Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Ricoh GR II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£820Sensor size:APS-CWeight:251 gBattery life (CIPA):320 shots

Ricoh GR II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 53% of cameras
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.5

Display & Design

8%

5.1

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 53% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £820
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Ricoh GR II

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

4.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.5

Display & Design

8%

5.1

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

5.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Ricoh GR II has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

6.2

Price

5.4
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP, which is higher than that of 46.8% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.79 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.79 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.79 µm, which are larger than those in 78.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
15 Mbps
Video bitrate
15 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 15 Mbps which is lower than that of 82.3% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
251 g
Weight
251 g
This camera weighs 251 g which is lighter than 68.1% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
117 mm
Width
117 mm
This camera has a width of 117 mm which is narrower than 53.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Height
62.8 mm
Height
62.8 mm
This camera has a height of 62.8 mm which is shorter than 71.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
34.7 mm
Thickness
34.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 34.7 mm which is thinner than 67.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
320 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
320 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 320 shots, which is shorter than that of 52.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.4% of cameras and equal to those in 3.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Ricoh GR II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1.45 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.79 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.79 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Image Sync
  • 1.3 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.7 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 144 g lighter
    Weight
    251 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (251 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    251 g vs 395 g
  • 11.1 mm shorter body
    Height
    62.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62.8 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    62.8 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1.45 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.79 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.79 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1.3 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.7 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • 7 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    80 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (80 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    80 points vs 73 points
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    July 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • 0.6 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    23.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (23.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    23.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • 235 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,078 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1078 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,078 points vs 843 points
  • 270 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    300 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (300 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    300 s vs 30 s
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • 130 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,250 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1250 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,250 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Image Sync
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.054 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.054 GB vs 0 GB
  • Has NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This camera supports NFC, the average camera does not. 15% of cameras support NFC.
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    1.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (1.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    1.5 vs -4
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 15 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    15 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 14.2% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR II has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.43 vs 6.2).
    5.43 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Ricoh GR II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 14.2% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR II has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.43 vs 6.2).
    5.43 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Ricoh GR II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 2.83x more expensive
    Ricoh GR II is more expensive than the average camera (£820 vs £290).
    £820 vs £290
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    1.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (1.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    1.5 vs -4
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • 15 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    15 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    15 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 5 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    25 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (25 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    25 min vs 30 min

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mirrorlessons.com
01/04/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
20/08/2015
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
06/08/2015
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
16/02/2016
Summary of the review
S
streetshootr.com
10/11/2017
Summary of the review
L
letterstobarbara.com
02/03/2019
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
10/09/2015
Summary of the review
D
digitaler-augenblick.de
03/11/2015
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
10/11/2018
Summary of the review
K
krone.at
22/08/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/09/2015
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
24/12/2015
Summary of the review
P
photoklub.com
13/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
29/09/2015
Summary of the review
J
jotabarros.com
29/02/2016
Summary of the review
R
revista-gadget.es
Sin fecha
Summary of the review
A
alessiodileo.it
26/04/2019
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
08/05/2016
Summary of the review
L
lucarossifoto.it
14/06/2018
Summary of the review
E
effeunoequattro.net
10/09/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Ricoh GR II

  • Truly pocketable design that fits in jeans pockets
  • Large APS-C sensor provides high image quality and shallow depth-of-field
  • Exceptional ergonomics optimized for one-handed operation
  • Snap Focus mode for near-instant street photography
  • Highly sharp 28mm f/2.8 fixed lens
  • Classic 'Positive Film' and high-contrast B&W film simulations
  • Built-in flash (which was removed in later models)
  • Extremely fast startup and shutdown times

What we don't like about Ricoh GR II

  • Autofocus is slow and often 'hunts' in low-light conditions
  • Poor video quality with very limited manual controls
  • The sensor is prone to collecting internal dust due to lack of sealing
  • No built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) or tilting screen
  • Lacks image stabilization (IBIS), making handheld night shots difficult
  • Wi-Fi app connectivity is often described as slow or buggy
  • Fixed 28mm focal length lacks the versatility of a zoom lens

Verdict

The Ricoh GR II is a pocket-sized compact camera featuring a large 16.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor and a fixed 18.3mm f/2.8 lens, which provides a 28mm equivalent wide-angle field of view. Renowned for its magnesium alloy build and exceptional one-handed ergonomics, it includes a unique 'Snap Focus' mode for instant street photography and a built-in ND filter to manage bright light. Its main pros are the remarkable lens sharpness due to the lack of an anti-aliasing filter, highly customizable controls, and the inclusion of Wi-Fi and NFC for mobile transfers. However, its notable cons include a slow and sometimes unreliable contrast-detection autofocus system in low light, the lack of a tilting or touch-sensitive screen, and no built-in image stabilisation.

Compare Ricoh GR II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ricoh GR II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found