OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£760VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

▲Better than 75% of graphics cards
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

▲Better than 88%
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 76%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 83%
  • inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
  • inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
  • inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
inno3d-ichill-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-x3
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 has a popularity score of 3.3 points, which is lower than that of 52.7% of products in this category.
3.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

8.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
24,500 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 24,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
15,865 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 15,865 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 75.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,830 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,830 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 77% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,319 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,319 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 71.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
45.11 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 45.11 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 77.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 67.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 66.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.7% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
285 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 285 W, which is higher than that of 63.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
334x 148x 62 mm
Length
334 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 334 mm long, which is longer than 86.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
148 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 148 mm tall, which is taller than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,660 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,660 g, which is heavier than 80.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 6.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (256.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    256.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 11% better value for money
    INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.99 vs 7.2).
    7.99 vs 7.2
  • 6.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 57% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (256.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    256.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 95.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    264 vs 184
  • 120 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    264 vs 144
  • 66.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (24500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    24,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 40.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31830 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,830 points vs 22,653 points
  • 73.1% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (15865 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    15,865 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.92x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 23 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (148 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    148 mm vs 125 mm
  • 49 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (334 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    334 mm vs 285 mm
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 26.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    285 W vs 225 W
  • 62.6% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1660 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,660 g vs 1,021 g
  • 43.4% more expensive
    INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£760 vs £530).
    £760 vs £530
  • 0.1% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3
    the average graphics card
    INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (8.00 vs 8.000).
    8 vs 8
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 26.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (285 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    285 W vs 225 W
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 23 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (148 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    148 mm vs 125 mm
  • 49 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (334 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    334 mm vs 285 mm
  • 62.6% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1660 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,660 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3

  • Exceptional thermal performance with GPU temperatures often staying below 60°C under load
  • Very quiet operation, featuring a silent 'zero-RPM' mode when idle
  • Premium build quality with a sturdy metal backplate and included GPU support stand to prevent sag
  • Competitive pricing, often positioned as one of the more affordable triple-fan 4070 Ti Super models
  • Attractive aggressive aesthetic with customizable ARGB lighting synchronization
  • Factory overclocked for a slight performance edge over baseline reference models

What we don't like about INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3

  • Lacks a dual-BIOS feature, which is typically expected in flagship-tier aftermarket cards
  • Large physical dimensions (triple-slot thickness and ~334mm length) may not fit in smaller cases
  • Includes a triple 8-pin power adapter despite not needing the extra overhead compared to dual 8-pin setups
  • Some users reported minor coil whine under heavy load, though this varies by individual unit
  • Branding on fans uses simple stickers which can feel less premium than higher-end competitors

Verdict

The Inno3D iChill GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 is a high-performance graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and a significant memory upgrade to 16GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672 GB/s bandwidth. It operates with a base clock of 2,340 MHz and a factory-overclocked boost of 2,670 MHz, making it highly capable for 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming with DLSS 3 support. Main pros include its exceptional iChill triple-fan cooling system that maintains impressively low temperatures (often under 60°C), a robust build with a provided anti-sag stand, and excellent power efficiency relative to its performance class. Main cons include its massive triple-slot dimensions (334mm length) which may not fit in smaller cases, the lack of a dual BIOS feature common in flagship cards, and potential fan noise or coil whine under heavy loads.

Compare INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of INNO3D iCHILL GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super X3 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found