OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£360VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):180 W

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

▼Worse than 53% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

▲Better than 64%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

44%

6.3

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.7

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 52%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 88%
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-5060-ti-dual-oc-8gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

44%

6.3

Performance

24%

4.9

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.7

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity & Media

6.9
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Popularity:
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB has a popularity score of 2.4 points, which is lower than that of 54.7% of products in this category.
2.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
15,280 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 15,280 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 52% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,158 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 10,158 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,538 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,538 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,510 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 11,510 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 52.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
24.26 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 24.26 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 53.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 75.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
180 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 180 W, which is lower than that of 58.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
180 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 180 W under peak load, which is lower than 61.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
180 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 180 W, which is lower than that of 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
180 W
Show more
Size
262.1x 126.3x 40.1 mm
This graphics card measures 262.1x126.3x 40.1 mm, which is more compact than 78% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
262.1 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 262.1 mm long, which is shorter than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
126.3 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 126.3 mm tall, which is taller than 52.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
980 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 980 g, which is lighter than 57% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 5.1% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2632 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,632 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25.4% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2407 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,407 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 5.1% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2632 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,632 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25.4% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2407 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,407 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.14x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (759 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    759 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 8 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (87 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    87 °C vs 95 °C
  • 16.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (180 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    180 W vs 215 W
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (262.1x126.3 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    262.1x126.3 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 22.9 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (262.1 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    262.1 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 22.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (126.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    126.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB
    the average graphics card
    Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 22.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (126.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    126.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 4 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    36 vs 40
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 11 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (78 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    78 °C vs 67 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcgamer.com
15/04/2026
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB review (Palit Dual) - PC Gamer
G
geekom.it
30/12/2025
Summary of the review
RTX 5060: tutto ciò che sappiamo sulla nuova GPU di NVIDIA PcComponentes.it
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

  • Strong 1080p performance with smooth gameplay in most modern titles
  • Compact dual-fan design fits easily in most small form factor (SFF) cases
  • Excellent power efficiency, often drawing less than its 180W TDP under standard load
  • Quiet operation and effective cooling even under heavy gaming sessions
  • Support for modern features like DLSS 4 and Frame Generation for boosted frame rates
  • Includes a standard 8-pin power connector, making it compatible with older power supplies

What we don't like about Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB

  • 8GB VRAM is a major bottleneck for 1440p ultra settings and modern ray-tracing titles
  • Significant performance drops or stuttering in VRAM-intensive games like 'Indiana Jones' and 'Stalker 2'
  • Limited generational improvement in pure rasterisation (approx. 10–15%) over the previous 4060 Ti
  • Plastic backplate feels less premium compared to higher-end partner models
  • PCIe 5.0 x8 interface can cause performance degradation on older PCIe 3.0 motherboards
  • Hard BIOS power limit prevents significant manual overclocking on this specific Palit model

Verdict

The Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB is a mid-range graphics card built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture, featuring 4,608 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost speed of up to 2632MHz. It utilizes 8GB of advanced GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a significant 448 GB/s bandwidth and supporting cutting-edge features like DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation and DisplayPort 2.1b. Its main pros include high energy efficiency with a 180W TDP, a compact dual-slot design with twin 95mm fans for quiet cooling, and exceptional 1080p performance. However, its primary cons are the 8GB VRAM capacity, which can limit performance in VRAM-intensive AAA titles at 1440p or high settings, and a limited PCIe 5.0 x8 interface that may see reduced bandwidth on older PCIe 3.0 motherboards.

Compare Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual OC 8GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found