OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):115 W

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▼Worse than 65% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

▼Worse than 58%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

3.9

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 69%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 93%
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
msi-geforce-rtx-4060-gaming-x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

3.9

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.2
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X has a popularity score of 9.2 points, which is higher than that of 86% of products in this category.
9.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,996 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 10,996 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 66.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,078 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 6,078 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 66.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
18,158 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 18,158 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 65.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
9,209 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 9,209 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 63.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
15.94 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 15.94 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 62.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
272 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 272 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 76.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
17 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 17 Gbps, which is slower than on 58.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
115 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 115 W, which is lower than that of 85.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
121 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 121 W under peak load, which is lower than 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
121 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 121 W, which is lower than that of 85.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
115 W
Show more
Size
247x 130x 41 mm
This graphics card measures 247x130x 41 mm, which is more compact than 79.8% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Length
247 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 247 mm long, which is shorter than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
587 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 587 g, which is lighter than 88% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 3.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2595 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 21.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2125 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 46.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (121 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    121 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 38 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (247 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    247 mm vs 285 mm
  • 16.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.33 vs 8.000).
    9.33 vs 8
  • 16.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.33 vs 8.000).
    9.33 vs 8
  • 2.18x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X is more popular than the average graphics card (9.18 vs 4.2).
    9.18 vs 4.22
  • 3.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2595 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,595 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2125 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 46.1% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (159 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    159 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 46.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (121 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    121 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (52 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    52 °C vs 67 °C
  • 10.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (25 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    25 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 38 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (247 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    247 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (247x130 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    247x130 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 42.5% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (587 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    587 g vs 1,021 g
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 16 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    24 vs 40
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 88 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    96 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    24 vs 40
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 16 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    24 vs 40
  • 88 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    96 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    24 vs 40
  • 34.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (249.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    249.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 48 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    96 vs 144
  • 23.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (125.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    125.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 29.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (15.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    15.94 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 19.8% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (18158 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    18,158 points vs 22,653 points
  • 4.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1830 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 25.1% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10996 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,996 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 33.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6078 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    6,078 points vs 9,166 points
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 39.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 10.5% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (17000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    17,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 7 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (44 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    44 °C vs 37 °C
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X review - www.guru3d.com
T
techpowerup.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X Review | TechPowerUp TechPowerUp +1
O
overclockers.com
18/07/2023
Summary of the review
MSI RTX 4060 Gaming X 8G Review - Overclockers
T
tweaktown.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X 8G Review - TweakTown TweakTownWould you like to see performance benchmarks comparing this specific model against the ba...
H
hothardware.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X Review: Goosed-Up Graphics - HotHardware
M
me.ign.com
02/07/2023
Summary of the review
MSI Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 review - IGN Middle East
I
igorslab.de
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X 8G Review with 3 GHz overclocking test - Igor's LAB
A
arnowelzel.de
27/09/2023
Summary of the review
GeForce RTX 4060 vs. GTX 1060 - Arno Welzel
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
28/06/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 : l'héritière de la GTX 1060 est enfin là
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X

  • Excellent 1080p gaming performance, often referred to as the 'King of 1080p' for high-frame-rate AAA and esports gaming.
  • Incredible power efficiency, consuming roughly 30% less power than previous generation equivalents like the RTX 3060.
  • Exceptional cooling and quiet operation, with users noting near-silent fans and load temperatures often settling around 50-60°C.
  • Premium build quality featuring a sturdy metal backplate and a sophisticated cooling design compared to entry-level plastic models.
  • Access to modern features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding, which significantly boost performance in supported titles.
  • Compact two-slot design that fits easily into smaller PC cases, including many mini-ITX builds.

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X

  • Limited 8GB VRAM and a narrow 128-bit memory bus, which can lead to performance stutters or texture quality issues in newer, memory-heavy titles.
  • High price premium for the Gaming X trim, making it difficult to justify over the standard MSRP models despite its superior cooler.
  • Underwhelming generational performance uplift in raw rasterisation compared to the RTX 3060 Ti, which can still outperform it in some scenarios.
  • PCIe 4.0 x8 interface can limit performance on older systems using the PCIe 3.0 standard.
  • Performance drops off significantly at resolutions higher than 1080p, especially at 4K.

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X is a premium, factory-overclocked graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 3072 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a 17 Gbps speed. It delivers a boost clock of up to 2595 MHz (rising to 2610 MHz via MSI Center) and utilizes the advanced Twin Frozr 9 thermal system with Torx Fan 5.0 for exceptionally cool and quiet 1080p gaming performance. Its main strengths include industry-leading power efficiency with a 115W TDP, support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation, and a high-quality build featuring a sturdy metal backplate and customizable RGB lighting. However, it is limited by its relatively small 8GB VRAM and narrow memory interface, which can bottleneck performance at 1440p or higher resolutions in modern, VRAM-heavy titles.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Gaming X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found