.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (37.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    37.48 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 25.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (205 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    205 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 26.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1830 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 86% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (400 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    400 W vs 215 W
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 91.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (430 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    430 W vs 225 W
  • 2.15x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,140 vs £530).
    £1,140 vs £530
  • 26.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1830 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    June 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • 2.13x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    628 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 86% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (400 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    400 W vs 215 W
  • 91.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (430 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    430 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 81.8% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (400 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    400 W vs 220 W
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 41.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (17 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    17 W vs 12 W
  • 7 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (44 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    44 °C vs 37 °C
  • 51 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    336 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 86.6% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1905 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,905 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lowyat.net
20/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
10/06/2021
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
03/06/2021
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
E
extreme.pcgameshardware.de
02/06/2021
Summary of the review
E
elchapuzasinformatico.com
02/06/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X

  • Exceptional build quality with premium materials
  • Top-tier cooling performance with the Tri Frozr 2S system
  • Extremely quiet operation even under heavy gaming loads
  • High factory overclock providing leading performance in its class
  • Dual BIOS feature allowing for 'Silent' or 'Gaming' modes
  • Aesthetic design with customizable RGB lighting

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X

  • High power consumption requiring a robust PSU (850W+ recommended)
  • Massive physical footprint (336mm length) may not fit in smaller cases
  • Significant weight that often requires the included support bracket
  • Premium pricing that puts it close to RTX 3090 territory
  • Generates considerable heat that must be exhausted from the case

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X is a premium enthusiast graphics card built on NVIDIA's 8nm Ampere architecture, featuring 10,240 CUDA cores and 12GB of high-speed GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus. This flagship model is characterized by its significant factory overclock, achieving boost clocks up to 1,845 MHz in Extreme Mode, and its massive Tri Frozr 2S cooling system equipped with triple Torx 4.0 fans and a brushed aluminum shroud. Its main pros include top-tier 4K gaming performance that nearly matches the RTX 3090, exceptional build quality with a dual BIOS (Gaming/Silent) feature, and highly efficient thermal management. However, its significant cons include a massive physical footprint requiring three PCIe slots, a high power draw of 400W necessitating at least an 850W power supply, and a high premium price compared to standard models.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Suprim X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found