OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,280VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):360 W

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice
9.2/10

Overall score

Score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

90%

9.3

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

★Better than 94% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

3.8

Price

▲Better than 70%
9.3

Technical score

Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 96%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 84%
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-5080-master-ice
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #40 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice

Technical score
Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.3
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice has a popularity score of 6.8 points, which is higher than that of 64.1% of products in this category.
6.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

3.8

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
32,984 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 32,984 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 92.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
26,278 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 26,278 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 95.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
36,247 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 36,247 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 91% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,364 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 19,364 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
60.32 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 60.32 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 92.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
360 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 360 W, which is higher than that of 88.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
360 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 360 W under peak load, which is higher than 85.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
360 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 360 W, which is higher than that of 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
360 W
Show more
Size
360x 150x 75 mm
This graphics card measures 360x150x 75 mm, which is larger than 96.7% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Length
360 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 360 mm long, which is longer than 99% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
150 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 150 mm tall, which is taller than 93.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
4 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 4 slot/s, which is wider than 97.6% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2000 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 2000 g, which is heavier than 88.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 12% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2805 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,805 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.47x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (942.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    942.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 12% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2805 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,805 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.47x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (942.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    942.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 92.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (314.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    314.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 192 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (336 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    336 vs 144
  • 2.49x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.87x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (26278 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    26,278 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.25x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (32984 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    32,984 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 60% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (36247 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    36,247 points vs 22,653 points
  • 6,400 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,752 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,752 vs 4,352
  • 2.62x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (60.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    60.32 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3.1x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (750 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    750 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 1 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    1 vs 0
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (24 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    24 °C vs 37 °C
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 75 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (360 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    360 mm vs 285 mm
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 2.42x more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,280 vs £530).
    £1,280 vs £530
  • 91.6% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (10.7 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    10.7 vs 128
  • 2.42x more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,280 vs £530).
    £1,280 vs £530
  • 0.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.93 vs 8.000).
    7.93 vs 8
  • 91.6% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (10.7 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    10.7 vs 128
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 63.6% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (360 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    360 W vs 220 W
  • 66.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (20 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    20 W vs 12 W
  • 75 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (360 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    360 mm vs 285 mm
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 95.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2000 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,000 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
geeknetic.es
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 MASTER ICE 16G Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice

  • Elite 4K gaming performance with significant gains in ray tracing and DLSS 4.0 support
  • Highly efficient Windforce cooling system that maintains low temperatures (maxing ~65°C) even under load
  • Whisper-quiet operation due to high-quality fluid dynamic bearing fans and intelligent fan-stop tech
  • Extensive customization options including the LCD Edge View screen for GIFs/stats and RGB Halo lighting
  • Premium build quality with a reinforced metal backplate and aerospace-grade PCB coating for durability
  • Excellent overclocking headroom, with some users reaching over 3000MHz stability
  • Extended 4-year warranty provided by Gigabyte upon registration

What we don't like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice

  • Extremely large physical footprint (3.5+ slots, 360mm length) requiring a very spacious case
  • Significant price premium over standard RTX 5080 models for mostly aesthetic and cooling upgrades
  • High power requirements (850W-1000W recommended) with a 360W-400W peak draw
  • Software-related complaints, specifically regarding the out-of-the-box fan curve tuning
  • Potential for minor 'coil whine' in some units, though reported as minimal compared to competitors
  • Early batches had reports of excess thermal gel leakage, though this was largely resolved in later revisions

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice is a high-end enthusiast graphics card built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture, featuring 10,752 CUDA cores, 16GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, and an impressive factory-overclocked boost clock of 2805 MHz. Its core strengths include a premium white 'Ice' aesthetic with customizable RGB Halo lighting, a built-in LCD Edge View screen for real-time monitoring, and a robust Windforce cooling system utilizing a large vapor chamber and 'Hawk' bionic fans for whisper-quiet thermal efficiency. While it excels in 4K gaming and AI-accelerated tasks with DLSS 4 support, its massive 3.5-slot physical footprint (360mm length) requires a spacious case, and its high 360W power draw necessitates at least an 850W power supply.

Compare GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 Master Ice and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found