OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£390VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):245 W

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Score components

90%

7.5

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

▲Better than 60% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▲Better than 84%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 59% of models
Score components

44%

7.4

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

8.9

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 59%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 81%
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7700-xt-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 59% of models
Score components:

44%

7.4

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

8.9

Connectivity & Media

7.5
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 79.9% of products in this category.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 17,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 54.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,166 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 9,166 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,659 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,659 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,961 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 12,961 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
35.93 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.93 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 66.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
432 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 432 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 58.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
245 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 245 W, which is higher than that of 57% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
245 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 245 W under peak load, which is higher than 55.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.7% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
245 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 245 W, which is higher than that of 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
245 W
Show more
Size
302x 130x 56 mm
This graphics card measures 302x130x 56 mm, which is larger than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Length
302 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 302 mm long, which is longer than 60.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
454 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 454 g, which is lighter than 93.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2599 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,599 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 52.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (249.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    249.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 47.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (561.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    561.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 14 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (54 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    54 vs 40
  • 14 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (54 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    54 vs 40
  • 11.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.89 vs 8.000).
    8.89 vs 8
  • 9.6% better value for money
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.89 vs 7.2).
    7.89 vs 7.2
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2599 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,599 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 52.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (249.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    249.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 47.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (561.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    561.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 14 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (54 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    54 vs 40
  • 14 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (54 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    54 vs 40
  • 59.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    35.93 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 32 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (216 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    216 vs 184
  • 2.33x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.12 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.42x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (71.9 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    71.86 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 12 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    55 °C vs 67 °C
  • 55.5% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (454 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    454 g vs 1,021 g
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 36 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (108 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    108 vs 144
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 36 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (108 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    108 vs 144
  • 7.1% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1784 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,784 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 14% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (245 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    245 W vs 215 W
  • 15.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (51 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    51 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 17 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (302 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    302 mm vs 285 mm
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
31/10/2023
Summary of the review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC review
T
tuttotech.net
06/09/2023
Summary of the review
Recensione Gigabyte Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC.
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, consistently delivering high frame rates (60-140+ FPS) in modern titles.
  • Efficient Windforce cooling system that maintains low GPU temperatures (often around 55-70°C) even under load.
  • Quiet operation; the triple-fan setup remains nearly silent with a default fan curve around 1,000 RPM.
  • Solid build quality featuring a protective metal backplate that helps prevent PCB sag.
  • Competitive value, frequently found at or below the official MSRP, offering factory-overclocked speeds for less than reference prices.
  • Future-proof connectivity with DisplayPort 2.1 support.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC

  • Noticeable coil whine reported by some users, which can be audible during high-load gaming sessions.
  • Large physical footprint (occupies nearly 3 PCIe slots), which may not fit in smaller or compact cases.
  • Higher power consumption (rated up to 245W-257W) compared to competing NVIDIA mid-range cards like the RTX 4060 Ti.
  • Ray tracing performance trails behind NVIDIA's equivalent offerings.
  • A bit of an awkward value proposition if the price is too close to the more powerful RX 7800 XT.
  • Occasional driver-related stuttering reported in specific titles like Fortnite, often requiring manual troubleshooting.

Verdict

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC is a high-performance mid-range graphics card built on the RDNA 3 architecture, featuring 3456 stream processors and a factory overclocked boost clock of 2599 MHz. It is equipped with 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface, delivering 432 GB/s bandwidth to excel in 1440p gaming. Key characteristics include the WINDFORCE cooling system with three 90mm fans, a protective metal backplate, and Dual BIOS for switching between performance and silent modes. Main pros include its excellent thermal management, high-speed DisplayPort 2.1 support, and efficient AV1 encoding for streamers. However, cons include its large 302mm triple-slot design that may not fit in compact cases and a performance profile that often feels overshadowed by the higher-tier RX 7800 XT for only a modest price difference.

Compare GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7700 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found