OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Ricoh WG M1 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:190 gBattery life (CIPA):350 shots

Ricoh WG M1 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.4

Overall score

Score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

90%

4.0

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 82% of cameras
4.0

Technical score

Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

28%

4.0

Sensor & Image

25%

2.7

Photo Features

18%

5.2

Video & Audio

14%

3.8

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 86% of cameras
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 84 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 90% of cameras
  • ricoh-wg-m1
  • ricoh-wg-m1
  • ricoh-wg-m1
  • ricoh-wg-m1
  • ricoh-wg-m1
  • ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1
ricoh-wg-m1

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Ricoh WG M1

Technical score
Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

28%

4.0

Sensor & Image

25%

2.7

Photo Features

18%

5.2

Video & Audio

14%

3.8

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

4.0
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 84 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Ricoh WG M1 has a popularity score of 7, which is higher than 68.4% of cameras.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

60%

4.4

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

5.9
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
14 MP
Main camera megapixels
14 MP
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 14 MP, which is lower than that of 78.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.42 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.42 µm
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.42 µm, which are smaller than those in 70.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 800
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 800, which is lower than that of 99.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
â–² Better than 29% of models
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
15 Mbps
Video bitrate
15 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 15 Mbps which is lower than that of 82.3% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
action camera
Weight
190 g
Weight
190 g
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 190 g which is lighter than 82.7% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
66.5 mm
Width
66.5 mm
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 66.5 mm which is narrower than 99.7% of cameras.
Height
42.5 mm
Height
42.5 mm
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 42.5 mm which is shorter than 100% of cameras.
Thickness
89.5 mm
Thickness
89.5 mm
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 89.5 mm which is thicker than 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 350 shots, which is longer than that of 54.5% of cameras and equal to that of 5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.4% of cameras and equal to those in 3.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–² Better than 54% of models
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Data and power.
Show more

Ricoh WG M1 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • 205 g lighter
    Weight
    190 g
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (190 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    190 g vs 395 g
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 205 g lighter
    Weight
    190 g
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (190 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    190 g vs 395 g
  • 53.4 mm narrower
    Width
    66.5 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (66.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    66.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 31.4 mm shorter body
    Height
    42.5 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (42.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    42.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 130 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,250 mAh
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1250 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,250 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • 0.1 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.1 GB
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.1 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 1.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    1.5 in
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    1.5 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.92 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.42 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.42 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 8% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ricoh WG M1
    the average camera
    Ricoh WG M1 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.41 vs 8.000).
    7.41 vs 8
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Ricoh WG M1 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.91 vs 6.2).
    5.91 vs 6.2
  • 1.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    1.5 in
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    1.5 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 43.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    89.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (89.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    89.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 10 m shallower water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    10 m
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >0 m
    This camera has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average camera (10 m vs 0 m). The average camera has a waterproof depth rating of 0 m.
    10 m vs 0 m
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.92 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.42 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.42 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 25 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    48 points
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <52 points – >94 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (48 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    48 points vs 73 points
  • 5,600 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    800 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Fixed-focus design.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • No two-stage shutter
    Two-stage shutter button
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This camera does not have a two-stage shutter button, the average camera does.
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 15 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    15 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 5 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    25 min
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <25 min – >60 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (25 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    25 min vs 30 min

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
webbikeworld.com
10/11/2014
Summary of the review
Ricoh WG-M1 Review - webBikeWorld
D
digitaleyes.de
05/12/2014
Summary of the review
Review: Ricoh WG-M1 Action Camera
(Translated)Show original
A
alpin.de
Keine Angabe
Summary of the review
Ricoh WG-M1 - Alpin
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
03/02/2015
Summary of the review
Ricoh WG-M1 Review: The Rugged, No-Nonsense Action Cam
(Translated)Show original
E
elektrozine.be
10/06/2015
Summary of the review
Review: Ricoh WG-M1 action cam - Elektrozine.be
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 84 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Ricoh WG M1

  • Rugged and waterproof (up to 10m/32ft) without requiring an additional external housing
  • Large, textured physical buttons that are easy to operate with gloves or underwater
  • Integrated 1.5-inch color LCD monitor allows for live framing and menu navigation without guesswork
  • High-quality video performance with good exposure and color rendition for an action camera
  • Built-in Wi-Fi and a dedicated smartphone app allow for remote control and quick file sharing
  • Wide-angle lens options (up to 160 degrees) and fast continuous shooting at 10 images per second
  • Sturdy build quality that is shock-resistant (up to 2m) and cold-resistant

What we don't like about Ricoh WG M1

  • Limited battery life, often cited around 350 shots or approximately 25 minutes of continuous video recording
  • Challenging to mount on curved surfaces like helmets due to its unique shape and flat-bottomed mount
  • Menu system is described as unintuitive and difficult to navigate initially
  • Highlights can blow out easily in high-contrast conditions, leading to overexposed skies
  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor results in average image quality and poor low-light performance for still photos
  • Lacks advanced features found in competitors, such as 4K video, GPS, or image stabilization
  • Lens does not rotate, making it less flexible for varied mounting orientations

Verdict

The Ricoh WG-M1 is a rugged action camera featuring a 14MP CMOS sensor and an f/2.8 ultra-wide lens with a 160-degree field of view for stills and 137 degrees for video. It records Full HD 1080p video at 30fps and offers a high-speed 120fps mode at 848x480 for slow-motion playback. Its primary characteristics include a built-in 1.5-inch LCD monitor and internal Wi-Fi for smartphone connectivity, all housed in a body that is waterproof to 10m, shockproof from 2m, and freeze-proof to -10°C without requiring an external case. Main pros include its durable housing-free design, clear stereo sound recording, and a fast 10fps burst mode for photos. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in viewfinder, the absence of RAW image support, and limited mounting options due to its unique horizontal form factor.

Compare Ricoh WG M1 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ricoh WG M1 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found