OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£360VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):215 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 6 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

40%

6.4

Technical score

25%

8.1

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.4

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 62% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

▲Better than 62%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

44%

5.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.9

Power

11%

8.7

Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity

▼Worse than 63%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (6)
4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
  • asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
  • asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
  • asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
  • asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
asus-geforce-dual-rtx-2080
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080

Based on 4 · 2

Reviewers agree it runs cool and performs well, but find its looks plain and its size bulky.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080

Based on 216 owners sharing their experience in online comments

58%positive15%mixed27%negative

Owners praise fast, smooth gaming and strong overclocking, while heat and uneven performance cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report the card running at 80–85°C or higher in gaming, with fans getting loud and clocks dropping when temperatures peak.31
  • Owners say some demanding games, especially with ray tracing on, run well below expected frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.24
  • Owners report crashes, freezes, screen artifacts and black screens, with some cards needing replacement or RMA.18
  • Owners say memory overclocks are limited, and some cards freeze or become unstable above about +900 to +1000 MHz.6
  • Owners say performance gets choppier or drops over time, even though the card ran well when new.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

44%

5.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.9

Power

11%

8.7

Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity

6.4
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,614 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 10,614 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 68% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 7,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 60.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
18,669 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 18,669 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 64.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,611 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 7,611 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
10.07 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 10.07 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 73.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
14,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 14,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 69.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 51.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
215 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 215 W, which is lower than that of 49.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
245 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 245 W under peak load, which is higher than 56% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 39.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is higher than that of 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
215 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
268x 114x 58 mm
Length
267 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
114 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 114 mm tall, which is shorter than 74.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65.9% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Weight
653 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 653 g, which is lighter than 82.9% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 224 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (368 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    368 vs 144
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 60% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 11 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 60% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 224 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (368 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    368 vs 144
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 11 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114 mm vs 125 mm
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 21.1% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,515 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,515 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 17.9% lower sentiment score
    6.4 vs 7.8
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.1% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,515 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,515 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 32.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (109.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    109.4 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 55.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (10.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    10.07 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 5 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2018 vs 2023).
    September 2018
    2018 vs 2023
  • 16.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (314.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    314.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 28.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10,614 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    10,614 points vs 14,779 points
  • 17.5% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (18,669 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    18,669 points vs 22,638 points
  • 18% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7,500 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    7,500 points vs 9,148 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    64 KB vs 128 KB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3 vs 4
  • No Resizable BAR
    This graphics card does not support Resizable BAR, while the average graphics card does. 76.4% of Graphics cards support it.
  • 85.4% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (545 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    545 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1a).
    2.0b vs 2.1a
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
SerpentX Tech
≈ estimated
07/10/2018
Hands-on review · temperatures, games and value
Verdict
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 is a capable, cool-running card, but its price is hard to justify for the performance.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
24/01/2019
Lab test · Turing graphics card
Verdict
The ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 DUAL OC runs nearly as fast as the STRIX OC with a plainer look, but ray tracing and DLSS need games that support them.
9.5
hardwareinside.de
✓ explicit
09/10/2018
Lab test · Overclocking and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 OC is a plain, three-slot card that overclocks well, reaching a 2085 MHz core clock, though its power limit holds clocks back.
8.0
madboxpc.com
≈ estimated
27/11/2018
Lab test · Mid-range Turing card
Verdict
The ASUS DUAL-RTX2080-O8G performs close to a GTX 1080 Ti and adds ray tracing, but it only makes sense as an upgrade from a GTX 1070 or older.
9.0
techtesters.eu
✓ explicit
26/10/2018
Benchmark review · Restrained dual-fan card
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 is a restrained card whose performance barely trails top models, staying cool and quiet, though it skips RGB.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080

  • Delivers reliable 1440p gaming performance with smooth frame rates in modern titles
  • Features a factory overclock out of the box for slightly better performance than reference designs
  • Includes a robust 2.7-slot cooling system that is generally quiet at idle or under moderate loads
  • Typically priced lower than premium tiers like the ROG Strix, offering better value for budget-conscious builds
  • Equipped with a sturdy metal backplate that increases structural rigidity and provides a premium feel
  • Includes features like IP5X dust resistance and a zero-decibel fan mode for silent operation below 55°C

What customers don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080

  • Prone to high operating temperatures (reaching 80-85°C) under heavy stress or manual overclocks
  • Large physical size (2.7-slot width and 26.5cm length) may not fit in micro-ATX or ITX cases
  • Some users have reported audible coil whine at high frame rates or frequencies
  • The basic dual-fan design lacks the RGB lighting found on many other contemporary RTX models
  • Cooler performance can become loud and struggle to maintain low temps compared to triple-fan models
  • Exposed multi-coloured internal cables near the end of the card detract from the overall aesthetic

Verdict

The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 is an enthusiast-level graphics card based on the 12nm Turing architecture, featuring 2944 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface with a 448 GB/s bandwidth. It operates at a base clock of 1515 MHz with a boost clock reaching up to 1800 MHz in OC mode, supporting real-time ray tracing and DLSS through 46 RT cores and 368 Tensor cores. Main pros include its effective 2.7-slot cooling system with dual IP5X-certified Axial-tech fans for low-noise operation, a rigid aluminum backplate, and reliable Auto-Extreme manufacturing. Key cons are its significant physical size which may not fit in smaller cases, the absence of extensive RGB lighting for aesthetic-focused builds, and the HDMI 2.0 limitation which prevents 4K output at 120Hz with HDR enabled.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found