OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,010VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

8.3/10

▲Better than 84% of graphics cards

7.3

▼Worse than 62%

8.6

▲Better than 76%

8.3

▲Better than 77%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

9.0
Gaming
Gaming
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures floating-point compute power, dedicated VRAM capacity, ray-tracing hardware, and modern PCIe generation bandwidth.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
25.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.5
Video editing
Video editing
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates hardware AV1 encoding support, generous video memory, raw compute power, and fast interface throughput.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
10
AV1 encode
30.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.0
1080p
1080p
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses pure rasterization power and VRAM balance optimized for consistently high frame rates at 1080p resolution.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
25.0%
10
VRAM
10.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.0
1440p
1440p
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures compute throughput, sufficient VRAM buffer, and ray-tracing performance tailored for sharp 1440p gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
30.0%
10
VRAM
15.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
9.1
4K
4K
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates ultra-high compute capability, heavy VRAM capacities, and advanced ray-tracing cores required for native 4K gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
8.6
FP32 performance
35.0%
10
VRAM
20.0%
8.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

Based on 8 · 1

Excellent cooling, ample memory, handy fan headers and BIOS modes, but it's huge, heavy and demands a hefty power supply.

Praised

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

Based on 209 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive9%mixed13%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming speed and generous memory, while demanding games and unstable tuning expose its main limits.

What owners like

Owners run most games at max settings at 1440p, often above 100 fps, and reach 4K around 70–90 fps with DLSS on.63
Undervolting, often to about 0.975V, lowers load temperatures and hotspot gaps, and many cards then stay in the 50s–60s°C.20
Owners moving from GTX 1080, 2070 or 3060-class cards report a large jump in performance, with many games running at max settings.18
Many cards boost near 2900–2950 MHz out of the box and accept memory overclocks of about +2000 MHz, with some core overclocks near 3000 MHz.11
Undervolting cuts power draw by roughly 50–120 watts while losing only 1–3 fps in many games, sometimes none.10
The 16GB of memory handles ultra settings and ray tracing at 1440p and ultrawide, with owners noting extra headroom over 8GB and 10GB cards.9
DLSS upscaling is praised for near-native image quality, and frame generation can lift frame rates sharply, though owners note some added input lag.9
Owners report benchmark results roughly 5–10% behind an RTX 4080, and overclocking can narrow the gap.7
Owners say ray tracing stays playable, holding around 60 fps at 1440p in demanding titles.3

What owners dislike

Aggressive undervolt or overclock curves can cause crashes, black screens or driver failures, and some owners found the set voltage did not hold.8
Applied curve settings sometimes don't hold: core clocks drop below the target, voltage stays above the set value, and memory clocks reset after applying.4
At 4K or 240Hz settings, owners often need DLSS or frame generation, and path-traced games can drop to around 30–40 fps.3
Some owners' undervolt presets cost noticeable frame rate, around 5–15%, in games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Resident Evil Requiem.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

8.3

Show more

Hide

Performance

8.9

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

FP32 performance

Show more

Memory

8.5

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Effective memory speed

Show more

What reviewers say

Features

9.7

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity

9.6

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power

8.2

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

285 W

Show more

What reviewers say

Design

4.9

Show more

Hide

Size

336x 150x 63 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

What reviewers say

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super vs the average graphics card

Why is ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

7.8% higher boost clock speed
This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
21.9% higher base clock speed
This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
26 more compute units
This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
66 vs 40
4 GB more VRAM
This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
16 GB vs 12 GB
82.3% higher texture rate
This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
26 more ray tracing cores
This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
66 vs 40
64 bit wider memory bus
This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
256 bit vs 192 bit
50% higher memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s

15.3% higher review score
Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
80%
8.3
Average grade
20%
8.5
Popularity
Grades by review (9)
8 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.3 vs 7.2

7.8% higher boost clock speed
This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
2,700 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
21.9% higher base clock speed
This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
26 more compute units
This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
66 vs 40
82.3% higher texture rate
This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
689 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
26 more ray tracing cores
This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
66 vs 40
32 more ROPs
This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
96 vs 64
55.4% higher pixel rate
This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (250.6 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
250.6 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
95.1% higher FP32 performance
This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
44.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
80 more TMUs
This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
264 vs 184
120 more AI cores
This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
264 vs 144
91.5% higher gaming score
This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (28,296 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
28,296 points vs 14,779 points
40.6% higher PassMark score
This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31,825 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
31,825 points vs 22,638 points
66.2% higher ray tracing score
This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (15,200 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
15,200 points vs 9,148 points
9.95x higher BF16 performance
This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
11.97x higher FP16 performance
This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
353 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS

4 GB more VRAM
This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
16 GB vs 12 GB
64 bit wider memory bus
This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
256 bit vs 192 bit
50% higher memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
2x larger L2 cache
This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
48 MB vs 24 MB
12x more Infinity Cache
This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
48 MB vs 4 MB
10.5% faster memory speed
This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz

2x more transistors
This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45,900 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
45,900 million vs 22,900 million

7 °C lower load temperature
This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
60 °C vs 67 °C

Why is ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

Less advanced frame generation
This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
frame generation vs multi frame generation
25 mm higher card profile
This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
150 mm vs 125 mm
53.8 mm longer card length
This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
336 mm vs 282.2 mm
32.6% higher TDP
This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
285 W vs 215 W
0.65 slot/s wider design
This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
66.4% higher board power limit
This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (366 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
366 W vs 220 W
25% slower VRAM clock
This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
15.4% higher PSU requirement
This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
750 W vs 650 W

94.2% more expensive
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,010 vs £520).
£1,010 vs £520

25% slower VRAM clock
This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

Less advanced frame generation
This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
frame generation vs multi frame generation
Older shader model
This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
6.7 vs 6.8
28.9% larger GPU die
This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (379 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
379 mm² vs 294 mm²

More basic codec support
This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
5 vs 6

32.6% higher TDP
This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
285 W vs 215 W
66.4% higher board power limit
This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (366 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
366 W vs 220 W
15.4% higher PSU requirement
This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
750 W vs 650 W
5 °C lower thermal ceiling
This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
100 °C vs 95 °C
40.9% higher peak power draw
This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (310 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
310 W vs 220 W

25 mm higher card profile
This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
150 mm vs 125 mm
53.8 mm longer card length
This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
336 mm vs 282.2 mm
0.65 slot/s wider design
This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
77.5% heavier
This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1,800 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
1,800 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0

TheOverclocker

≈ estimated

24/01/2024

Hands-on review · benchmarks, overclocking and temperatures

Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is a small step up from the 4070 Ti, but it is the better buy at the same price.

Not graded

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0

guru3d.com

≈ estimated

25/01/2024

ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Gaming STRIX OC review

Hands-on review · Quiet cooling

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC is very quiet, with strong ray tracing and DLSS 3, and suits enthusiasts who like to customize their builds.

8.0

techpowerup.com

✓ explicit

24/01/2024

ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Strix OC Review Would you like to see a performance comparison between this Strix model and the more budget-friendly As...

Hands-on review · Custom cooler

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC is a flashy, well-cooled card for 1440p high-refresh gaming, but it is large and heavy.

8.0

pcguide.com

✓ explicit

29/04/2024

Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super review - is it worth it?

Review · Cooling and 4K gaming

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC is a strong 4K card with good cooling and a smart look, but it is hefty and large.

9.0

en.gamegpu.com

≈ estimated

24/01/2024

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER OC Video Card Review

Benchmark review · Dual BIOS modes

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC pairs 16GB memory with a BIOS switch for performance or quiet mode, but it is long.

9.5

charlestech.fr

✓ explicit

25/04/2026

Asus ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super Review: Top-tier Performance

Hands-on review · Cooling and performance

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super is a fast, cool card for 1440p and 4K gaming, but its 2.4 kg weight means it needs a support bracket.

9.6

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

24/01/2024

ASUS ROG Strix NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super OC Review

Hands-on test · Large custom cooler

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC adds 16GB memory and wider bandwidth for 4K gaming, but it is heavy, large and keeps the old look.

9.0

es.gamegpu.com

≈ estimated

24/01/2024

Revisión y prueba de la tarjeta de video Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX

Hands-on review · BIOS modes

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC pairs 16GB memory with a BIOS switch for performance or quiet mode, but it is long.

7.0

hwupgrade.it

≈ estimated

24/01/2024

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER OC review: a SUPER that is not so super

Lab test · Modest upgrade gains

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti Super OC has 16GB memory for 4K, but gains over the RTX 4070 Ti are modest and the card is very large.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

Superior cooling performance, often described as 'chart-topping' or the strongest among tested 4070 Ti Super models
Whisper-quiet operation, with dedicated quiet modes and highly optimized fan curves
High build quality featuring robust materials like a diecast frame and premium finishes
Stunning aesthetics with extensive, customisable ARGB lighting
Excellent performance for 1440p and competitive 4K gaming, outperforming the previous 3090 Ti flagship
Added features like dual HDMI 2.1 ports and multiple fan headers for case airflow control

What customers don't like about ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

High price premium, with several users noting it can be significantly more expensive than the NVIDIA MSRP
Large physical footprint that may cause fitment issues in smaller or ultra-compact PC cases
Diminishing value proposition as the price point can approach that of the higher-tier RTX 4080 Super
High power consumption compared to some alternatives, with a recommended 750W+ power supply

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores and a significant upgrade to 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. This OC Edition boasts a factory-overclocked boost clock of up to 2,700 MHz in OC mode and utilizes a massive 3.15-slot cooling system with three Axial-tech fans to ensure chart-topping thermal performance and near-silent operation. Its main pros include exceptional 4K gaming capabilities, robust build quality with a die-cast shroud, and premium features like dual BIOS and FanConnect II headers for integrated system cooling. However, its primary cons are its premium price point, which sits well above the base MSRP, and its substantial physical dimensions and weight (1.8kg), which require a large case and often necessitate the use of an anti-sag bracket.

Best alternatives

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity

Graphics cards

ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4080 Super

Graphics cards

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super OC Edition

Graphics cards

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4080 Super X3 OC

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Master

Graphics cards

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Super

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 Super WINDFORCE

Graphics cards

INNO3D GeForce RTX 4080 Super X3

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Super Gaming X Slim

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 Super AERO OC

Graphics cards

PNY GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Verto OC Triple Fan

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found