OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£940VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):285 W

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

40%

7.8

Technical score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

10

Sentiment score

▲Better than 77% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

▼Worse than 54%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.1

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

4.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

▲Better than 65%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (8)
5 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-rog-strix-geforce-rtx-4070-ti
asus-rog-strix-geforce-rtx-4070-ti
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Based on 5 · 3

Reviewers love its RGB lighting, quiet running and strong performance, but find it big, heavy, awkward to power and expensive.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Based on 214 owners sharing their experience in online comments

83%positive9%mixed8%negative

Owners praise its fast, efficient gaming, while limited memory can constrain demanding 4K play.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners get lower-than-expected frame rates, with results depending on the CPU, settings and whether DLSS is on; one reported GPU use stuck at 0%.12
  • At 4K with ray tracing and frame generation, the 12 GB VRAM fills, causing frame drops after leaving menus in games like Alan Wake 2.8
  • Some owners report freezes during intense scenes, forced game closes, full PC shutdowns, and brief black screens with lasting performance drops.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components:

44%

8.3

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.1

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

4.9

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.8
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

5.6

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,000 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 20,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 14,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 66.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,581 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,581 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 76.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,203 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,203 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 70.4% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
40.09 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 72.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 54.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
21,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 21,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 61.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
285 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 285 W, which is higher than that of 67.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 65.6% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
350 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 350 W, which is higher than that of 82.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
336x 150x 63 mm
Length
336 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 336 mm long, which is longer than 88.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Height
150 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 150 mm tall, which is taller than 93.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.15 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.15 slot/s, which is wider than 89.2% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,800 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,800 g, which is heavier than 83.7% of Graphics cards and equal to 1.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 9% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 65.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 92% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    5 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 92% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    5 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 9% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    60 vs 40
  • 65.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    626.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 20 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (60 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    60 vs 40
  • 77.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (40.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    40.09 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 56 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (240 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    240 vs 184
  • 29.4% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (208.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    208.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 39.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31,581 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    31,581 points vs 22,638 points
  • 9.95x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 53% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14,000 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    14,000 points vs 9,148 points
  • 35.3% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    20,000 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 53.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    336 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 0.65 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 59.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 80.8% more expensive
    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more expensive than the average graphics card (£940 vs £520).
    £940 vs £520
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 32.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (285 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    285 W vs 215 W
  • 59.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 53.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    336 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.65 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.15 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 77.5% heavier
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1,800 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    1,800 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechnoReviews
≈ estimated
22/01/2024
Benchmark review · temperatures, noise, software and game tests
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers excellent cooling and low noise with a striking design, and the bulky third fan is its only drawback.
9.5
Gameit ES
≈ estimated
15/03/2023
Hands-on review · temperatures, noise and build tests
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is nearly flawless, with a premium build and cool, quiet operation; it is strongly recommended if you can afford it.
9.0
TecnoRed
≈ estimated
18/01/2023
Unboxing and review · benchmarks at 1440p and 4K
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers excellent 1440p performance and strong DLSS gains, but it is very large and expensive.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Hardware review · Cooling and tweaking
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti OC looks sharp, stays quiet under load, and suits tweakers who want to push its clocks.
9.5
en.gamegpu.com
≈ estimated
14/02/2023
Benchmark review · Modes and outputs
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti OC has quiet and performance modes and five outputs, but it takes three slots and needs an adapter.
8.0
techporn.ph
✓ explicit
08/01/2023
Hands-on review · Noise and size
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti OC is a very quiet, well-built card for 4K gaming, but its size calls for a roomy case.
9.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
04/01/2023
Full review · Cooling and power
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti stays cool at 58°C and barely audible at full load, but needs a 750W power supply.
9.0
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
31/03/2023
Lab test · Overclocking and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RTX 4070 Ti OC is a quiet, well-built card that suits gamers at any resolution, though its large cooler is bulky for this class.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

  • Superior cooling performance with a massive heatsink and triple-fan design that keeps temperatures well below 70°C under load.
  • Exceptionally quiet operation, with users often describing it as 'whisper-quiet' or silent even during heavy gaming sessions.
  • High build quality featuring a robust die-cast shroud, metal frame, and backplate for added structural rigidity.
  • Attractive aesthetics with customizable Aura Sync ARGB lighting and a premium 'flagship' design.
  • Includes helpful extra features like dual BIOS (Performance/Quiet modes), additional HDMI ports, and external PWM fan headers for case integration.
  • Highly efficient performance-per-watt, delivering high frame rates at 1440p and 4K with lower power draw than previous-gen flagships.

What customers don't like about ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

  • Significant price premium, often referred to as the 'ROG Tax,' which can make it more expensive than higher-tier GPUs from other brands.
  • Large physical footprint (336mm length and 3.15-slot thickness), which may not fit in smaller or compact PC cases.
  • Some users report issues with coil whine, which can become more prominent over time.
  • Heavier weight (approx. 1.81kg) may require careful consideration or the use of a support bracket to prevent GPU sag.
  • Uses the 12VHPWR power connector, which may require an adapter for older power supplies that aren't ATX 3.0 compliant.

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a premium graphics card built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,680 CUDA cores and 12GB of high-speed GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit interface. It is specifically designed for high-performance 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming, offering advanced features like 4th Gen Tensor cores for DLSS 3 frame generation and 3rd Gen RT cores for superior ray tracing. The card stands out with its massive 3.15-slot design, utilizing three Axial-tech fans for 31% more airflow and vented die-cast components for exceptional thermal management. Main pros include its extremely quiet operation under load, robust factory overclocking with a boost clock reaching up to 2,790 MHz in OC mode, and a high-quality metal exoskeleton with customizable Aura Sync RGB. However, its significant physical size makes it incompatible with some smaller cases, and it carries a substantial price premium over standard MSRP models.

Compare ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found