OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£800VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):355 W

XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air
8.9/10

Overall score

Score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

▲Better than 81% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

★Better than 92%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

44%

9.4

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

5.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 81%
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 69%
  • xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
  • xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
  • xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
  • xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
  • xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
xfx-mercury-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components:

44%

9.4

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

5.2

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Popularity:
XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air has a popularity score of 7.1 points, which is higher than that of 66.5% of products in this category.
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
32,087 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 32,087 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 91.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
16,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 16,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 75.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,355 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,355 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
20,485 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 20,485 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 81.6% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
64.27 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 64.27 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 93.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
13.5 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 13.5 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
355 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 355 W, which is higher than that of 87.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
393 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 393 W under peak load, which is higher than 91.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
355 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 355 W, which is higher than that of 83.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
355 W
Show more
Size
346x 132x 68 mm
Length
346 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 346 mm long, which is longer than 94.5% of graphics cards.
Height
135 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 135 mm tall, which is taller than 69.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,863 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,863 g, which is heavier than 85.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 56 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    96 vs 40
  • 56 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    96 vs 40
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.52x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 200 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (384 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    384 vs 184
  • 3.08x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (502.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    502.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 12.9% better value for money
    XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.12 vs 7.2).
    8.12 vs 7.2
  • 5.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air
    the average graphics card
    XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.43 vs 8.000).
    8.43 vs 8
  • 56 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    96 vs 40
  • 56 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    96 vs 40
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 2.52x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 200 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (384 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    384 vs 184
  • 3.08x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (502.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    502.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2615 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,615 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.72x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (61.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    61.39 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.19x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (32087 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    32,087 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 74.6% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (16000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    16,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 38.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31355 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,355 points vs 22,653 points
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 4.19x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    2.01 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4.33x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (128.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    128.6 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 7,936 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (12,288 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    12,288 vs 4,352
  • 2.8x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (64.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    64.27 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 42.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 26.3% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (24000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    24,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 2.52x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (57700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    57,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 65.1% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (355 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    355 W vs 215 W
  • 61 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (346 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    346 mm vs 285 mm
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 57.8% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (355 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    355 W vs 225 W
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • 50.9% more expensive
    XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air is more expensive than the average graphics card (£800 vs £530).
    £800 vs £530
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • 79.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (529 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    529 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 65.1% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (355 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    355 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 57.8% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (355 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    355 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 78.6% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (393 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    393 W vs 220 W
  • 41.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (17 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    17 W vs 12 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 61 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (346 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    346 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (135 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    135 mm vs 125 mm
  • 82.5% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1863 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,863 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air (Replaceable Fans)
T
techpowerup.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air Review - TechPowerUp
G
guru3d.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air (Replaceable Fans)
I
igorslab.de
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air 24 GB Review
O
overclock3d.net
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Radeon Magnetic Air RX 7800XTGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. and RX 7900XTXGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. TechPowerUp
T
thefpsreview.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
XFX Mercury AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air Video Card Review
P
pausehardware.com
18/06/2024
Summary of the review
[Pause Hardware] XFX Magnetic Air : Une Révolution Pour Les Cartes Graphiques
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air

  • Innovative magnetic fan technology allowing for easy, toolless removal for cleaning or replacement
  • Exceptional cooling performance with low operating temperatures (typically 60-65°C)
  • Extremely quiet operation under most loads, often described as 'virtually inaudible'
  • Premium build quality with a solid metal backplate and sleek, 'muscle car' aesthetic
  • Pre-applied high-performance Honeywell PTM7950 thermal material for better longevity
  • High raw rasterization performance, competing well with the RTX 4080 and occasionally the 4090
  • Includes a support bracket to prevent GPU sag for the large 3.5-slot card

What we don't like about XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air

  • Massive physical size (346mm length) may not fit in all standard computer cases
  • Lags behind NVIDIA competitors in ray tracing performance
  • High power consumption, requiring at least an 850W power supply and three 8-pin connectors
  • Lack of extensive RGB lighting may disappoint some users seeking a more colourful build
  • VRAM temperatures can sometimes run higher than expected under extreme stress
  • Higher price point compared to entry-level 7900 XTX models
  • Some users view the magnetic fan feature as a 'gimmick' with limited practical use if fans don't fail

Verdict

The XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air is a flagship graphics card featuring the Navi 31 GPU with 6,144 stream processors, 24GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, and factory-overclocked speeds up to a 2,615 MHz boost clock. Its defining characteristic is the patented toolless Magnetic Air system, which uses swappable 100mm double ball-bearing fans for effortless maintenance and cleaning, alongside a high-performance vapor chamber and Honeywell PTM7950 thermal material. Main pros include exceptional 4K rasterization performance that rivals high-end competitors, substantial VRAM for future-proofing, and an innovative cooling design that maintains low temperatures even under load. However, the card is physically massive at 3.5 slots wide, has high power demands requiring three 8-pin connectors, and lacks the superior ray tracing and DLSS support found in comparable NVIDIA alternatives.

Compare XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Mercury Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found